Paths of commercial knowledge: Forms and consequences of university-enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1465-1476

  Shinn, Terry ^a   Lamy, Erwan ^b  

^a Maison des Sciences de l'Homme   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Boundary crossing; Commercial knowledge; Coordination modes; Relative autonomy; University enterprise synergy

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COMMERCIAL KNOWLEDGE; COORDINATION MODES; RADICAL CONTEXTUALISATION; RELATIVE AUTONOMY; UNIVERSITY-ENTERPRISE SYNERGY;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33751378190     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.024     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bourdieu, P., 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité: Cours du Collège de France 2000-2001, Raisons d'agir, Paris.
2. Cassier, M., 2002. L'engagement des chercheurs vis à vis de l'industrie et du marché, In: Alter, N., (Ed.), Les logiques de l'innovation. La Découverte, Paris.
3. CNRS, 2005. http://hydre.auteuil.cnrs-dir.fr/dae/faitsetchiffres2003/09_partenariats .html, consulted in January 2005.
4. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27 8 (1998) 823-833
5. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 109-123
6. Etzkowitz H., Webster C., Gebhardt B., and Terra R.C. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 313-330
7. Fiset, L., Ippersiel, M.-P., Martineau, Y., Trépanier, M., 1999. Institutions du savoir et PME: synthèse des écrits et bilan des problèmes et besoins des intervenants québécois, Rapport d'étape présenté à L'Observatoire de Développement économique Canada. INRS-Urbanisation.
8. Freidson E. Professionalism Reborn. Theory, Prophesy and Policy (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
9. Freidson E. Professionalism, the third logic. On the Practice of Knowledge (2001), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
10. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., and Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (1994), Sage Publications, London
11. Godin B., and Gingras Y. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 273-278
12. Grossetti M. Science, industrie et territoire (1995), Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse
13. Joerges B., and Shinn T. Instrumentation, Between Science, State and Industry (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
14. Kornhauser W. Scientists in Industry: Conflict and Accommodation (1962), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
15. Krimsky S. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (2003), Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD
16. Lamy, E., 2005. La fragmentation de la science à l'épreuve des start-ups: Retour critique sur un constructivisme social au travers de l'étude des modes de coordination des pratiques scientifiques et marchandes lors des projets de création d'entreprise par des chercheurs du secteur public, Thèse de doctorat d'épistémologie de l'Université Paris 7 - Denis Diderot, Paris.
17. Merton R.K. The normative structure of science. In: Merton R.K. (Ed). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973 [1942]), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Mustar B. Spin-offs from public research: Trends and outlook. STI Review 26 (2001) 165-172
19. Mustar, P., 2003. Création d'entreprises à partir de la recherché. In: Mustar, P., Penan, H. (Eds.), Encyclopédie de l'innovation, Economica, Paris.
20. Nowotny H., Scott H.P., and Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2001), Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
21. Owen-Smith J. From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Research Policy 32 6 (2003) 1081-1104
22. Ramunni, G., 1995. Les Sciences pour l'Ingénieur: Histoire du rendez-vous des sciences et de la société, CNRS éditions, Paris.
23. Reamer A., Icerman L., and Youtie J. Technology Transfer and Commercialization: Their Role in Economic Development (2003), US Economic Development Administration, Washington, DC
24. Shinn T. Scientific disciplines and organizational specificity: the social and cognitive configuration of laboratory activities. In: Elias N., Martins H., and Whitley R. (Eds). Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies (1982), Reidel Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
25. Shinn, T., Ragouet, P., 2005. Controverses sur la science: Pour une sociologie transversaliste de l'activité scientifique, Raisons d'agir, Paris.
26. Slaughter S., and Leslie L. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London
27. STI Review, 2001. No. 26, Special Issue on Fostering High-tech Spin-offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation. OCDE.
28. Vavakova, B., 2001. La Science de la Nation: Les Paradoxes politiques de la logique économique, L'Harmattan, Paris.
29. Whitley R. The Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences (1984), Clarendon Press, Oxford
30. Ziman J. Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science (1978), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge