Fracture strength of teeth with flared root canals restored with glass fibre posts

International Dental Journal

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 153-160

  Bonfante, Gerson ^a   Kaizer, Osvaldo Bazzan ^a,b   Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando ^a   Lins Do Valle, Accácio ^a  

^a NONE

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Dental dowels; Materials failure analysis; Materials testing; Post and core technique

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347269220     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2007.tb00118.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett L D et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1998.
2. Kimmel SS. Restoration of endodontically treated tooth containg wide or flared canal. N Y St Dent J 2000 66: 36-40.
3. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumat 1985 1: 108-111.
4. Mitsui FHO, Marchi GM, Pimenta LAF et al. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int 2004 35: 612-616.
5. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F et al. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Amer J Dent 2000 12: 9B-13B.
6. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Comp Continuing Educ Dent 1996 17: 565-573.
7. Freedman G. The carbon fiber post: metal-free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health 1996 86: 23-30.
8. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP et al. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 2000.
9. Duret PB, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstrution corono-radiculaire: le composiposte (I). Chir Dent Fr 1990 60: 131-141.
10. Rovatti L, Mason PN, Dallari A. New researches on fibre carbon posts. Minerva Stomatologica 1994 43: 17-20.
11. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992 8: 197-202.
12. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001 10: 26-36.
13. Stewardson DA. Non-metal post systems. Dent Update 2001 28: 326-336.
14. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M et al. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber- reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998 80: 151-157.
15. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C et al. Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16: 593-596.
16. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 431-437.
17. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999 1: 153-158.
18. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fiber reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years - an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005 33: 305-312.
19. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003 89: 360-367.
20. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R et al. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993 69: 36-40.
21. Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using light-transmitting plastic posts. Quintessence Int 1994 25: 313-319.
22. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 483-491.
23. Braz R, Conceição AAB, Conceição EN et al. Evaluation of reinforcement materials used on filling of weakened roots. J Dent Res 2005 84: abstract 1733.
24. Grandini S. O pino anatômico. In Scotti R, Ferrari M (eds) Pinos de fibra. pp 93-98. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2003.
25. Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent 2003 5: 243-247.
26. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thickness of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985 53: 496-500.
27. Hu YH, Pang LC, Hsu CC et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 2003 34: 349-353.
28. Milot P, Stein S. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 1992 68: 428-435.
29. Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson L. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001 14: 141-145.
30. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990 63: 529-536.
31. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 262-269.
32. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A et al. Fracture strenght after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 438-445.
33. Ottl P, Hahn L, Lauer H et al. Fracture characteristics of carbon fiber, ceramic an non-palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehab 2002 29: 175-183.
34. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehab 2001 28: 120-124.
35. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK et al. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004 17: 476-482.
36. Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct post and cores: a sistematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 380-386.
37. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997 78: 5-9.
38. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertani P et al. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mat 2002 18: 596-602.
39. Berger CR, Cavina DA. Pinos intra-radiculares não-metálicos. In Gomes JC (ed) Estética em clínica odontológica. pp 395-426. Curitiba: Maio, 2004.
40. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL et al. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mat 2002 18: 459-502.
41. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F et al. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent Mat 2005 21: 437-444.
42. Yoldas O, Tayfun A. Microhardness of composites in simulated root canals cured with light transmitting posts and glass-fiber reinforced composite posts. J Endod 2005 31: 104-106.
43. Mannocci F, Vichi A, Ferrari M et al. Carbon fiber posts: clinical and laboratory studies. In Proceedings from the International Symposium S. Margherita Ligure, pp 17-21. S. Margherita Ligure: Hypocrates Edizioni 1998.