Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 327-343

  Thyssen, Jacob Pontoppidan ^a   White, Jonathan M L ^b  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contact allergy; Epidemics; p phenylenediamine; Patch test; PPD

Indexed keywords

HAIR DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ASIAN; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATITIS; HUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; REVIEW;

ASIA; COLORING AGENTS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EUROPE; FACIAL DERMATOSES; FEMALE; HAIR PREPARATIONS; HUMANS; MALE; NORTH AMERICA; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS; SCALP DERMATOSES;

EID: 57449117912     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01427.x     Document Type: Review

References (161)

1. Cathelineau H. Note sur 18 cases d'accidents provoques par teinture pour cheveux á base de chlorhydrate de PPD (Generic). Bull Soc Franc Syph 1898 : 9 : 28 35.
2. Thyssen J P, Johansen J D, Menné T. Contact allergy epidemics and their controls. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 185 195.
3. Fregert S. [Chemical demonstration of paraphenylene diamine in hair dyes]. Hautarzt 1972 : 23 : 393 394.
4. Hair Colour. Available from http://www.hairproducts.com/hair-color- loreal-clairol.html. Accessed on 1 July 2008.
5. Søsted H, Hesse U, Menné T, Andersen K E, Johansen J D. Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview-based study. Br J Dermatol 2005 : 153 : 132 135.
6. Kline and Company Incorporated. Salon Hair Care USA, 2003 (Report). Little Falls, NJ, Kline and Company, Inc., 2004.
7. McFadden J P, White I R, Frosch P J, Sosted H, Johansen J D, Menné T. Allergy to hair dye. BMJ 2007 : 334 : 220.
8. Spoor H J. Hair coloring - a resume. Cutis 1977 : 20 : 311 313.
9. Burry J N, Kirk J, Reid J G, Turner T. Environmental dermatitis: patch tests in 1,000 cases of allergic contact dermatitis. Med J Aust 1973 : 2 : 681 685.
10. Moriearty P L, Pereira C, Guimaraes N A. Contact dermatitis in Salvador, Brazil. Contact Dermatitis 1978 : 4 : 185 189.
11. Olumide Y M. Contact dermatitis in Nigeria. Contact Dermatitis 1985 : 12 : 241 246.
12. Yedomon H G, Fayomi E B, Do Ango P F, Zohoun T. [Contact eczema and allergens: an analysis of the preliminary results of patch tests in the Dermatology Service of the National Hospital and University Center in Cotonou]. Odontostomatol Trop 1998 : 21 : 19 23.
13. Rudner E J. North American Group results. Contact Dermatitis 1977 : 3 : 208 209.
14. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/spb/mnpages/glossary.htm (Generic), 2006.
15. Patel S, Basketter D A, Jefferies D, White I R, Rycroft R J, McFadden J P, Ho S Y. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 35 37.
16. Lindberg M, Edman B, Fischer T, Stenberg B. Time trends in Swedish patch test data from 1992 to 2000. A multi-centre study based on age- and sex-adjusted results of the Swedish standard series. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 205 210.
17. Thyssen J P, Carlsen B C, Sosted H, Menné T, Johansen J D. Frequency of p-phenylenediamine (PPD) sensitization among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Contact Dermatitis 2008 : 59 : 184 185.
18. Hoeller O D, Vens N, Merk H F, Schroeder C M. [Contact allergens in the standard patch test series from 1980-2004 at the University Clinic Aachen]. Hautarzt 2005 : 56 : 1125 1132.
19. Hasan T, Rantanen T, Alanko K et al. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland - a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 40 45.
20. Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Sensitivity to para-phenylenediamine in Warsaw (Poland). Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 57 : 347 348.
21. Jonker M J, Bruynzeel D P. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis 2000 : 42 : 330 335.
22. Geier J, Gefeller O, Wiechmann K, Fuchs T. Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6. Contact Dermatitis 1999 : 40 : 119 126.
