LEVERAGING MULTIRATER FEEDBACK TO FACILITATE SUCCESSFUL BEHAVIORAL CHANGE

Consulting Psychology Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 280-297

  Nowack, Kenneth M ^a  

^a Envisia Learning   (United States)

Author keywords

360 feedback; behavioral change; coaching; multirater feedback; talent leadership development

Indexed keywords

EID: 74049123898     PISSN: 10659293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017381     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
2. Arvey R.D., Zhang Z., Avolio B.J., and Kreueger R.F. Developmental and genetic determinants of leadership role occupancy among women. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007) 693-706
3. Atwater L., Waldman D., Ostroff C., Robie C., and Johnson K.M. Self-other agreement: Comparing its relationship with performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 13 (2005) 25-40
4. Atwater L., Wang M., Smither J.W., and Fleenor J.W. Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others' rating of leadership?. Journal of Applied Psychology 4 (2009) 876-886
5. Atwater L.E., and Brett J.F. Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360-degree feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior 66 (2005) 532-548
6. Atwater L.E., Waldman D., Atwater D., and Cartier. An upward feedback field experiment. Supervisors' cynicism, follow-up and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology 53 (2000) 275-297
7. Atwater L.E., Waldman D., and Brett J.F. Understanding and optimizing multi-source feedback. Human Resource Management Journal 41 (2002) 193-208
8. Atwater L.E., Ostroff C., Yammarino F.J., and Fleenor J.W. Self-other agreement: Does it really matter?. Personnel Psychology 51 (1998) 577-598
9. Atwater L.E., and Yammarino F.J. Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions?. Personnel Psychology 45 (1992) 141-164
10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 191-215
11. Becker M.H. The Health Belief Model and personal health behaviour. Health Education Monographs 2 4 (1974)
12. Bono J., and Colbert A. Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology 58 (2005) 171-203
13. Bouchard T.J., and Loehlin J.C. Genes, evolution and personality. Behavior Genetics 21 (2001) 243-273
14. Brett J., and Atwater L. 360-degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 930-942
15. Brutus S., Fleenor J.W., and London M. Elements of effective 360-degree feedback. In: Tornow W., and London M. (Eds). Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 11-27
16. Caputo, P. M., & Roch, S. (2009, April). Rating formats and perceptions of performance appraisal fairness. Poster presented at the 24th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
17. Chen Z., Williams K., Fitness J., and Newton N. When hurt will not heal: Exploring the capacity to relive social and physical pain. Psychological Perspectives 19 (2008) 789-795
18. Conway J., and Huffcutt A. Psychometric properties of multi-source performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer and self-ratings. Human Performance 10 (1997) 331-360
19. Conway J.M., Lombardo K., and Sanders K.C. A meta-analysis of incremental validity and nomological networks for subordinate and peer ratings. Human Performance 14 (2001) 267-303
20. Craig S.B., and Hannum K. Research update: 360-degree performance assessment. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 58 (2006) 117-122
21. DeNisi A., and Kluger A. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?. Academy of Management Executive 14 (2000) 129-139
22. Dickerson S., and Kemeny M. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004) 355-391
23. Dimeff L.A., and Marlatt G.A. Preventing relapse and maintaining change in addictive behaviors. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice 5 (1998) 513-552
24. Dunning D., Heath C., and Suls J. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (2004) 69-106
25. Eisenberger N., Lieberman M., and Williams K. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 302 (2003) 290-292
26. English, A., Rose, D., & McLellan, J. (2009, April). Rating scale label effects on leniency bias in 360-degree feedback. Paper presented at the 24th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
27. Facteau J.D., and Craig S.B. Are performance appraisal ratings obtained from different rating sources comparable?. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 215-227
28. Fleenor J.W., Taylor S., and Chappelow C. Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback (2008), Wiley, New York
29. Giesler R.B., Josephs R.A., and Swann W.B. Self-verification in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74 (1996) 1337-1349
30. Goffin R.D., and Anderson D.W. The self-rater's personality and self-other disagreement in multi-source performance ratings. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22 (2007) 271-289
31. Gosling S.D., John O.P., Craik K., and Robins R.W. Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 41-61
32. Gregory J.B., Levy P.E., and Jeffers M. Development of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 60 (2008) 42-56
33. Greguras G.J., and Robie C. A new look at within-rater source interrater reliability of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1995) 960-968
34. Harris M., and Schaubroeck J. A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology 41 (1988) 43-62
35. Hirsh J.B., and Inzlicht H. The devil you know: Neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 962-967
36. Hyman D.J., Pavlik V.N., Taylor W.C., Goodrick G.K., and Moye L. Simultaneous versus sequential counseling for multiple behavioral change. Archives of Internal Medicine 167 (2007) 1152-1158
37. Ilgen D., and Davis C. Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review 49 (2000) 550-565
38. Joo B.K. Executive coaching: A conceptual framework from an integrative review of research and practice. Human Resource Development Review 4 (2005) 134-144
39. Kluger A.N., and DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback theory. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996) 254-284
40. Kluger A.N., and De Nisi A. Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 (1998) 67-72
