A general population from Thailand: Incidence of common allergens with emphasis on para-phenylenediamine

Clinical and Experimental Allergy

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1848-1853

  White, J M L ^a   Gilmour, N J ^b   Jeffries, D ^b   Duangdeeden, I ^c   Kullavanijaya, P ^c   Basketter, D A ^b   McFadden, J P ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c Institute of Dermatology Thailand   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Chromate; Colophonium; Formaldehyde; Fragrance; Hair dye allergy; Nickel; Normal volunteers; Para phenylenediamine

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; HAIR DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TEST; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; THAILAND; VOLUNTEER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALLERGENS; HAIR DYES; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; THAILAND;

EID: 36349036534     PISSN: 09547894     EISSN: 13652222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02846.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Spoor HJ. Hair colouring - a resume. Cutis 1977 20 : 311 3.
2. Basketter DA, Goodwin BFJ. Investigation of the prohapten concept. Contact Dermatitis 1988 19 : 248 53.
3. Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Lea LJ, Basketter DA, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay responses to para-phenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations. J Appl Toxicol 1999 19 : 255 60.
4. Kligman AM. The identification of contact allergens by human assay 3. The maximisation test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitisers. J Inv Dermatol 1966 47 : 393 409.
5. Fregert S. Chemischer Nachweis von Paraphenylendiamin in Haarfarbemitteln. Hautarzt 1972 23 : 393 5.
6. Holness DL, Nethercott JR, Adams RM et al. Concomitant positive patch test results with standard screening tray in North America. Contact Dermatitis 1995 32 : 289 92.
7. Castiglioni G, Carosso A, Manzoni S, Nebiolo F, Bugiani M. Results of routine patch testing of 834 patients in Turin. Contact Dermatitis 1992 27 : 182 5.
8. Armstrong DKB, Jones AB, Smith HR et al. Occupational sensitisation to p-phenylenediamine a 17 year review. Contact Dermatitis 1999 41 : 348 9.
9. Uter W, Ludwig A, Balda B-R et al. The prevalence of contact allergy differed between population-based and clinic-based data. J. Clin. Epidemiol 2004 57 : 627 32.
10. Sosted H, Hesse U, Menné T, Andersen KE, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview-based study. Br J Dermatol 2005 153 : 132 5.
11. Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Danese P, Motolese A. Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1990 23 : 162 7.
12. Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 2001 56 : 1192 6.
13. Fregert S. Manual for Contact Dermatitis. Copenhagen : Munksgaard, 1981.
14. SAS. SAS, Version 9. Cary, NC : SAS, 2003
15. CIA woorld factbook :
16. Natsuaki M. Results of patch testing with standard allergens of The Japanese Society for Contact Dermatitis and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory preparations. Environ Dermatol 2000 7 : 1 5.
17. Sharma VK, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitisers in Chandigargh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1998 38 : 127 31.
18. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 2003 149 : 986 9.
19. Hextall JM, Algaratnam NJ, Glendinning AK et al. Dose-time relationships for elicitation of contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2002 47 : 96 9.
20. McFadden JP, Wakelin SH, Holloway DB, Basketter DA. The effect of patch test duration on the elicitation of para-phenylenediamine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1998 39 : 79 81.
21. Ho SGY, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol 2005 153 : 364 7.
22. White JML, Basketter DA, Pease CK, Sanders DA, McFadden JP. Intermittent exposure to low concentration para-phenylenediamine can be equivalent to single, higher dose exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 262 5.
23. Nielsen NH, Menné T. Nickel sensitisation and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population. Glostrup Allergy Study. Contact Dermatitis 1993 29 : 16 21.
24. Goh CL, Gan SL. Change in cement manufacturing process, a cause for decline in chromate allergy? Contact Dermatitis 1996 34 : 51 4.
25. Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17 year period. Br J Dermatol 2000 142 : 284 7.
26. Dawe SA, White IR, Rycroft RJ, Basketter DA, McFadden JP. Active sensitization to para-phenylenediamine and its relevance: a 10 year review. Contact Dermatitis 2004 51 : 96 7.
27. Nielsen NH, Kristiansen J, Borg L, Christensen JM, Poulsen LK, Menné T. Repeated exposures to cobalt or chromate on the hands of patients with hand eczema and contact allergy to that metal. Contact Dermatitis 2000 43 : 212 5.
28. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE et al. Deodorants; an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol. Contact Dermatitis 2005 52 : 260 7.