23. Hillen U, Jappe U, Frosch P J et al. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol 2006 : 154 : 665 670.
24. Thyssen J P, Menné T, Nielsen N H, Linneberg A. Is there a risk of active sensitization to PPD by patch testing the general population? Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 57 : 133 134.
25. Dawe S A, White I R, Rycroft R J, Basketter D A, McFadden J P. Active sensitization to para-phenylenediamine and its relevance: a 10-year review. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 51 : 96 97.
26. Chan Y C, Ng S K, Goh C L. Positive patch-test reactions to para-phenylenediamine, their clinical relevance and the concept of clinical tolerance. Contact Dermatitis 2001 : 45 : 217 220.
27. Sosted H, Menné T. Allergy to 3-nitro-p-hydroxyethylaminophenol and 4-amino-3-nitrophenol in a hair dye. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 317 319.
28. Sosted H, Nielsen N H, Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis to the hair dye ingredient 6-methoxy-2-methylamino-3-aminopyridine HCl also called HC Blue no.7, without cross-sensitivity to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2008 (in press).
29. Goh C L. Comparative study of TRUE test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 27 : 84 89.
30. Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, Trattner A. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 140 145.
31. Dickel H, Taylor J S, Evey P, Merk H F. Delayed readings of a standard screening patch test tray: frequency of 'lost,' 'found,' and 'persistent' reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 2000 : 11 : 213 217.
32. Wilkinson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970 : 50 : 287 292.
33. Devos S A, Van D V. The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2001 : 44 : 273 275.
34. Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1969 : 55 : 17 35.
35. Krob H A, Fleischer A B Jr., D'Agostino R Jr., Haverstock C L, Feldman S. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004 : 51 : 349 353.
36. Ho S G, Basketter D A, Jefferies D, Rycroft R J, White I R, McFadden J P. Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol 2005 : 153 : 364 367.
37. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D. [Contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine: a 10-year observation held in the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz]. Med Pr 2007 : 58 : 215 222.
38. Dooms-Goossens A. Textile dye dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 27 : 321 323.
39. Goon A T, Gilmour N J, Basketter D A, White I R, Rycroft R J, McFadden J P. High frequency of simultaneous sensitivity to disperse orange 3 in patients with positive patch tests to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 248 250.
40. Seidenari S, Mantovani L, Manzini B M, Pignatti M. Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compound. A study of 236 azo-dye-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1997 : 36 : 91 96.
41. Seidenari S, Giusti F, Massone F, Mantovani L. Sensitization to disperse dyes in a patch test population over a five-year period. Am J Contact Dermat 2002 : 13 : 101 107.
42. Nardelli A, Taveirne M, Drieghe J, Carbonez A, Degreef H, Goossens A. The relation between the localization of foot dermatitis and the causative allergens in shoes: a 13-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 201 206.
43. Hatch K L, Maibach H I. Textile dye dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995 : 32 : 631 639.
44. Xie Z, Hayakawa R, Sugiura M, Kojima H, Konishi H, Ichihara G, Takeuchi Y. Experimental study on skin sensitization potencies and cross-reactivities of hair-dye-related chemicals in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 2000 : 42 : 270 275.
45. Rietschel R L, Mathias C G, Fowler J F Jr. et al. Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2002 : 13 : 170 176.
46. Fan W X, Zhao B. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1990 : 38 : 158 161.
47. Sharma V K, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh India. a study of 200 patients with the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1998 : 38 : 127 131.
48. Wang W H, Li L F, Lu X Y, Wang J. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 314 319.
49. Baer R L, Lipkin G, Kanof N B, Biondi E. Changing patterns of sensitivity to common contact allergens. Arch Dermatol 1964 : 89 : 3 8.
50. Kanan M W. Contact dermatitis in Kuwait. J Kuwait Med Assoc 1969 : 3 : 129 144.
51. Hirano S, Yoshikawa K. Patch testing with European and American standard allergens in Japanese patients. Contact Dermatitis 1982 : 8 : 48 50.
