Fracture strength of flared bovine roots restored with different intraradicular posts

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 574-578

  Clavijo, Victor Grover Rene ^a   Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes ^a   Kabbach, William ^a   e Silva, André Luis Faria ^b   de Oliveira Junior, Osmir Batista ^a   de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Post and core technique; Prosthodontics

Indexed keywords

EID: 72549088563     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000600007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated restored with different posts system. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431-7.
2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999;27:275-8.
3. Bonfante G, Kaizer OB, Pegoraro LF, Valle AL. Fracture strength of teeth with flared root canals restored with glass fibre posts. Int Dent J. 2007;57:153-60.
4. Bortoluzzi EA, Souza EM, Reis JMSN, Esberard RM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Fracture strength of bovine incisors after intra-radicular treatment with MTA in an experimental immature tooth model. Int Endod J. 2007;40:684-91.
5. Boudrias P, Sakkal S, Petrova Y. Anatomical post design meets quartz fiber technology: rationale and case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001;22:337-40.
6. Braga RR, Boaro LC, Kuroe T, Azevedo CL, Singer JM. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and 'C' factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2006;22:818-23.
7. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod. 1998;24:807-10.
8. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: le composipost. Chir Dent France. 1990;60:131-41.
9. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2007;20:287-91.
10. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-resin forced epoxy-resin posts and cast post-and-core. Am J Dent. 2000;13:15B-8B.
11. Fraga RC, Chaves BT, Mello GS, Siqueira JF Jr. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:809-13.
12. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:151-7.
13. Freedman G. The carbon fiber post: metal-free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health. 1996;86:23-30.
14. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:235-40.
15. Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:243-7.
16. Heidecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different posts and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001;29:427-33.
17. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:131-6.
18. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:882-7.
19. Lassila LP, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29-36.
20. Lui JL. Cermet reinforcement of a weakened endodontically treated root: a case report. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:533-8.
21. Melo MP, Valle AL, Pereira JR, Bonachela WC, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composites with varying quantities of remaining coronal tooth structure. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13:141-6.
22. Mendonza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin bonded performed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:10-5.
23. Mitsui FH, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA, Ferraresi PM. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:612-6.
24. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:419-22.
25. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radeke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intra-radicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:483-91.
26. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:262-9.
27. Soares CJ Pizi ECG, Fonseca RB, Martins LRM. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res. 2005;19:11-6.
28. Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ. Ferrule design and Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:529-35.
29. Terry DA. Restoring the intraradicular space with direct composite resins: fiber-reinforced post-and-core system. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16:445-7.
30. Yoldas O, Akova T, Uysal H. An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post-core applications. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:427-32.