Congruence between self-other ratings and assessment center performance

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 145-166

  Nowack, Kenneth M ^a  

^a Organizational Performance Dimensions   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21744457906     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Antonioni, D. (1996, April). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
2. Ashford, S. (1989). Self assessments in organizations: A literature review and integrative model. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 133-174), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Atwater, L., & Yammarino, F. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
4. Atwater, L., Roush, P., & Fischthal, A. (1995). The influence of upward feedback on self- and follower ratings of leadership. Personnel Psychology, 48, 35-59.
5. Atwater, L., & Yammarino, F. (in press). Self-other rating agreement: A review and model. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management.
6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
7. Bass, B.M., & Yammarino, F. (1991). Congruence of self and other's leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40, 437-454.
8. Brannick, M.T., Michaels, C.E., & Baker, D.P. (1989). Construct validity of inbasket scores. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 957-963.
9. Bray, D.W., & Grant, D.L. (1966). The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management. Psychological Monographs, 80(17, Whole No. 625), 1-27.
10. Brutus, S., Fleenor, J.W., & Taylor, S. (1996, April). Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
11. Campbell, D., & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13, 302-314.
12. Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
13. DeNisi, A., & Shaw, J. (1977). Investigation of the uses of self-reports of abilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 641-644.
14. Edwards, A.L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
15. Farh, J., & Werbel, J. (1986). The effects of purpose of the appraisal and expectation of validation on self-appraisal leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 641-644.
16. Fedor, D., Rensvold, R., & Adams, S. (1992). An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology, 45, 779-805.
17. Gaugler, B.B., Rosenthal, D.B., Thornton, G.C., III, & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493-511.
18. Harris, M.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
19. Hazucha, J., Hezlett, S., & Schneider, R. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32, 325-351.
20. Hoffman, R. (1995, April). Ten reasons you should be using 360-degree feedback. HR magazine, 40, 82-85.
21. Kagan, J. (1988). The meanings of personality predicates. American Psychologist, 43, 614-620.
22. Klimoski, R.J., & Brice, T. (1991, April). The nature and impact of self-appraisals in a manufacturing environment. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.