52. Goh C L. Epidemiology of contact allergy in Singapore. Int J Dermatol 1988 : 27 : 308 311.
53. Lim J T, Goh C L, Ng S K, Wong W K. Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 26 : 321 326.
54. Lee T Y, Lam T H. Patch testing in Hong Kong. Contact Dermatitis 1989 : 21 : 148 153.
55. Lee T Y, Lam T H. Patch testing of 490 patients in Hong Kong. Contact Dermatitis 1996 : 35 : 23 26.
56. Zhang X M, Niklasson B, Li S Y. Patch testing in cases of eczema and dermatitis in Beijing, China. Contact Dermatitis 1991 : 25 : 224 229.
57. Liu Y Q, Zhao B, Zhuang L H, Fan W X. Path test reactions to the Chinese standard screening allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 1997 : 8 : 141 143.
58. Lestringant G G, Bener A, Sawaya M, Galadari I H, Frossard P M. Allergic contact dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Dermatol 1999 : 38 : 181 186.
59. Wang X M, Lin Y F, Cheng X F, Zhang Y P, Ye M L. Patch testing with the European standard series in Shanghai. Contact Dermatitis 1994 : 30 : 173 174.
60. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002 : 46 : 17 23.
61. Akyol A, Boyvat A, Peksari Y, Gurgey E. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 333 337.
62. Okrasinski H, Gul V F. Allergic contact dermatitis in the Asir region of Saudi Arabia: a pilot study. Ann Saudi Med 1995 : 15 : 478 480.
63. el-Rab M O, al-Sheikh O A. Is the European standard series suitable for patch testing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia? Contact Dermatitis 1995 : 33 : 310 314.
64. al-Sheikh O A, Gad el-Rab M O. Allergic contact dermatitis: clinical features and profile of sensitizing allergens in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Dermatol 1996 : 35 : 493 497.
65. Lam W S, Chan L Y, Ho S C, Chong L Y, So W H, Wong T W. A retrospective study of 2585 patients patch tested with the European standard series in Hong Kong (1995-99). Int J Dermatol 2008 : 47 : 128 133.
66. Freireich-Astman M, David M, Trattner A. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 103 107.
67. Lazarov A. European standard series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004. Contact Dermatitis 2006 : 55 : 73 76.
68. Singhal V, Reddy B S. Common contact sensitizers in Delhi. J Dermatol 2000 : 27 : 440 445.
69. Akhtar N, Rashid M M, Chowdhury A Q, Ali E, Chowdhury A M. Patch test for the detection of contact allergens. Mymensingh Med J 2004 : 13 : 181 184.
70. Hussain I, Rani Z, Rashid T, Haroon T S. Suitability of the European standard series of patch test allergens in Pakistani patients. Contact Dermatitis 2002 : 46 : 50 51.
71. Kashani M N, Gorouhi F, Behnia F, Nazemi M J, Dowlati Y, Firooz A. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 52 : 154 158.
72. Onder M, Oztas M O. Contact dermatitis in the elderly. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 232 233.
73. Sharma V K, Sethuraman G, Garg T, Verma K K, Ramam M. Patch testing with the Indian standard series in New Delhi. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 51 : 319 321.
74. Magen E, Mishal J, Schlesinger M. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel. Contact Dermatitis 2006 : 55 : 370 371.
75. Li L F, Guo J, Wang J. Environmental contact factors in eczema and the results of patch testing Chinese patients with a modified European standard series of allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 51 : 22 25.
76. Li L F, Liu G, Wang J. Prevalence and 1-year outcome of facial allergic contact dermatitis in patients patch tested in a University Hospital. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 57 : 187 190.
77. Bajaj A K, Saraswat A, Mukhija G, Rastogi S, Yadav S. Patch testing experience with 1000 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007 : 73 : 313 318.
78. Skog E, Thyresson N. The occupational significance of some common contact allergens. Acta Derm Venereol 1953 : 33 : 65 74.
