Clearing the confusion: Response-to-intervention as a set of principles

Education and Treatment of Children

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 417-431

  Barnes, Aaron C ^a   Harlacher, Jason E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949108372     PISSN: 07488491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. rd ed. (pp 328-375). NY: MacMillan Publishing.
2. Brown-Childsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
3. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, March/April 2004, 90-104.
4. Coyne, M. D., & Harn, B. (2006). Promoting beginning reading success through meaningful assessment of early literacy skills. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 33-43.
5. Cummings, K. (2006, November). Research and theory into practice. Paper presented at the Oregon RTI summit: Scaling-up response to intervention in schools, Eugene, OR.
6. Deno, S. L. (2002). Problem solving as "best practice". In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 37-56). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
7. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, Sept/Oct 2005, 57-61.
8. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-227.
9. th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
10. Gresham, F.M., VanDerHeyden, A., & Witt, J.C. (2005). Response to intervention in the identification of learning disabilities: Empirical support and future challenges.
11. Harn. B. (2006, November). Understanding the core components of RTI: Taking stock of what's in place & planning for next steps. Paper presented at the Oregon RTI summit: Scaling-up response to intervention in schools, Eugene, OR.
12. Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation. Belmont, CA; Wadsworth.
13. Idaho State Department of Education. (no date). Idaho reading indicator. http://www.sde.state.id.us/IRI.
14. Ikeda, M. J., Grimes, J., Tilly III, W. D., Allison, R., Kurns, S., & Stumme, J. (2002). Implementing an intervention-based approach to service delivery: A case example. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 53-69). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
15. Kame'enui, E. J., Good, R., & Harn, B. A. (2005). Beginning reading failure and the quantification of risk: Reading behavior as the supreme index. In W. L. Heward and colleagues (Eds), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 69-89). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16. Kovaleski, J. F. (2002). Best practices in operating pre-referral intervention teams. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (645-656). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
17. Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E. Morrow, H., & Swank, R. R. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity, Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170-183.
18. Marston, D. Muysklens, P., Lau, M., & Carter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187-200.
19. Marston, D., Reschly, A., Lau, M. Y., Muyskens, P., & Canter, A. (2007). Historical perspectives and current trends in problem solving: The Minneapolis story. In D. Haager, J. Klinger, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (265-285). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
20. Montgomery, P., & Ilk, M. (2007). Reaching the peak with DIBELS, data, and determination. Presentation at the 2007 DIBELS Summit. Santa Ana Pueblo, NM.
21. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2006). Response to Intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: NASDSE, Inc.
22. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities.
23. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
24. Reschly, D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510-515.
25. Rockley, J., Baker, J., & Bechtel, S. (2007). Coaching for special education and general education. Presentation at the 2007 DIBELS summit. Santa Ana Pueblo, NM.
26. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
27. Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E. J., Good, R. H., Harn, B. A., Cole, C., & Braun, D. (2002). Building, implementing, and sustaining a beginning reading improvement model school by school and lessons learned. In M. Shinn, G. Stoner, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches (pp. 537-569). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
28. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
29. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Woodruff, A. L., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2007). Prevention and early identification of students with reading disabilities. In D. Haager, J. Klinger, & S.Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (11-27). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
30. th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.