Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 57-71

  Chen, Z Jeffrey ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HETEROSIS; HUMAN; POLYPLOIDY; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HUMANS; HYBRID VIGOR; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYPLOIDY; RNA INTERFERENCE;

ANIMALIA; ANURA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; SILURANA; TRITICUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 75949117260     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Darwin C.R. The Effects of Cross- and Self-fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom (1876), John Murry
2. Shull G.H. The composition of a field of maize. Amer. Breeders Assoc. Rep. 4 (1908) 296-301
3. East E.M. Inbreeding in corn. In Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for Years 1907-1908 (1908), Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station pp. 419-428
4. Duvick D.N. Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 69-74
5. Crow J.F. 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. Genetics 148 (1998) 923-928
6. Cheng S.H., et al. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 100 (2007) 959-966
7. Karpechenko G.D. Polyploid hybrids of Raphanus sativus L. × Brassica oleracea L. Bull. Appl. Bot. 17 (1927) 305-410
8. Clausen R.E., and Goodspeed T.H. Interspecific hybridization in Nicotiana. II. a tetraploid GLUTINOSA-TABACUM hybrid, an experimental verification of Winge's hypothesis. Genetics 10 (1925) 278-284
9. Goodspeed T.H. Chromosome number and morphology in Nicotiana VI: Chromosome numbers of forty species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 19 (1933) 649-653
10. O'Mara J.G. Cytogenetics of triticale. Bot. Rev. 19 (1953) 587-605
11. Guedes-Pinto H., et al. Triticale: Today and Tomorrow (1996), Springer
12. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (2004) 229-237
13. Wood T.E., et al. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 13875-13879
14. Masterson J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264 (1994) 421-424
15. Grant V. Plant Speciation (1981), Columbia University Press
16. Brochmann C., et al. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82 (2004) 521-536
17. Soltis D.E., and Soltis P.S. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evolu. 14 (1999) 348-352
18. Baumel A., et al. Molecular investigations in populations of Spartina anglica C.E. Hubbard (Poaceae) invading coastal Brittany (France). Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 1689-1701
19. Abbott R.J., and Lowe A.J. Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82 (2004) 467-474
20. U, N. (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special references to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Genet. 7, 389-452.
21. Wendel J.F., and Cronn R.C. Polyploidy and the evolutionary history of cotton. Adv. Agron. 78 (2003) 139-186
22. Salamini F., et al. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3 (2002) 429-441
23. Sall T., et al. Chloroplast DNA indicates a single origin of the allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica. J. Evol. Biol. 16 (2003) 1019-1029
24. Dubcovsky J., and Dvorak J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316 (2007) 1862-1866
25. Meyer R.C., et al. Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol. 134 (2004) 1813-1823
26. Rohde P., et al. Heterosis in the freezing tolerance of crosses between two Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (Columbia-0 and C24) that show differences in non-acclimated and acclimated freezing tolerance. Plant J. 38 (2004) 790-799
27. Alonso-Blanco C., et al. Natural allelic variation at seed size loci in relation to other life history traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 4710-4717
28. el-Assal S.E., et al. Pleiotropic effects of the Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 allelic variation underlie fruit trait-related QTL. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 6 (2004) 370-374
29. Jakobsson M., et al. A unique recent origin of the allotetraploid species Arabidopsis suecica: Evidence from nuclear DNA markers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 1217-1231
30. Comai L., et al. FISH analysis of meiosis in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Chromosome Res. 11 (2003) 217-226
31. Bushell C., et al. The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell 15 (2003) 1430-1442
32. Charlesworth B., and Charlesworth D. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74 (1999) 329-340
33. Muller H.J. Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants. Amer. Nat. 59 (1925) 346-353
34. Mable B.K. 'Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants': myths and mechanisms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82 (2004) 453-466
35. Dowling T.E., and Secor C.L. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 593-619
36. Mavarez J., et al. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441 (2006) 868-871
37. Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446 (2007) 279-283
38. Muller H.J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6 (1942) 71-125
39. Dobzhansky T. Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids. Genetics 21 (1936) 113-135
40. Brideau N.J., et al. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314 (2006) 1292-1295
41. Tang S., and Presgraves D.C. Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323 (2009) 779-782
42. Seidel H.S., et al. Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319 (2008) 589-594
43. Bomblies K., et al. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e236
44. Bikard D., et al. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323 (2009) 623-626
45. Vrana P.B., et al. Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nat. Genet. 25 (2000) 120-124
46. O'Neill R.J., et al. Undermethylation associated with retroelement activation and chromosome remodelling in an interspecific mammalian hybrid. Nature 393 (1998) 68-72
47. Josefsson C., et al. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1322-1328