79. Modée J, Skog E. A comparison of results of patch testing in 1951 and in 1961. Acta Derm Venereol 1962 : 42 : 280 289.
80. Marcussen P V. Variations in the incidence of contact hypersensitivities. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1962 : 48 : 40 48.
81. Magnusson B, Blohm S G, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Hovding G, Pirila V, Skog E. Routine patch testing. IV. Supplementary series of test substances for Scandinavian countries. Acta Derm Venereol. 1968 : 48 : 110 114.
82. Oleffe J, Nopp-Oger M J, Achten G. [European battery of skin tests - results of 300 observations]. Berufsdermatosen 1972 : 20 : 209 217.
83. Rudzki E, Kleniewska D. The epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Poland. Br J Dermatol 1970 : 83 : 543 545.
84. Brun R. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Geneva (1000 cases). Contact Dermatitis 1975 : 1 : 214 217.
85. Brun R. [Evolution of contact dermatitis factors in a population. Epidemiology 1975-1981]. Dermatologica 1982 : 165 : 24 29.
86. Lammer D. [Test results in 1008 patients with contact allergy]. Z Hautkr 1979 : 54 : 571 579.
87. Romaguera C, Grimalt F. Statistical and comparative study of 4600 patients tested in Barcelona (1973-1977). Contact Dermatitis 1980 6 : 309 315.
88. Hammershoy O. Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive Danish patient from 1973 to 1977. Contact Dermatitis 1980 : 6 : 263 268.
89. Panconesi E, Sertoli A, Fabbri P, Cortini S. Computer data on patch tests of 688 eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 1975 : 1 : 317 318.
90. Stransky L, Krasteva M. Changing patterns of contact sensitivity in Sofia. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1989 : 37 : 214 216.
91. Husain S L. Contact dermatitis in the west of Scotland. Contact Dermatitis 1977 : 3 : 327 332.
92. Camarasa J M. First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979 : 59 33 37.
93. Calas E, Castelain P Y, Piriou A. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Marseilles (Author's Transl)]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1978 : 105 : 345 347.
94. Lachapelle J M, Tennstedt D. Epidemiological survey of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands in Belgium. Contact Dermatitis 1979 : 5 : 244 248.
95. Korossy S, Nebenfuhrer L, Vincze E. [Frequency, relevance and latency of chemical allergy in hospitalized patients in Budapest]. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1983 : 31 : 39 44.
96. Gollhausen R, Enders F, Przybilla B, Burg G, Ring J. Trends in allergic contact sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1988 : 18 : 147 154.
97. Dooms-Goossens A. A computerized retrieval system of contact allergenic substances. Semin Dermatol 1986 : 5 : 249 254.
98. Edman B, Moller H. Trends and forecasts for standard allergens in a 12-year patch test material. Contact Dermatitis 1982 : 8 : 95 104.
99. Vestey J P, Gawkrodger D J, Wong W K, Buxton P K. An analysis of 501 consecutive contact clinic consultations. Contact Dermatitis 1986 : 15 : 119 125.
100. Young E, Houwing R H. Patch test results with standard allergens over a decade. Contact Dermatitis 1987 : 17 : 104 107.
101. Sertoli A, Francalanci S, Acciai M C, Gola M. Epidemiological Survey of Contact Dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti Da Contatto e Ambientali). Am J Contact Dermat. 1999 10 : 18 30.
102. Guerra L, Bardazzi F, Tosti A. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers' clients. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 26 : 108 111.
103. Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghoj P et al. Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis 1989 : 21 : 291 299.
104. Broeckx W, Blondeel A, Dooms-Goossens A, Achten G. Cosmetic intolerance. Contact Dermatitis 1987 : 16 : 189 194.
105. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J, Gollhausen R. Patch test results in 1987 compared to trends from the period 1977-1983. Contact Dermatitis 1989 : 20 : 230 232.
