The epidemiology of contact allergy: Allergen exposure and recent trends

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia

Volumn 144, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 507-514

  Thyssen, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dermatitis, allergic contact; Dermatitis, contact; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; ALLERGEN; BRONOPOL; CHROMIUM; COBALT; COSMETIC; DIAZOLIDINYL UREA; DISULFIRAM; FERROUS SULFATE; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; HAIR DYE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; ISOEUGENOL; ISOTHIAZOLONE; METAL; NICKEL; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; PRESERVATIVE; QUATERNIUM 15; RUBBER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BODY PIERCING; CONSTRUCTION WORK; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; EXPOSURE; FACE; FINLAND; GLOVE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HAIR; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; JEWELRY; LEATHER INDUSTRY; MOBILE PHONE; MYROXYLON; MYROXYLON PEREIRAE; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGY; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; READING; REVIEW; SENSITIZATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SWELLING; TATTOO;

EID: 73849151012     PISSN: 03920488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Dotterud LK, Smith-Sivertsen T. Allergic contact sensitization in the general adult population: a population-based study from Northern Norway. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:10-5.
2. Nielsen NH, Menne T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol 1992;72:456-60.
3. Schafer T, Bohler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Filipiak B et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 2001;56:1192-6.
4. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population - prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:287-99.
5. Mirshahpanah P, Maibach HI. Relationship of patch test positivity in a general versus an eczema population. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:125-30.
6. Uter W, Ludwig A, Balda BR, Schnuch A, Pfahlberg A, Schafer T et al. The prevalence of contact allergy differed between population-based and clinic-based data. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:627-32.
7. Calnan CD. Nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1956;68:229-36.
8. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Menne T. Contact allergy epidemics and their controls. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:185-95.
9. Brandrup F, Larsen SF. Nickel dermatitis provoked by buttons in blue jeans. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:148-50.
10. Boss A, Menne T. Nickel sensitization from ear piercing. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:211-3.
11. Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I. Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earrings. Contact Dermatitis 1984;10:39-41.
12. Agner T, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Frosch P et al. Hand eczema severity and quality of life: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of hand eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:43-7.
13. Bryld LE, Hindsberger C, Kyvik KO, Agner T, Menne T. Risk factors influencing the development of hand eczema in a population-based twin sample. Br J Dermatol 2003;149:1214-20.
14. Liden C, Rondell E, Skare L, Nalbanti A. Nickel release from tools on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:127-31.
15. Liden C, Skare L, Nise G, Vahter M. Deposition of nickel, chromium, and cobalt on the skin in some occupations - assessment by acid wipe sampling. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:347-54.
16. Novak N, Baurecht H, Schafer T, Rodriguez E, Wagenpfeil S, Klopp N et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene and allergic contact sensitization to nickel. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:1430-5.
17. Thyssen JP, Carlsen BC, Menne T. Nickel sensitization, hand eczema, and loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene. Dermatitis 2008;19:303-7.
18. European Communities. European Dir. 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Dir. 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities 1994;37:1-2.
19. Commission Directive 2004/96/EC of 27 September 2004 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of nickel for piercing post assemblies for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress. Official Journal of the European Union 2004;9:301-2.
20. Pazzaglia M, Lucente P, Vincenzi C, Tosti A. Contact dermatitis from nickel in mobile phones. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:362-3.
21. Wohrl S, Jandl T, Stingl G, Kinaciyan T. Mobile telephone as new source for nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:113.
22. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Mobile phones are now covered by the European Union Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis [In press].
23. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Zachariae C, Menne T. The outcome of dimethylglyoxime testing in a sample of cell phones in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:38-42.
24. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Volund A, Menne T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:636-42.
25. Johansen J, Menne T, Christophersen J, Kaaber K, Veien N. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:490-5.
26. Schnuch A, Uter W. Decrease in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:107-8.
27. Thyssen JP, Hald M, Avnstorp C, Veien N, Lauerberg G, Nielsen NH et al. Characteristics of nickel allergic dermatitis patients seen in private dermatology clinics in Denmark: a questionnaire study. Acta Derm Venereol [In press].
28. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Reduced nickel sensitivity in young Danish women following regulation of nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:104-6.
29. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Carlsen BC, Menne T. Prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy among female dermatitis patients before and after Danish government regulation: a 23-year retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol [In press].
