Reacting to applicant perspectives research: What's next?

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 431-437

  Morgeson, Frederick P ^a   Ryan, Ann Marie ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73149100995     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00484.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anseel, F. Lievens, F. (2009) The Mediating Role of Feedback Acceptance in the Relationship between Feedback and Attitudinal and Performance Outcomes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 362 376.
2. Brooks, M.E., Guidroz, A.M. Chakrabarti, M. (2009) Distinction Bias in Applicant Reactions to Using Diversity Information in Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 377 390.
3. Chan, D. Schmitt, N. (2004) An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9 23.
4. Dierdorff, E.C. Morgeson, F.P. (2007) Consensus in Work Role Requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1228 1241.
5. Dierdorff, E.C., Rubin, R.S. Morgeson, F.P. (2009) The Milieu of Managerial Work: An integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 972 988.
6. Ford, D.K., Truxillo, D.M. Bauer, T.N. (2009) Rejected but Still There: Shifting the focus in applicant reactions to the promotional context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 402 416.
7. Harrison, D.A., Kravitz, D.A., Mayer, D.M., Leslie, L.M. Lev-Arey, D. (2006) Understanding Attitudes toward Affirmative Action Programs in Employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1013 1036.
8. Imus, A. Ryan, A.M. (2005) Relevance and Rigor in Research on the Applicant's Perspective: In pursuit of pragmatic science. In : Anderson, N., Voskuijl, O. Evers, A. (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection. London : Blackwell Publishers, pp. 291 305.
9. Johns, G. (2006) The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386 408.
10. Kanfer, R. Ackerman, P.L. (1989) Motivation and Cognitive Abilities: An integrative/aptitude treatment-interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657 690.
11. König, C.J., Melchers, K.G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G.M. Klehe, U. (2006) The Relationship between the Ability to Identify Evaluation Criteria and Integrity Test Scores. Psychology Science, 48, 369 377.
12. König, C.J., Melchers, K.G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G.M. Klehe, U. (2007) Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 283 292.
13. Levashina, J., Morgeson, F.P. Campion, M.A. (in press) They Don't Do It Often, But They Do It Well: Exploring the relationship between applicant mental abilities and faking. International Journal of Selection and Assessment.
14. Lievens, F. Peeters, H. (2008) Interviewers' Sensitivity to Impression Management Tactics in Structured Interviews. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 174 180.
15. Marcus, B. (2009) 'Faking' for the Applicant's Perspective: A theory of self-presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 417 430.
16. Maynard, D. Ryan, A.M. (1995). Reactions to compensatory versus non-compensatory selection systems. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
17. McCarthy, J.M., Hrabluik, C. Jelley, B. (in press) Progression Through the Ranks: Assessing employee reactions to high-stakes employment testing. Personnel Psychology.
18. Myors, B., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Cronshaw, S.F., Mladinic, A., et al 2008) International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 206 246.
19. Peeters, H. Lievens, F. (2006) Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 206 222.
20. Ployhart, R.E., Ehrhart, K.H. Hayes, S.C. (2005) Using Attributions to Understand the Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: Are reactions consistent with the covariation principle? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 259 296.
21. Ployhart, R.E., Ryan, A.M. Bennett, M. (1999) Explanations for Selection Decisions: Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 87 106.
22. Ryan, A.M., Boyce, A.S., Ghumman, S., Jundt, D., Schmidt, G. Gibby, R. (in press) Going Global: Cultural values and perceptions of selection procedures. Applied Psychology: An International Review.
23. Ryan, A.M. Huth, M. (2008) Not Much More than Platitudes? A Critical Look at the Utility of Applicant Reactions Research. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 119 132.
24. Ryan, A.M. Ployhart, R.E. (2000) Applicants' Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565 606.
25. Sackett, P. Lievens, F. (2008) Personnel Selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419 450.
26. Schinkel, S., van Dierendonck, D. Anderson, N. (2004) The Impact of Selection Encounters on Applicants: An experimental study into feedback effects after a negative selection decision. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 197 205.
27. Schlenker, B.R. (1980) Impression Management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA : Brooks/Cole.
28. Schneider, B. (1987) The People Make the Place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437 453.
29. Shaw, J.C., Wild, E. Colquitt, J.A. (2003) To Justify or Excuse? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444 458.
30. Sieverding, M. (2009) 'Be Cool!': Emotional costs of hiding feelings in a job interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 391 401.
31. Truxillo, D.M., Bodner, T.E., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T.N. Yonce, C.A. (2009) Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 346 361.
32. Van Iddekinge, C.H., McFarland, L.A. Raymark, P.H. (2007) Antecedents of Impression Management Use and Effectiveness in a Structured Interview. Journal of Management, 33, 752 773.