Clicker satisfaction for students in human development: Differences for class type, prior exposure, and student talkativity

North American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 599-612

  Beckert, Troy E ^a   Fauth, Elizabeth ^a   Olsen, Kaelin ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949112891     PISSN: 15277143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamson, L. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, causes, pedagogy, and implications. In D. A. Banks (Ed.) Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases (pp. 1-25). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.
2. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Banks, D. (2006). Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases. London: Information Science Publishing.
4. th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
5. Barber, M., & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 1-8.
6. Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 474-494.
7. Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Center for Applied Research Bulletin, 3, 1-13.
8. Bransford, J., Brophy, S., & Williams, S. (2000). When computer technologies meet the learning sciences: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-84.
9. Caldwell, J. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
11. Cohen, M. (1991). Making class participation a reality. Political Science and Politics, 24(4), 699-703.
12. Deal, A. (2007). Classroom Response Systems. Teaching with Technology, 30, 1-14.
13. Draper, S., & Brown, M. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94.
14. Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
15. Hedley, R. A. (1994). Positive reinforcement now. Teaching Sociology, 22(4), 337-340.
16. Heward, W. (1994). "Three 'low-tech' strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction". In R. Gardner, III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Elshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.). Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
18. Kennedy, G. E., & Cutts, Q. I. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 260-268.
19. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students' attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257-274.
20. th annual convention of the Western Psychological Association, April 26, in Palm Springs, CA.
21. MacGeorge, E., Homan, S., Dunning, J., Elmore, D., Bodie, G., Evans, E., et al. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Education Technology Research Development, 56,125-145.
22. McKeachie, W. (1999). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
23. Nagy-Shadman, E., & Desrochers, C. (2008). Student response technology: Empirically grounded or just a gimmick? International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 1-44.
24. Poirier, C., & Feldman, R. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response techonology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 194-196.
25. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in San Diego, CA.
26. Simpson, V., & Martin, O. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 187-208.
27. Smith, D. H. (1992). Encouraging students' participation in large classes: A modest proposal. Teaching Sociology, 20(4), 337-339.
28. Stowell, J., & Nelson, J. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253-258.
29. Walberg, H. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed) Handbook of research on teaching, (pp. 214-229). New York: Macmillan.
30. Wood, M. (2006). Interactive response systems in higher education. In D. A. Banks (Ed.). Audience Response Systems in higher education: Applications and cases (pp. 305-320). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.