The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1255-1264

  Bradshaw, Mark F ^a   Glennerster, Andrew ^a   Rogers, Brian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Depth constancy; Depth scaling; Differential perspective; Vergence; Cue combination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0029935281     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00190-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bishop, P. O. (1989). Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: A new interpretation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 237, 445-469.
2. Bülthoff, H. H. & Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 1749-1758.
3. Cormack, R. H. (1984). Stereoscopic depth perception at far viewing distances. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 423-428.
4. Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. J. & Parker, A. J. (1991). Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature, 349, 411-413.
5. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87, 411-434.
6. Gillam, B. & Lawergren, B. (1983). The induced effect, vertical disparity and stereoscopic theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 121-130.
7. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). The constancy of depth and surface shape for stereoscopic surfaces under more naturalistic viewing conditions. Perception, 22, 118.
8. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1994). The effects of (i) different cues and (ii) the observers task in stereoscopic depth constancy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 2112.
9. Howard, I. P. (1970). Vergence, eye signature, and stercopsis. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 3, 201-204.
10. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Kaufman, L. (1974). Sight and mind and introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modelling of depth cue combination: In defence of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
13. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). The role of the vertical dimension in stereoscopic vision. Perception, 11, 377-386.
14. Maloney, L. T. & Landy, M. S. (1989). A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth, information. In Pearlman, W. A. (Ed.), Visual communications and image processing IV, proceedings of the SPIE, 1199, 1154-1163.
15. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature, 297, 376-379.
16. O'Leary, A. & Wallach, H. (1980). Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 131-135.
17. Porrill, J., Mayhew, J. E. W. & Frisby, J. P. (1987). Cyclotorsion, conformal invariance, and induced effects in stereoscopic vision. In Frontiers of visual science, proceedings of the 1985 symposium (pp. 90-108). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
18. Predebon, J. (1993). The familiar size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Perception, 22, 985-995.
19. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 36, 253-255.
20. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1995a). Disparity scaling and the perception of fronto-parallel surfaces. Perception, 24, 155-179.
21. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. (1995b). Binocular judgements of depth, size, shape and absolute distance: Is the same "D" used for all judgements? Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Suppl.), 35, S230.
22. Rogers, B. J., Bradshaw, M. F. & Glennerster, A. (1993). Differential perspective, disparity scaling and the perception of fronto-parallel surfaces: The role of horizontal and vertical disparities. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 1438.
23. Rogers, B. J., Bradshaw, M. F. & Glennerster, A. (1994). Are eye movements necessary in order to use vertical disparities? Perception, 23, 22.
24. Sobel, E. C. & Collett, T. S. (1991). Does vertical disparity scale the perception of stereoscopic depth? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 244, 87-90.
25. Tyler, C. W. (1983). Sensory processing of binocular disparity. In Shor, C. M. & Ciuffreda, K. J. (Eds), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects (pp. 199-295). London: Butterworth.
26. Wallach, H. & Zuckerman, C. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 404-412.