Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts

Dental Materials

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-36

  Lassila, Lippo V J ^a   Tanner, Johanna ^a   Le Bell, Anna Maria ^a   Narva, Katja ^a   Vallittu, Pekka K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Dental materials; Fiber reinforced composites; Flexural properties; Root canal posts

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; BENDING STRENGTH; CARBON FIBERS; CERAMIC MATERIALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CRYSTALLIZATION; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; FRACTURE; GLASS FIBERS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); POLYMERIZATION; RIGIDITY; SILICA; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; THERMAL CYCLING; THERMAL EXPANSION;

FLEXURAL PROPERTIES; ROOT CANAL POSTS;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

CARBON; CARBON FIBER; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; HEAT; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARBON; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; GLASS; HEAT; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0347947231     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Assif D., Bitenski A., Pilo R., Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 69:1993;36-40.
2. King P., Setchell D. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 17:1990;599-609.
3. Ichikawa Y., Akagawa Y., Nikai H., Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;322-326.
4. Torbjörner A., Karlsson S., Syverud M., Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 104:1996;605-611.
5. Duret B., Duret F., Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the composipost. Compend-Contin-Educ-Dent-Suppl. 20:1996;50-56.
6. Isidor F., Ödman P., Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthod. 9:1996;131-136.
7. Fredriksson M., Astbäck J., Pamenius M., Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 80:1998;151-157.
8. Torbjörner A., Karlsson S., Ödman P. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 73:1995;439-444.
9. Duret B., Duret F. A new concept of corono-radicular reconstruction, the Composipost. Chir Dent Fr. 60:1990;131-141.
10. Purton D., Payne J. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int. 27:1996;93-97.
11. Murphy J. Reinforced plastics handbook. 1998;Elsevier, Oxford. p. 63-106.
12. Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 27:1998;275-278.
13. Sorensen J., Engelman M. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 64:1990;419-424.
14. Goldberg A., Burstone C., Hadjinikolaou I., Jancar J. Screening of matrices and fibers for reinforced thermoplastics intended for dental applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 28:1994;167-173.
15. Plastics (I). Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials, Annual book of ASTM standards. 1999;American Society for Testing and Materials.
16. Cooper G. Optimization of the three-point bend test for fracture energy measurement. J Mater Sci. 12:1977;277-289.
17. Plastics (III). Standard test method for flexural properties of fiber reinforced pultured plastic rods, Annual book of ASTM standards, Section 8, Plastics. 1999;American society for testing and materials, vol. 8.03.
18. Parry T.V., Wronski A. Kinking and tensile, compressive and interlaminar shear failure in carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic beams tested in flexure. J Mater Sci. 2:1981;439-450.
19. Vallittu P. Effect of 180-week water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. Int J Prosthod. 13:2000;334-339.
20. Lassila L.V.J., Nohrström T., Vallittu P. The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. Biomaterials. 23:2002;2221-2229.
21. Grant T., Bradley W. In-situ observations in SEM of degradation of graphite/epoxy composite materials due to seawater immersion. J Compos Mater. 29:1995;852-867.
22. Latour R., Black J. Development of FRP composite structural biomaterials: ultimate strength of the fiber/matrix interfacial bond in in vivo simulated environments. J Biomed Mater Res. 26:1992;593-606.
23. Söderholm K., Mukherjee R., Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 75:1996;1692-1699.
24. Meyer M., Friedman R., Del Schutte H., Latour R. Long-term durability of the interface in FRP composites after exposure to simulated physiologic saline environments. J Biomed Mater Res. 28:1994;1221-1231.
25. Vallittu PK. The Second International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Plastics in Dentistry. Turku: University of Turku; 2002. p. 2-28.
26. Fernandes A., Dessai G. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthod. 14:2001;355-363.
27. Sorensen J., Martinoff J. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent. 52:1984;28-35.
28. Sidoli G., King P., Setchell D. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 78:1997;5-9.