41. Larimer M.E., Palmer R.S., and Marlatt G.M. Relapse prevention: An overview of Marlatt's cognitive-behavioral model. Alcohol Research and Health 23 (1999) 151-160
42. Lawton R., Conner M., and McEachan R. Desire or reason: Predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychology 28 (2009) 56-65
43. London M., and Smither J.W. Feedback orientation, feedback culture and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review 12 (2002) 81-100
44. Mabe P.A., and West S.G. Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (1982) 280-296
45. Miller W.R., and Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. 2nd ed. (2002), Guilford Press, New York
46. Morgeson F.P., Mumford T.V., and Campion M.A. Coming full circle: Using research and practice to address 27 questions about 360-degree feedback programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Research and Practice 57 (2005) 196-209
47. Newton N.A., Khanna C., and Thompson J. Workplace failure: Mastering the last taboo. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 60 (2008) 227-245
48. Nowack K. Self-assessment and rater assessment as a dimension of management development. Human Resources Development Quarterly 3 (1992) 141-155
49. Nowack K. Congruence between self-other ratings as a predictor of assessment center performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 12 (1997) 145-166
50. Nowack K. Does 360-degree feedback negatively affect company performance: Feedback varies with your point of view. HR Magazine 47 (2002) 54-59
51. Nowack, K. (2005, March). Longitudinal evaluation of a 360-degree feedback program: Implications for best practices. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
52. Nowack K. Coaching for stress: StressScan. In: Passmore J. (Ed). Psychometrics in coaching: Using psychological and psychometric tools for development (2008), Kogan Page, London 254-274
53. Olivero G., Bane D., and Kopelman R. Executive coaching as a transfer of training tool: Effects on productivity in a public agency. Public Personnel Management 26 (1997) 461-469
54. Ostroff C., Atwater L., and Feinberg B. Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context and outcomes. Personnel Psychology 57 (2004) 333-375
55. Parks G.A., and Marlatt A. Relapse prevention therapy for substance-abusing offenders: A cognitive-behavioral approach in what works. In: Latessa E. (Ed). Strategic solutions: The International Community Corrections Association examines substance abuse (1999), American Correctional Association, Lanham, MD 161-233
56. Passmore J. Addressing deficit performance through coaching-Using motivational interviewing for performance improvement at work. International Coaching Psychology Review 2 (2007) 263-273
57. Pfau B., and Kay I. Does 360-degree feedback negatively affect company performance?. HR Magazine 47 (2002) 55-59
58. Porr D., and Fields D. Implicit leadership effects on multi-source ratings for management development. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21 (2006) 651-668
59. Prochaska J.O., and Velicer W.F. The transtheoretical model of health behaviour change. American Journal of Health Promotion 12 (1997) 38-48
60. Rehbine, N. (2007). The impact of 360-degree feedback on leadership development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
61. Reilly R.R., Smither J.W., and Vasilopoulos N.L. A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology 49 (1996) 599-612
62. Rhodes R.E., Plotnikoff R.C., and Courneya K.S. Predicting the physical activity intention-behavior profiles of adopters and maintainers using three social cognition models. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 36 (2008) 244-252
63. Roch S.G., Sternburgh A.M., and Caputo P.M. Absolute vs. relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15 (2007) 302-316
64. Schwartz, G. E., Schwartz, J. I., Nowack, K. M., & Eichling, P. S. (1993). The hardiness and the negative affectivity confound as a function of a defensive coping style. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona and Canyon Ranch.
65. Sedikides C., and Gregg A. Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (2003) 102-116
66. Seery M.D., Blascovich J., Weisbuch M., and Vick S.B. The relationship between self-esteem level, self-esteem stability, and cardiovascular reactions to performance feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 133-145
67. Smither J., London M., Flautt R., Vargas Y., and Kucine I. Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental field study. Personnel Psychology 56 (2003) 23-44
68. Smither J., London M., and Reilly R. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology 58 (2005) 33-66
69. Smither J., and Walker A.G. Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time?. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 575-581
70. Taylor S.E., and Brown J.D. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 193-210
71. Taylor P.J., Russ-Eft D.F., and Taylor H. Transfer of management training from alternate perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009) 104-121
72. Thach E. The impact of executive coaching and 360 feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 23 (2002) 205-214
73. Tolli A.P., and Schmidt A.M. The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008) 692-701
74. Tornow W.W. Perceptions of reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end?. Human Resource Management 32 (1993) 221-230
75. Wilson A.E., and Ross M. From chump to champ: People's appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 572-584
76. Woehr D.J., Sheehan M.K., and Bennett Jr. W. Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A multitrait-multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005) 592-600
77. Woo S., Sims C., Rupp D., and Gibbons A. Development engagement within and following developmental assessment centers: Considering feedback favorability and self-assessor agreement. Personnel Psychology 61 (2008) 727-759
78. Yammarino F., and Atwater L.E. Do managers see themselves as other see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resources management. Organizational Dynamics 25 (1997) 35-44