Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: An in-vitro study

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 427-433

  Heydecke, Guido ^a,b   Butz, Frank ^b   Strub, Jörg R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial mouth; Crowns; Dental pulp devitalization adverse effects; Fracture strength; Incisor; Post and core technique; Prosthodontics; Root canal therapy adverse effects; Survival rate

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0035432508     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00038-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Textbook of clinical cariology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1994:159-91.
2. Sundberg H. Changes in the prevalence of caries in children and adolescents in Sweden 1985-1994. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1996;104:470-6.
3. Backer Dirks O. Longitudinal dental caries study in children 9-15 years of age. Archives of Oral Biology 1961;6(Special Supplement):94-108.
4. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence 1997:181-209.
5. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs. endodontically treated teeth. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1994;10:91-3.
6. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. Journal of Endodontics 1989;15:512-6.
7. Rivera EM, Yamauchi M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth. Archives of Oral Biology 1993;38:541-6.
8. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-cores. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1977;38:507-14.
9. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1979;42:39-44.
10. McDonald AV, King PA, Setchell DJ. In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. International Endodontic Journal 1990;23:304-12.
11. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1985;1:108-11.
12. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, et al. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1993;69:36-40.
13. Robbins JW, Earnest LA, Schumann SD. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated cuspids. American Journal of Dentistry 1993;6:159-61.
14. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997;78:5-9.
15. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;51:780-4.
16. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1985;53:631-6.
17. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, et al. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000;27:595-601.
18. Kern M, Simon MHP, Strub JR. Preliminary clinical experience with zirconia posts. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1998;53:266-8.
19. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. Journal of Dental Research 1989;68:1540-4.
20. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1995;8:155-61.
21. Jordan RE, Abrams L, Kraus BS. Kraus' dental anatomy and occlusion. St Louis: Mosby, 1992.
22. Woelfel JB, Scheid RC. Dental anatomy: its relevant to dentistry. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
23. Koutayas SO, Kern M, Ferraresso F, et al. Influence of design and mode of loading on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study in a dual-axis chewing simulator. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000;83:540-7.
24. Kern M, Strub JR, Lü XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1999;26:372-8.
25. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. Journal of Dental Research 1983;62:32-6.
26. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, et al. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dental Materials 1986;2:235-40.
27. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function - a review of the literature. 2. Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1975;2:281-301.
28. Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H, et al. Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1987;45:101-7.
29. De Boever JA, McCall Jr WD, Holden S, et al. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1978;40:326-33.
30. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1995;8:247-51.
31. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1990;64:419-24.
32. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture - a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. Journal of Endodontics 1978;4:341-5.
33. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. Journal of Endodontics 1992;18:440-3.
34. Butz F, Lennon A, Heydecke G, et al. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post and core systems. An in-vitro study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2001;14:58-64.
35. Baratieri LN, De Andrada MA, Arcari GM, et al. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000;84:180-4.
36. Reagan SE, Fruits TJ, Van Brunt CL, et al. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence International 1999;30:61-7.
37. Patel A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation of cast post and partial core design. Journal of Dentistry 1996;24:281-7.
38. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1990;63:529-36.
39. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and- coresystems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999;81:262-9.
40. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. The effect of various post-/core buildup designs on the fracture resistance of crown-restored incisors. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1999;54:637-40.
41. Attin T, Hellwig E, Hilgers RD. The influence of reinforcement posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1994;49:586-9.
42. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, et al. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1990;100:953-60.
43. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999;81:652-61.
44. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:42-8.