48. Wang J., et al. Stochastic and epigenetic changes of gene expression in Arabidopsis polyploids. Genetics 167 (2004) 1961-1973
49. Lee H.S., and Chen Z.J. Protein-coding genes are epigenetically regulated in Arabidopsis polyploids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 6753-6758
50. East E.M. Heterosis. Genetics 21 (1936) 375-397
51. Lippman Z.B., et al. The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. PLoS Biol. 6 (2008) e288
52. Gore M.A., et al. A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326 (2009) 1115-1117
53. McMullen M.D., et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325 (2009) 737-740
54. Birchler J.A., et al. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell 15 (2003) 2236-2239
55. Michaels S.D., and Amasino R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11 (1999) 949-956
56. Corbesier L., et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316 (2007) 1030-1033
57. Valverde F., et al. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303 (2004) 1003-1006
58. Sasaki A., et al. Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416 (2002) 701-702
59. Buckler E.S., et al. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325 (2009) 714-718
60. Jones D.F. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2 (1917) 466-479
61. Bruce A.B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32 (1910) 627-628
62. Crow J.F. Alternative hypothesis of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33 (1948) 477-487
63. Semel Y., et al. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 12981-12986
64. Xiao J., et al. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140 (1995) 745-754
65. Li Z.K., et al. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158 (2001) 1737-1753
66. Yu S.B., et al. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 9226-9231
67. Stuber C.W., et al. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132 (1992) 823-839
68. Luo L.J., et al. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158 (2001) 1755-1771
69. Doebley J., et al. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141 (1995) 333-346
70. Guo M., et al. Genome-wide mRNA profiling reveals heterochronic allelic variation and a new imprinted gene in hybrid maize endosperm. Plant J. 36 (2003) 30-44
71. Guo M., et al. Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 1707-1716
72. Stupar R.M., and Springer N.M. Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 leads to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid. Genetics 173 (2006) 2199-2210
73. Swanson-Wagner R.A., et al. Paternal dominance of trans-eQTL influences gene expression patterns in maize hybrids. Science 326 (2009) 1118-1120
74. Auger D.L., et al. A test for a metastable epigenetic component of heterosis using haploid induction in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108 (2004) 1017-1023
75. Swanson-Wagner R.A., et al. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 6805-6810
76. Guo M., et al. Genome-wide transcript analysis of maize hybrids: allelic additive gene expression and yield heterosis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113 (2006) 831-845
77. Chen Z.J., and Pikaard C.S. Transcriptional analysis of nucleolar dominance in polyploid plants: biased expression/silencing of progenitor rRNA genes is developmentally regulated in Brassica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 3442-3447
78. Adams K.L., et al. Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 4649-4654
79. Jackson, S.A. and Chen, Z.J. (2009) Genomic and expression plasicity of polyploidy. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (in press), doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.11.004
80. Hovav R., et al. Partitioned expression of duplicated genes during development and evolution of a single cell in a polyploid plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 6191-6195
81. Hegarty M.J., et al. Transcriptome shock after interspecific hybridization in senecio is ameliorated by genome duplication. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1652-1659
82. Wang J., et al. Genomewide nonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics 172 (2006) 507-517
83. Yang S.S., et al. Accumulation of genome-specific transcripts, transcription factors and phytohormonal regulators during early stages of fiber cell development in allotetraploid cotton. Plant J. 47 (2006) 761-775
84. Dodd A.N., et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309 (2005) 630-633
85. Wijnen H., and Young M.W. Interplay of circadian clocks and metabolic rhythms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40 (2006) 409-448
86. Panda S., et al. Circadian rhythms from flies to human. Nature 417 (2002) 329-335
87. Michael T.P., et al. Enhanced fitness conferred by naturally occurring variation in the circadian clock. Science 302 (2003) 1049-1053
88. Mizoguchi T., et al. LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2 (2002) 629-641
89. Alabadi D., et al. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293 (2001) 880-883
90. Pruneda-Paz J.L., et al. A functional genomics approach reveals CHE as a component of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 323 (2009) 1481-1485
91. Strayer C., et al. Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 289 (2000) 768-771
92. Park D.H., et al. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285 (1999) 1579-1582
93. Wang Z.Y., and Tobin E.M. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 93 (1998) 1207-1217
94. McClung C.R. Plant circadian rhythms. Plant Cell 18 (2006) 792-803
95. Harmer S.L. The Circadian System in Higher Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 60 (2009) 357-377
96. Harmer S.L., et al. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290 (2000) 2110-2113
97. Smith S.M., et al. Diurnal changes in the transcriptome encoding enzymes of starch metabolism provide evidence for both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 136 (2004) 2687-2699
98. Covington M.F., et al. Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol. 9 (2008) R130
