Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 596-608

  Van Looy, Bart ^a   Callaert, Julie ^a   Debackere, Koenraad ^a,b  

^a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Academic inventors; Knowledge interactions; University Industry relations

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE BUILDINGS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ACADEMIC INVENTORS; KNOWLEDGE INTERACTIONS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONS;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 33748095759     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ACE, American Council on Education, 2001. Report examining challenges facing research collaborations between industry and universities. Report ACE Division of Government & Public Affairs (http://www.acenet.edu/news/press_release/2001/06june/bhef.release.html) .
2. Balconi M., Breschi S., and Lissoni F. Networks of inventors and the location of university research: an exploration of Italian data. Paper presented at the NPRnet Conference: rethinking science policy. Brighton (2002)
3. Blumenthal D., Campbell E.G., Causino N., et al. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine 335 (1996) 1734-1739
4. Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., and Florida R. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States (1999), MIT Press, London
5. Brooks H., and Randazzese L.P. University-industry relations: the next four years and beyond. In: Branscomb L.M., and Keller J.H. (Eds). Investing in Innovation: Creating an Innovation Policy that works (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge 361-399
6. Carayol N. Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy 32 6 (2003) 887-908
7. Cohen L.R., and Noll R.G. Privatising public research. Scientific American 271 (1994) 72-77
8. Dasgupta P., and David P.A. Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In: Feiwel G.R. (Ed). Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory (1987), N.Y.University Press 519-542
9. Dasgupta P., and David P.A. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 (1994) 487-521
10. David P.A., Foray D., and Steinmueller W.E. The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organizational behaviour. In: Gambardella A., and Malerba F. (Eds). The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe (1997), Cambridge University Press
11. Debackere K. Managing academic R&D as a business at K.U. Leuven: context, structure and processes. R&D Management 30 (2000) 323-329
12. Dosi G. Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics (2000), Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK
13. Drazen J., and Curfman G. Financial associations of authors. The New England Journal of Medicine 346 (2002) 1901-1902
14. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage. Research Policy 27 (1998) 823
15. Etzkowitz H., and Kemelgor C. The role of research centers in the collectivization of academic science. Minerva 36 (1998) 271-288
16. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 24 (1997) 2-5
17. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The endless transition: a 'triple helix' of university-industry-government relations. Minerva 36 (1998) 203-208
18. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 (2000) 109-123
19. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., and Healey P. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (1998), State University of New York press, Albany
20. European Innovation Scoreboard, 2002. Cordis Focus.
21. Faria J.R. Scientific, business and political networks in academia. Research in Economics 56 (2002) 187-198
22. Florida R., and Cohen W.M. Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In: Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., and Florida R. (Eds). Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States (1999), MIT Press, London 589-610
23. Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance (1987), Pinter, London
24. Freeman C. The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (1994) 463-514
25. Geuna, A., 1999. The changing rationale for university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? Paper 33 (SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton).
26. Geuna, A., Nesta, L., 2003. University patenting and its effects on academic research. Paper 99, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series. Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton.
27. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 402 (1999) C81-C84
28. Godin B. Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy 25 (1996) 587-606
29. Godin B., and Gingras Y. The impact of collaborative research on academic science. Science and Public Policy 27 1 (2000) 65-73
30. Hane G. Comparing university-industry linkages in the United States and Japan. In: Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., and Florida R. (Eds). Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States (1999), MIT Press, London 20-61
31. Hicks, D., Hamilton, K., 1999. Does university-industry collabortion adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology, Summer 1999.
32. Kelch R.P. Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine 346 (2002) 285-287
33. Leydesdorff L., and Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23 (1996) 279-286
34. Leydesdorff L., and Etzkowitz H. Triple helix of innovation: introduction. Science and Public Policy 25 (1998) 358-364
35. Lundvall B.-A. National Systems of Innovation (1992), Pinter, London
36. Martin B.R. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In: Geuna A., Salter A.J., Steinmueller W.E., and Hoffman Y.E. (Eds). Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance (2001), Edward Elgar Publishers
37. Martin B.R. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of knowledge production. Paper prepared for the SPRU Conference 'Rethinking Science Policy. Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy'. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, 21-23 March (2002)
38. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science considered. Science 159 (1968) 56-63
39. Merton, R.K., 1968b. The normative structure of science. In: Merton, R.K. (Ed.), The Sociology of Science, Ch., 13, pp. 267-278.
40. Mitroff I. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists. American Sociological Review 39 (1974) 579-595
41. Mowery D.C., and Nelson R.R. Sources of Industrial Leadership (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Mulkay M. The mediating role of the scientific elite. Social Studies of Science 6 (1976) 445-470
43. Murray, F., Stern, S., 2004. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. NBER working paper no. w11465.
44. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
45. Nelson R.R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1995) 48-90
46. Nelson R.R., and Rosenberg N. Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). National Innovation Systems (1993), Oxford University Press, Oxford 3-21
47. Nelson R.R. The market economy and the scientific commons. Research Policy 33 (2004) 455-471
48. Noble D. America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (1977), Oxford University Press, New York
49. OECD, 1999. University research in transition. OECD STI-Report. OECD Publications, France.
50. Owen-Smith J. From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy 32 6 (2003) 1081-1104
51. Pavitt K. Academic research, technical change and government policy. In: Krige J., and Pestre D. (Eds). Science in the Twentieth Century (1997), Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam 143-158
52. Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1995), The Free Press, New York
53. Ranga L.M., Debackere K., and von Tunzelmann N. Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: a case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics 58 2 (2003) 301-320
54. Saragossi S., and van Pottelsberghe B. What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer 18 (2003) 47-51
55. Steinmueller W.E. Basic research and industrial innovation. In: Dodgson M., and Rothwell R. (Eds). The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. (1994), Edward Elgar, Aldershot 54-66
56. Tijssen R.J.W. Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy 33 (2004) 709-733
57. Van Looy B., Debackere K., and Andries P. Stimulating regional development through knowledge driven entrepreneurship. In: Steyaert C., and Hjörth D. (Eds). Moving Entrepreneurship. (2003), Edward Elgar Publishers
58. Van Looy B., Ranga M., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Zimmermann E. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew effect?. Research Policy 33 (2004) 425-441
59. Vavakova B. The new social contract between governments, universities and society: has the old one failed?. Minerva 36 (1998) 209-228