What special education directors say about RTI

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 245-254

  Werts, Margaret Gessler ^a   Lambert, Monica ^a   Carpenter, Ellen ^a  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949101285     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/27740376     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula, Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
2. Barnes, A. C., & Harlacher, J. E. (2008). Clearing the confusion: Response-to-intervention as a set of principles. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 417-431.
3. Bateman, B. (1965). An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorders: Vol. I (pp. 219-239). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
4. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85-95.
5. Bradley. R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2005). Response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 485-486.
6. Carney, K. J., & Stiefel, G. S. (2008). Long-term results of a problem-solving approach to.response to intervention: Discussion and implications. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6(2), 61-75.
7. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
8. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children. (2007). Thinking about response to intervention and learning disabilities: A teacher's guide. Arlington, VA: Author.
10. Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121-139.
11. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about the responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129-136.
12. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-228.
14. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness to intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
15. Haager, D., Klingner, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.
16. Healey, W. C. (2005). The learning disability phenomenon in pursuit of axioms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 115-118.
17. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 137-146.
18. Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2008). The role of special educators in a multitiered instructional system. Intervention in School and Clink, 43, 195-202.
19. Hosp, J. L. (2008). Curriculum-based measurement for mathematics: Assessment for effective intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 196-197.
20. Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act [IDEA] (2004). 20 U.S.C.A. 1400 et seq.
21. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Kavale, K. A., & Spaulding, L. S. (2008). Is Response to Intervention good policy for specific learning disability? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 169-179.
23. Kavale, K. A., Spaulding, L. S., & Beam, A. P. (2009). A time to define: Making the specific learning disability definition prescribe specific learning disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 39-48.
24. Kirk, S. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Kirk, S. A., & Bateman, B. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29, 73-78.
26. Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in Responsiveness to Intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539-544.
27. McDonnell, J., & O'Neill, R. (2003). A perspective on single/within subject research methods and "scientifically based research." Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 138-142.
28. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2008). Data tools: Search for public school districts, Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/datatools
29. O'Connor, R. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 43-54.
30. Proctor, B., & Prevatt, F. (2003). Agreement among four models used for diagnosing learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 459-466.
31. Reschly, D. J. (2005). LD identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510-515.
32. Reschly, D. J., & Hosp, J. L. (2004). State SLD identification policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 197-213.
33. Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 3-20). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
34. Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to Intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait to fail to watch them fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130-145.
35. Smith, A. (2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 126-132.
36. Stecker, P. M. (2006). Using curriculum-based measurement to monitor reading progressjnjnclusive elementary settings. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 91-97.
37. Stecker, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 128-134.
38. Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27, 10-17.
39. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in education. New York: Merrill.
40. Torgesen, J., Alexander, A., Wagner, R., Rashotte, C., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term out-comes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities 34, 33-58.
41. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225-256.
42. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
43. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1998). The case for early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 367-397.
44. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S., Chen, R., Pratt, A., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
45. Whitehurst, G. (2003). The Institute of Education Sciences: New wine, new bottles. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/director/ speeches2003/04-22/2003-04-22a.asp
46. Willson, V. L. (1987). Statistical and psychometric issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3(1), 24-28.
47. Zigmond, N. (1993). Learning disabilities from an educational perspective. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 251-272). Baltimore: Brookes.