106. Bruckner-Tuderman L, Konig A, Schnyder U W. Patch test results of the Dermatology Clinic Zurich in 1989: personal computer-aided statistical evaluation. Dermatology 1992 : 184 : 29 33.
107. Bangha E, Elsner P. Sensitizations to allergens of the European standard series at the Department of Dermatology in Zurich 1990-1994. Dermatology 1996 : 193 : 17 21.
108. Shehade S A, Beck M H, Hillier V F. Epidemiological survey of standard series patch test results and observations on day 2 and day 4 readings. Contact Dermatitis 1991 : 24 : 119 122.
109. Monk B E. Patch testing in a British District General Hospital. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999 : 24 : 484 486.
110. Castiglioni G, Carosso A, Manzoni S, Nebiolo F, Bugiani M. Results of routine patch testing of 834 patients in Turin. Contact Dermatitis 1992 : 27 : 182 185.
111. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch P J. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998 : 8 : 36 40.
112. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W et al. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 1997 : 37 : 200 209.
113. Koopmans A K, Bruynzeel D P. Is PPD a useful screening agent? Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 89 92.
114. Kranke B, Binder M, Derhaschnig J, Komericki P, Pirkhammer D, Ziegler V, Aberer W. [Patch testing with the patch testing. 'Austrian Standard Series' - epidemiologic test values and results]. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1995 : 107 : 323 330.
115. Heine G, Schnuch A, Uter W, Worm M. Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the information network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2004 : 51 : 111 117.
116. Serra-Baldrich E, Lluch M, Valero A, Malet A, Gimenez Camarasa J M. Contact dermatitis: clinical review of 800 patients tested using the standard European series. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995 : 23 : 67 72.
117. Armstrong D K, Jones A B, Smith H R, Ross J S, White I R, Rycroft R J, McFadden J P. Occupational sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: a 17-year review. Contact Dermatitis 1999 : 41 : 348 349.
118. Britton J E, Wilkinson S M, English J S, Gawkrodger D J, Ormerod A D, Sansom J E, Shaw S, Statham B. The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance. Br J Dermatol 2003 : 148 : 259 264.
119. Bruynzeel D P, Diepgen T L, Andersen K E et al. Monitoring the European standard series in 10 Centres 1996-2000. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 146 149.
120. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 2003 : 48 : 280 282.
121. Machovcova A, Dastychova E, Kostalova D, Vojtechovska A, Reslova J, Smejkalova D, Vaneckova J, Vocilkova A. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 162 166.
122. Hansen S R, Kroon S. [Patch testing and nickel allergy]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2008 : 128 : 433 435.
123. Worm M, Brasch J, Geier J, Uter W, Schnuch A. [Patch testing with the DKG standard series 2001-2004. Results from the IVDK]. Hautarzt 2005 : 56 : 1114 1124.
124. Uter W, Hegewald J, Aberer W et al. The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003 - first results of the European surveillance system on contact allergies. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 136 145.
125. Uter W for The European Surveillance System of Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Results of patch testing the standard series, 2004. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008 22 : 174 181.
126. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to hairdressing allergens in female hairdressers and clients - current data from the IVDK, 2003-2006. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007 : 5 : 993 1001.
127. Epstein E, Rees W J, Maibach H I. Recent experience with routine patch test screening. Arch Dermatol 1968 : 98 : 18 22.
128. Baer R L, Ramsey D L. Common sensitizing contact allergens. JAMA 1973 : 225 : 296 297.
129. Kanof N B, Biondi E. Routine screening patch test results: 1970-1974. Cutis 1976 : 18 : 668 669.
130. Lepine E M. Results of routine office patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1976 : 2 : 89 91.
131. Rudner E J, Clendenning W, Epstein E et al. The frequency of contact sensitivity in North America 1972-74. Contact Dermatitis 1975 : 1 : 277 280.
