In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 612-616

  Mitsui, Fabio Hiroyuki Ogata ^a   Marchi, Giselle Maria ^a   Pimenta, Luiz André Freire ^a   Ferraresi, Priscila Miucci ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cast post and core; Fracture resistance; Intraradicular post system; Prefabricated post

Indexed keywords

CARBON FIBER; GLASS FIBER; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTURE; HISTOLOGY; IN VITRO STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CARBON; CATTLE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 4143115690     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
2. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996;27:93-97.
3. Purton DG, Chandler NP, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of root canal posts. Br Dent J 1998;184:294-296.
4. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-567.
5. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
6. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of post cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993;38:39-45.
7. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111.
8. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:350-357.
9. Federick DR. An application of the dowel and composite resin core technique. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:420-425.
10. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:140-147.
11. Shillingburg J, Herbert T, Kessler JC. Restoration of crowned teeth after endodontic treatment. Quintessence Int 1982;6:634-641.
12. Christensen GJ. Posts and cores: State of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:96-97.
13. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture: A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345.
14. Cailleteau JG, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Endod 1992;18:540-544.
15. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998;24:807-810.
16. Marchi GM. Effect of different filling materials in combination with intraradicular posts on the resistance to fracture of weakened roots [thesis]. Piracicaba, Brazil: Dentistry School of Piracicaba-UNICAMP, 1997.
17. Marchi GM, Paulillo LAMS, Pimenta LAP, De Lima FAP. Effect of different filling materials in combination with intraradicular posts on the resistance to fracture of weakened roots. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:623-629.
18. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
19. De Sort KD. The prosthodontic use of endodontically treated teeth: Theory and biomechanics of post preparation. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:203-206.
20. Fraga RC, Chaves BT, Mello GSB, Siqueira JF Jr. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:809-813.
21. Caputo AA, Hokama SN. Stress and retention properties of a new threaded endodontic post. Quintessence Int 1987;18:431-435.
22. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics, ed 3. Chicago: Year Book Medical, 1973:409.
23. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992;18:440-443.
24. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:11-16.
25. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
26. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996;29:262-265.
27. Ahmad I. Zirconium oxide post and core system for the restoration of an endodontically treated incisor. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:197-204.
28. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all ceramic indirect post-and-core system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:625-629.
29. Meyenberg KH, Luthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: A new concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:73-80.
30. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Direct core buildup using a preformed crown and prefabricated zirconium oxide post. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:730-732.
31. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth: Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 1984;28:923-951.