30. Liden C, Norberg K. Nickel on the Swedish market. Follow-up after implementation of the Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:29-35.
31. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Menné T, Nielsen N H, Linneberg A. Nickel allergy in Danish women before and after nickel regulation. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2259-60.
32. Cheng TY, Tseng YH, Sun CC, Chu CY. Contact sensitization to metals in Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:353-60.
33. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, Warshaw EM, Belsito D, DeLeo VA, Maibach HI et al. Detection of nickel sensitivity has increased in North American patch-test patients. Dermatitis 2008;19:16-9.
34. Jacob SE, Moennich JN, McKean BA, Zirwas MJ, Taylor JS. Nickel allergy in the United States: a public health issue in need of a "nickel directive". J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:1067-9.
35. Lu LK, Warshaw EM, Dunnick CA. Prevention of nickel allergy: the case for regulation? Dermatol Clin 2009;27:155-vii.
36. Meijer C, Bredberg M, Fischer T, Widstrom L. Ear piercing, and nickel and cobalt sensitization, in 520 young Swedish men doing compulsory military service. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:147-9.
37. Ruff CA, Belsito DV. The impact of various patient factors on contact allergy to nickel, cobalt, and Chromate. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:32-9.
38. Hindsen M, Persson L, Gruvberger B. Allergic contact dermatitis from cobalt in jewellery. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:350-1.
39. Bordel-Gomez MT, Miranda-Romero A, Castrodeza-Sanz J. Isolated and concurrent prevalence of sensitization to transition metals in a Spanish population. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:1452-7.
40. Goon AT, Goh CL. Metal allergy in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:130-2.
41. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Fransway AF, Maibach HI et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004;15:176-83.
42. Nielsen NH, Linneberg A, Menne T, Madsen F, Frolund L, Dirksen A et al. Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population: two cross-sectional surveys eight years apart (the Copenhagen Allergy Study). Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:31-4.
43. Jäeger H, Pelloni E. Test épicutanés aux bichromates, positifs dans l'eczema au ciment. Dermatologica 1950;100:207-15.
44. Avnstorp C. Risk factors for cement eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:81-8.
45. Burckhardt W, Frenk E, de SD, Paschoud JM, Szadurski J, Schwarz K. Decrease of the eczematous effect of cement by ferrous sulphate. Dermatologica 1971;142:271-3.
46. Avnstorp C. Follow-up of workers from the prefabricated concrete industry after the addition of ferrous sulphate to Danish cement. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:365-71.
47. Zachariae CO, Agner T, Menne T. Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:83-5.
48. Estlander T. Occupational skin disease in Finland. Observations made during 1974-1988 at the Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1990;155:1-85.
49. Boonchai W, Iamtharachai P, Sunthonpalin P. Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis in Thailand. Dermatitis 2008;19:142-5.
50. Thyssen JP, Jensen P, Carlsen BC, Engkilde K, Menne T, Johansen JD. The prevalence of chromium allergy in Denmark is currently increasing as a result of leather exposure. Br J Dermatol 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
51. Nguyen SH, Dang TP, MacPherson C, Maibach H, Maibach HI. Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multicentre population in North America (NACDG). Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:101-6.
52. Asian A. Determination of heavy metal toxicity of finished leather solid waste. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2009;82:633-8.
53. Hansen MB, Menne T, Johansen JD. Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in leather and elicitation of eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:278-82.
54. BfR - Federal Institute for Risk Assessement, Berlin, Germany. [Accessed and cited 2009 September 7]. Available at: http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/9575.
55. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menne T, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE et al. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:279-87.
56. Rastogi SC, Lepoittevin JP, Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menne T, Bruze M et al. Fragrances and other materials in deodorants: search for potentially sensitizing molecules using combined GC-MS and structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:293-303.
57. Thyssen JP, Menne T, Linneberg A, Johansen JD. Contact sensitization to fragrances in the general population: a Koch's approach may reveal the burden of disease. Br J Dermatol 2009;160:729-35.
58. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:352-8.
59. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menne T. Allergic contact dermatitis in humans - experimental and quantitative aspects. In: Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 189-98.
60. Lim JT, Goh CL, Ng SK, Wong WK. Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:321-6.
61. Lunder T, Kansky A. Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch-test results 1989-1998. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:107-9.
62. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Fransway AF, Maibach HI et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:272-3.
63. Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT, Holloway D, Rycroft RJ, White IR et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population overa 17-year period. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:279-83.