132. Lynde C W, Warshawski L, Mitchell J C. Screening patch tests in 4190 eczema patients 1972-81. Contact Dermatitis 1982 : 8 : 417 421.
133. Nethercott J R. Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 1982 : 8 : 389 395.
134. Hogan D J, Hill M, Lane P R. Results of routine patch testing of 542 patients in Saskatoon, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 1988 : 19 : 120 124.
135. Storrs F J, Rosenthal L E, Adams R M et al. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America - 1984 to 1985. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989 : 20 : 1038 1045.
136. Nethercott J R, Holness D L, Adams R M et al. Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: I. frequency of response. Am J Contact Dermat 1991 : 2 : 122 129.
137. Albert M R, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez E. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Am J Contact Dermat 1998 : 9 : 207 211.
138. Marks J G, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am J Contact Dermat 1995 : 6 : 160 165.
139. Marks J G, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998 : 38 : 911 918.
140. Marks J G Jr., Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol 2000 : 136 : 272 273.
141. Marks J G Jr., Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003 : 14 : 59 62.
142. Wetter D A, Davis M D, Yiannias J A et al. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005 : 53 : 416 421.
143. Mohammad A H, Cohen S, Hadi S. Patch testing: a retrospective analysis of 103 patients with emphasis on practical aspects for the clinician. Skinmed 2005 : 4 : 340 344.
144. Pratt M D, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004 : 15 : 176 183.
145. Davis M D, Scalf L A, Yiannias J A et al. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005. Arch Dermatol 2008 : 144 : 67 72.
146. Sipos K. Chemical hypersensitivity and dermatological diseases. Dermatologica 1967 : 135 : 421 432.
147. Forsbeck M, Skog E, Ytterborn K H. Delayed type of allergy and atopic disease among twins. Acta Derm Venereol 1968 : 48 : 192 197.
148. Magnusson B, Moller H. Contact allergy without skin disease. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979 : 59 113 115.
149. Seidenari S, Manzini B M, Danese P, Motolese A. Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1990 : 23 : 162 167.
150. Nielsen N H, Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol 1992 : 72 : 456 460.
151. Schafer T, Bohler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Filipiak B, Wichmann H E, Ring J. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 2001 : 56 : 1192 1196.
152. Mortz C G, Lauritsen J M, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen K E. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on atopic diseases and dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002 : 82 : 352 358.
153. Bryld L E, Hindsberger C, Kyvik K O, Agner T, Menné T. Risk factors influencing the development of hand eczema in a population-based twin sample. Br J Dermatol 2003 : 149 : 1214 1220.
154. Greig J E, Carson C F, Stuckey M S, Riley T V. Prevalence of delayed hypersensitivity to the European standard Series in a self-selected population. Australas J Dermatol 2000 : 41 : 86 89.
155. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 2002 : 47 : 32 39.
156. Thyssen J P, Uter W, Schnuch A, Linneberg A, Johansen J D. 10-year prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Denmark estimated through the CE-DUR method. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 57 : 265 272.
157. Spiewak R. Atopy and contact hypersensitivity: a reassessment of the relationship using objective measures. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005 : 95 : 61 65.
158. Svedman C, Ekqvist S, Moller H, Bjork J, Gruvberger B, Holmstrom E, Bruze M. Unexpected sensitization routes and general frequency of contact allergies in an elderly stented Swedish population. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 338 343.
159. White J M, Gilmour N J, Jeffries D, Duangdeeden I, Kullavanijaya P, Basketter D A, McFadden J P. A general population from Thailand: incidence of common allergens with emphasis on para-phenylenediamine. Clin Exp Allergy 2007 : 37 : 1848 1853.
160. Lerbaek A, Kyvik K O, Menné T, Agner T. Retesting with the TRUE test in a population-based twin cohort with hand eczema - allergies and persistence in an 8-year follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 57 : 248 252.
161. Dotterud L K, Smith-Sivertsen T. Allergic contact sensitization in the general adult population: a population-based study from Northern Norway. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 10 15.