Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - Reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 216-225

  Frosch, Peter J ^a   Rastogi, Suresh C ^b   Pirker, Claudia ^a   Brinkmeier, Thomas ^a   Andersen, Klaus E ^c   Bruze, Magnus ^d   Svedman, Cecilia ^d   Goossens, An ^e   White, Ian R ^f   Uter, Wolfgang ^g   Arnau, Elena Giménez ^h   Lepoittevin, Jean Pierre ^h   Johansen, Jeanne Duus ⁱ   Menne, Torkil ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^c ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^f ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

hexyl cinnamic aldehyde; Citral; Farnesol; Hydroxyisohexyl 3 cyclohexene carboxaldehyde; Individual constituents; Lyral ; New fragrance mix; Product analysis; Repeated open application test (ROAT)

Indexed keywords

ALPHA HEXYLCINNAMALDEHYDE; CITRAL; CITRONELLOL; COSMETIC; COUMARIN; FARSENOL; FRAGRANCE; HYDROXYISOHEXYL 3 CYCLOHEXENECARBOXALDEHYDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EUROPE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PATCH TEST; PREDICTION; REPEATED OPEN APPLICATION TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN EXAMINATION; TOXICITY TESTING;

ACROLEIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; COSMETICS; COUMARINS; CYCLOHEXENES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FARNESOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION; MIDDLE AGED; MONOTERPENES; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 21044435623     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00563.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Frosch P J, Pirker C, Rastogi S C et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52: 207-215.
2. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
3. Johansen J D, Bruze M, Andersen K E et al. The repeated open application test. Suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 39: 95-96.
4. Rastogi S C. Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J High Resolut Chromatogr 1995: 18: 653-658.
5. Rastogi S C. Survey of chemical compounds in consumer products. Contents of selected fragrance materials in cleaning products and other consumer products. Survey no. 8-2002. Copenhagen, Denmark, Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
6. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T et al. Lyral® is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999: 141: 1076-1083.
7. Johansen J D, Frosch P J, Svedman C, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Pirker C, Menne T. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde- known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis, 2003: 48: 310-316.
8. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Pirker C, Frosch P J. Lyral is included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 295-297.
9. Geier J, Gefeller O. Sensitivity of patch tests with rubber mixes. Results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology from 1990 to 1993. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1995: 6: 143-149.
10. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Burrows D, Camarasa J G, Lachapelle J-M, Lahti A, Menné T, Wilkinson J D. Testing with fragrance mix - is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 266-272.
11. Wöhrl S, Hernmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 268-273.
12. Brites M M, Goncalo M, Figueiredo A. Contact allergy to fragrance mix - a 10-year study. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 181-182.
13. Johansen J D, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 18-23.
14. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch P J. Another look at allergies to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization to the fragrance mix and its constituents. Results from the IVDK. Exogenous Dermatol 2002: 1: 231-237.
15. McLelland J, Shuster S. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests. The additive effects of allergens in combination. Br J Dermatol 1990: 122: 623-630.
16. Johansen J D, Skov L, Volund A, Andersen K E. Menné T. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response. A study of fragrance-sensitive individuals. Br J Dermatol 1998: 139: 264-270.
17. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation Part (I). Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 7: 77-83.
18. de Groot A C, van der Kley A M F, Bruynzeel D B, Meinardi M M, Smeenk G, van Joost T, Pavel S. Frequency of false negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 139-140.
19. Andersen K E, Johansen J D, Bruze M et al. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001: 170: 166-171.
20. Svedman C, Bruze M, Johansen J D et al. Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 217-223.
21. Mutterer V, Gimenez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin J P et al. Identification of coumarin as the sensitizer in a patient sensitive to her own perfume but negative to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 196-199.
22. Hausen B M, Kallweit M. The sensitizing capacity of coumarins (II). Contact Dermatitis 1986: 15: 289-294.
23. Heydorn S, Johansen J D, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Svedman C, White I R, Basketter D A, Menne T. Fragrance allergy in patients with hand eczema - a clinical study. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 317-323.
24. Heydorn S, Menné T, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Svedman C, White I R, Basketter D A. Citral a fragrance allergen and irritant. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 32-36.
25. Wilkinson J D, Andersen K, Camarasa J et al. Preliminary results on the effectiveness of two forms of fragrance mix as screening agents for fragrance sensitivity. In: Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis Frosch P J, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J M et al. (eds): Heidelberg, Springer, 1989: 127-131.
26. Goossens A, Merckx L. Allergic contact dermatitis from farnesol in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 179-180.
27. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch P J. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2001 consecutively tested patients. Results IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 50: 117-121.
28. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union. 2003; L 66/26-35.
29. Menné T, Johansen J D, Frosch P J. Allergic contact dermatitis in man - experimental and quantitative aspects. In: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edition, Rycroft R J B, Menné T, Frosch P J (eds): Heidelberg, Springer-Verl, 2001: 237-248.
30. 26.International Fragrance Association. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. IFRA Standards 2003.
31. Opinion of the Scientific Committe on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for consumers. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral). Adopted 9 December 2003.
32. Johansen J D, Frosch P J, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Testing with fine fragrances in eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 304-307.
33. Trattner A, David M. Patch testing with fine fragrances. Comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 287-289.
34. Hausen B. Lexikon der Kontaktallergene. Landsberg (Germany), ecomed, 1992: P 9, 1-13.
35. Katsarma G, Gawkrodger D J. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 193-197.
36. Menné T, Wahlberg J. Risk assessment failures of chemicals commonly used in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 189-190.