64. Nardelli A, Carbonez A, Ottoy W, Drieghe J, Goossens A. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:134-41.
65. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:65-76.
66. Thyssen JP, Carlsen BC, Menne T, Johansen JD. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:238-44.
67. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, Nielsen NH, Johansen JD. The prevalence and morbidity of sensitization to fragrance mix I in the general population. Br J Dermatol 2009;161:95-101.
68. Tudela E, MacPherson C, Maibach HI. Long-term trend in patch test reactions: a 32-year statistical overview (1970-2002), part II. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008;27:187-202.
69. White JM, White IR, Glendinning A, Fleming J, Jefferies D, Basketter DA et al. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:580-2.
70. Buckley DA. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:295-300.
71. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Svedman C, Bruze M, Bernard G, Gimenez-Arnau E et al. Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose-response elicitation study. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:180-4.
72. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Bossi R. Selected important fragrance sensitizers in perfumes - current exposures. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:201-4.
73. Frosch PJ, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, Brinkmeier T, Andersen KE, Bruze M et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:216-25.
74. Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A. Experiences with the fragrance mix II the German perspective. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(Suppl.1):12.
75. Shab A, Scheidt R, Weisshaar E, Diepgen TL. Fragrance allergy in three different samples. Contact Dermatitis 2008.
76. Hair products.com. [cited 2009 September 7]. Available at: http://www.hairproducts.com/hair-color-loreal-clairol.html.
77. Kline and Company Incorporated. Salon Hair Care USA 2003. Little Falls, NJ: Kline and Company, Inc.; 2004.
78. Sosted H, Hesse U, Menne T, Andersen KE, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview-based study. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:132-5.
79. White JM, Gilmour NJ, Jeffries D, Duangdeeden I, Kullavanijaya P, Basketter DA et al. A general population from Thailand: incidence of common allergens with emphasis on para-phenylenediamine. Clin Exp Allergy 2007;37:1848-53.
80. Thyssen JP, White JM. Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:327-43.
81. Hasan T, Rantanen T, Alanko K, Harvima RJ, Jolanki R, Kalimo K et al. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland - a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:40-5.
82. Hoeller OD, Vens N, Merk HF, Schroeder CM. [Contact allergens in the standard patch test series from 1980-2004 at the University Clinic Aachen]. Hautarzt 2005;56:1125-32.
83. Lindberg M, Edman B, Fischer T, Stenberg B. Time trends in Swedish patch test data from 1992 to 2000. A multi-centre study based on age-and sex-adjusted results of the Swedish standard series. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:205-10.
84. Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Sensitivity to paraphenylenediamine in Warsaw (Poland). Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:347-48.
85. Thyssen JP, Carlsen BC, Sosted H, Menne T, Johansen JD. Frequency of p-phenylenediamine (PPD) sensitization among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Contact Dermatitis 2009 [In press].
86. Thyssen JP, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Diepgen TL, Gimenez-Arnau E, Goncalo M et al. p-phenylenediamine (PPD) sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2009;60:314-9.
87. Patel S, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP et al. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow-up over the last 6 years. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:35-7.
88. Flyvholm MA. Preservatives in registered chemical products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:27-32.
89. Lundov MD, Moesby L, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: a review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2009;60:70-8.
90. Menne T, Hjorth N. Routine patch testing with paraben esters. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:189-91.
91. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M et al. Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:207-10.
92. Jong CT, Statham BN, Green CM, King CM, Gawkrodger DJ, Sansom JE et al. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in the UK, 2004-2005: results of multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:165-8.
93. Bjorkner B, Bruze M, Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Persson K. Contact allergy to the preservative Kathon CG. Contact Dermatitis 1986;14:85-90.
94. Hannuksela M. Rapid increase in contact allergy to Kathon CG in Finland. Contact Dermatitis 1986;15:211-4.
95. Tosti A. Prevalence and sources of Kathon CG sensitization in Italy. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:173-4.
96. Johansen JD, Veien N, Laurberg G, Avnstorp C, Kaaber K, Andersen KE et al. Decreasing trends in methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy following regulatory intervention. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:48-51.
97. Knudsen B, Lerbaek A, Johansen JD, Menne T. Reduction in the frequency of sensitization to thiurams. A result of legislation? Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:170-1.
98. Sertoli A, Francalanci S, Acciai MC, Gola M. Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali). Am J Contact Dermat 1999;10:18-30.99.