99. Lu Y., et al. Daylength and circadian effects on starch degradation and maltose metabolism. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 2280-2291
100. 2+. Trends Plant Sci. 10 (2005) 15-21
101. Ni Z., et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 457 (2009) 327-331
102. Reinbothe S., et al. PORA and PORB, two light-dependent protochlorophyllide-reducing enzymes of angiosperm chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Cell 8 (1996) 763-769
103. Sperling U., et al. Overexpression of light-dependent PORA or PORB in plants depleted of endogenous POR by far-red light enhances seedling survival in white light and protects against photooxidative damage. Plant J. 12 (1997) 649-658
104. Lloyd J.R., et al. Leaf starch degradation comes out of the shadows. Trends Plant Sci. 10 (2005) 130-137
105. Smith A.M., et al. Starch degradation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56 (2005) 73-98
106. Fujiwara S., et al. Circadian clock proteins LHY and CCA1 regulate SVP protein accumulation to control flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20 (2008) 2960-2971
107. Ding Z., et al. A complex genetic interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana TOC1 and CCA1/LHY in driving the circadian clock and in output regulation. Genetics 176 (2007) 1501-1510
108. Chen Z.J. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58 (2007) 377-406
109. Redei G.P. Single locus heterosis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 93 (1962) 164-170
110. Shpak E.D., et al. Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development 131 (2004) 1491-1501
111. Kim G.T., et al. The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 1267-1279
112. Hua J., et al. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 2574-2579
113. Doebley J., et al. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386 (1997) 485-488
114. Chandler V.L., and Stam M. Chromatin conversations: mechanisms and implications of paramutation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5 (2004) 532-544
115. Mittelsten Scheid O., et al. Formation of stable epialleles and their paramutation-like interaction in tetraploid Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 34 (2003) 450-454
116. Lee J.T., and Jaenisch R. The (epi)genetic control of mammalian X-chromosome inactivation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7 (1997) 274-280
117. Lee J.T. Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 309 (2005) 768-771
118. Bender J., and Fink G.R. Epigenetic control of an endogenous gene family is revealed by a novel blue fluorescent mutant of Arabidopsis. Cell 83 (1995) 725-734
119. Wittkopp P.J., et al. Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature 430 (2004) 85-88
120. Wang J., et al. Nonadditive regulation of FRI and FLC loci mediates flowering-time variation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genetics 173 (2006) 965-974
121. Chen M., et al. RNAi of met1 reduces DNA methylation and induces genome-specific changes in gene expression and centromeric small RNA accumulation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genetics 178 (2008) 1845-1858
122. Ha M., et al. Small RNAs serve as a genetic buffer against genomic shock in Arabidopsis interspecific hybrids and allopolyploids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 17835-17840
123. Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116 (2004) 281-297
124. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431 (2004) 356-363
125. Vazquez F., et al. Endogenous trans-acting siRNAs regulate the accumulation of Arabidopsis mRNAs. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 69-79
126. Peragine A., et al. SGS3 and SGS2/SDE1/RDR6 are required for juvenile development and the production of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 2368-2379
127. Ha M., et al. Interspecies regulation of microRNAs and their targets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1779 (2008) 735-742
128. Brown B.D., et al. Endogenous microRNA can be broadly exploited to regulate transgene expression according to tissue, lineage and differentiation state. Nat. Biotechnol. 25 (2007) 1457-1467
129. Long D., et al. Potent effect of target structure on microRNA function. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007) 287-294
130. Lippman Z., and Martienssen R. The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing. Nature 431 (2004) 364-370
131. McClintock B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226 (1984) 792-801
132. Comai L., et al. Phenotypic instability and rapid gene silencing in newly formed Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Plant Cell 12 (2000) 1551-1568
133. Brennecke J., et al. An epigenetic role for maternally inherited piRNAs in transposon silencing. Science 322 (2008) 1387-1392
134. Mosher R.A., et al. Uniparental expression of PolIV-dependent siRNAs in developing endosperm of Arabidopsis. Nature 460 (2009) 283-286
135. Slotkin R.K., et al. Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in pollen. Cell 136 (2009) 461-472
136. Halberg F., et al. Phase relations of 24-hour periodicities in blood corticosterone, mitoses in cortical adrenal parenchyma, and total body activity. Endocrinology 64 (1959) 222-230
137. de Mairan J. Observation botanique. Hist. Acad. Roy. Sci. (1729) 35-36
138. Gardner M.J., et al. How plants tell the time. Biochem. J. 397 (2006) 15-24
139. Yakir E., et al. Regulation of output from the plant circadian clock. FEBS J. 274 (2007) 335-345
140. McClung C.R. Comes a time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11 (2008) 514-520
141. Covington M.F., and Harmer S.L. The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e222
142. Gutierrez R.A., et al. Systems approach identifies an organic nitrogen-responsive gene network that is regulated by the master clock control gene CCA1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 4939-4944
143. Dodd A.N., et al. The Arabidopsis circadian clock incorporates a cADPR-based feedback loop. Science 318 (2007) 1789-1792