Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: A dose-response elicitation study

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 180-184

  Johansen, Jeanne Duus ^a   Andersen, Klaus Ejner ^b   Svedman, Cecilia ^c   Bruze, Magnus ^c   Bernard, Guillaume ^d   Gimenez Arnau, Elena ^d   Rastogi, Suresh Chandra ^e   Lepoittevin, Jean Pierre ^d   Menné, Torkil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^e NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Contact allergy; Cosmetics; Fragrances; Oak moss absolute; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ALLERGEN; CHLOROATRANOL; FRAGRANCE; PERFUME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMAN; MALE; MOSS; PATCH TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SENSITIZATION; SIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; BENZALDEHYDES; BRYOPHYTA; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PLANT PREPARATIONS; QUERCUS;

EID: 1242314838     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0214.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Rastogi S C et al. Contact allergy to oak moss: search for sensitizing molecules using combined bioassay-guided chemical fractionation, GC-MS and structure-activity relationship analysis (part 1). Arch Dermatol Res 2003: 295: 229-235.
2. Ford R A, Api A M. An investigation of the potential for allergic contact sensitization of several oak moss preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 249.
3. Buckley D A, Wakelin S H, Seed P T et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch test population over 17 years. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142: 279-283.
4. Ehret C, Maupetit P, Petrzilka M, Klecak G. Preparation of oak moss with reduced allergenic potential. Int J Cosmetic Sci 1992: 14: 121-130.
5. Wilkinsson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50: 287-292.
6. Vølund A. Potency evaluation of contact allergens. Statistical appendix. Nordiske Seminar Og Arbejdsrapporter 1993: 570: 83-107.
7. Andersen K E, Johansen J D, Bruze M et al. The time-dose relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001: 170: 166-171.
8. Johansen J D, Bruze M, Andersen K E, Frosch P J, Dreier B, White I R. The repeated open application test: suggestion for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 39: 95-96.
9. Johansen J D, Frosch P J, Svedman C, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Pirker C, Menné T. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde - known as Lyral. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 310-316.
10. Robinson M K, Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, McNamee P, White I R, Basketter D A. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 251-259.
11. Johansen J D, Andersen K E, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Threshold responses in cinnamic aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 165-171.
12. Björkner B, Bruze M, Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Persson K. Contact allergy to the preservative Kathon CG. Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 85-90.
13. Menné T, Frosch P J, Veien N K et al. Contact sensitization to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/CI). Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 334-341.
14. Fewings J, Menné T. An update of the risk assessment for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) with focus on rinse-off products. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 1-13.
15. Bossi R, Rastogi S C, Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Johansen J D, Lepoittevin J P, Ménné T. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of oak moss allergens atranol and chloroatranol in perfumes and deodorants. J Sep Science 2003 (submitted).
16. Actander S. Oak moss. Perfume and flavor materials of natural origin. Elisabeth NJ 1960: 446-456.
17. International Fragrance Association. Code of practice Oak moss extracts. IFRA. Geneva, 1988 (amended April 2000).
18. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K, Felter S P, White I R, Basketter D A. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 333-340.
19. Johansen J D. Contact allergy to fragrances: clinical and experimental investigations of the fragrance mix and its ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 1-31.
20. Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products (SCCNFP). Notes of guidance for testing of cosmetic ingredients for their safety evaluation. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the plenary session of 23 June 1999.