The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments?

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 30, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 115-127

  Mowery, David C ^a,b   Sampat, Bhaven N ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayh Dole; Patents; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

BAYH-DOLE; HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM; INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; PATENTS; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIES; WESTERN EUROPE;

INDUSTRY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 33845290350     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 1998, AUTM Licensing Survey 1998, Survey Summary. Norwalk,CT: AUTM.
2. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 2000, The AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 1999, Association of University Technology Managers.
3. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Montobbio, 2004, Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Case Mimeo.
4. Christie, A.F., S.D 'Aloisio, K.L. Gaita, M.J. Howlett, and E.M. Webster, 2003, 'Analysis of the Legal Framework for Patent Ownership in Publicly Funded Research Institutions,' Commonwealth of Australia, Division of Education, Science, and Training.
5. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh, 2002, 'Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D,' Management Science 48, 1-23.
6. Colyvas, J.M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R.R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg, and B.N. Sampat, 2002, 'How Do University Inventions Get into Practice?' Management Science 48, 61-72.
7. Dasgupta, P. and P. David, 1994, 'Towards a New Economics of Science,' Research Policy 23 (5), 487-521.
8. Eisenberg, R., 1996, 'Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research,' Virginia Law Review 82, 1663-1727.
9. Eisenberg, R, 2001, 'Bargaining over the Transfer of Proprietary Research Tools: Is This Market Emerging or Failing?,' in D.L. Zimmerman, R.C. Dreyfuss, and H. First, (eds.), Expanding the Bounds of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Geiger, R. 1986, To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940, New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Geiger, R.L., 1993, Research And Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Government University Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR), 1991, Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interactions with Universities, Washington,DC: National Academy Press.
13. Hall, B.H. and R.H. Ziedonis,2001, 'The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979-95,' RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 101-128.
14. Heller, M.A. and R.S. Eisenberg, 1998, 'Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,' Science 280, 298.
15. Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg,1998, 'Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting,1965-88,' Review of Economics & Statistics 80, 119-127.
16. Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, 1998, 'University Patenting Amid Changing Incentives for Commercialization,' in G. Barba Navaretti, P. Dasgupta, K.G. Mäler and D. Siniscalco (eds.), Creation and Transfer of Knowledge, New York: Springer.
17. Innovation's Golden Goose, 2002, The Economist 365, T3.
18. Katz, M.L. and J.A. Ordover, 1990, 'R&D Competition and Cooperation,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 137-192.
19. Kilger, C. and K. Bartenbach, 2002, 'New Rules for German Professors,' Science 298, 1173-1175.
20. Levin, R.C., A. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S. Winter, 1987, 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783-820.
21. Liebeskind, J., 2001, 'Risky Business:UNiversities and Intellectual Property,' Academe 87.
22. Mansfield, E., 1991, 'Academic Research and Industrial Innovations,' Research Policy 20, 1-12.
23. Merges, R. and R. Nelson, 1994, 'On Limiting or Encourag-ing Rivalry in Technical Progress: The Effect of Patent Scope Decisions,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Orga-nization 25, 1-24.
24. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat,and A.A. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980,' Research Policy 30, 99-119.
25. Mowery, D.C. and B.N. Sampat, 2001a, 'Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation,' Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 317-355.
26. Mowery, D.C. and B.N. Sampat, 2001b, 'University Patents, Patent Policies,and Patent Policy Debates, 1925-1980,' Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 781-814.
27. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis, 2004, Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University Industry Technology Transfer Before and After Bayh-Dole, Stanford University Press.
28. National Science Board, 2000, Science and Engineering Indica-tors, Washington,D.C.: U.S.Government Printing Office.
29. OECD, 2000, A New Economy? Paris: OECD.
30. OECD, 2003, Turning Science Into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations, Paris: OECD.
31. Reimers, N., 1998, Stanford's Office of Technology Licens-ing and the Cohen/Boyer Cloning Patents, An Oral His-tory Conducted in 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D., Regional Oral History Office, Berkeley, CA: The Bancroft Library, U.C. Berkeley.
32. Rosenberg, N, 1998, 'Technological Change in Chemicals: The Role of University-Industry Relations,' in A. Arora, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds.), Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth, New York: John Wiley.
33. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson, 1994, 'American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry,' Research Policy 23, 323-348.
34. Trow, M., 1979, 'Aspects of Diversity in American Higher Education,' in H. Gans (ed.), On the Making of Americans, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35. Trow, M., 1991, 'American Higher Education: "Exceptional" or Just Different,' in B.E. Shafer (ed.), Is America Differ-ent? A New Look at American Exceptionalism, New York: Oxford University Press.