Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2009, Pages

  Craddock, Matt ^a   Lawson, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; TACTILE MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 71049160045     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Lawson R (1999) Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica 102: 221-245. doi: 10.1016/ S0001-6918(98)00052-3.
2. Craddock M, Lawson R (2008) Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects. Perception & Psychophysics 70(7): 1350-1365. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1350.
3. Lacey S, Peters A, Sathian K (2007) Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent. PLoS ONE 2(9): e890. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0000890.
4. Lawson R (2009) A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic 3D object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 35(4): 911-930. doi: 10.1037/a0015025.
5. Newell FN, Ernst MO, Tjan BS, Bülthoff HH (2001) Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12(1): 37-42. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00307.
6. Craddock M, Lawson R (2009) The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 71: 910-923. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.910.
7. Lacey S, Tal N, Amedi A, Sathian K (2009) A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topography 21: 269-274. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0087-4.
8. Amedi A, Jacobson G, Hendler T, Malach R, Zohary E (2002) Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex 12: 1202-1212. doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202.
9. Amedi A, von Kriegstein K, van Atteveldt NM, Beauchamp MS, Naumer MJ (2005) Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 166: 559-571. doi: 10.1007/ s00221-005-2396-5.
10. Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E (2001) Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 4(3): 324-330. doi: 10.1038/85201.
11. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, et al. (2002) Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40(10): 1706-1714. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00017-9.
12. James TW, Kim S, Fisher JS (2007) The neural basis of haptic object processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(3): 219-229. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007023.
13. Miquée A, Xerri C, Rainville C, Anton J, Nazarian B, et al. (2008) Neuronal substrates of haptic shape encoding and matching: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 152(1): 29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.021.
14. Zhang M, Weisser VD, Stilla R, Prather SC, Sathian K (2004) Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4(2): 251-259.
15. Stilla R, Sathian K (2008) Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture. Human Brain Mapping 29: 1123-1138. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20456.
16. Amedi A, Stern WM, Camprodon JA, Bermpohl F, Merabet L, et al. (2007) Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nature Neuroscience 10(6): 687-689. doi: 10.1038/nn1912.
17. Reales JM, Ballesteros S (1999) Implicit and explicit for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 25(3): 644-663.
18. Bushnell EW, Baxt C (1999) Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25(6): 1867-1881.
19. Lacey S, Campbell C (2006) Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59(2): 361-376. doi: 10.1080/ 17470210500173232.
20. Easton RD, Greene AJ, Srinivas K (1997) Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4(3): 403-410.
21. Norman JF, Norman HF, Clayton AM, Lianekhammy J, Zielke G (2004) The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics 66(2): 342-351.
22. Cooke T, Jäkel F, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2007) Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia 45(3): 484-495. doi: 10.1016/ j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009.
23. Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94(2): 115-147.
24. Hummel JE, Stankiewicz BJ (1996) An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description. In: Inui T, McClelland JL, eds. Attention and performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication (pp. 93-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2: 1019-1025.
26. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (2002) Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12: 162-168.
27. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19(6): 1162-1182. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1162.
28. Hayward WG (2003) After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10): 425-427. doi: 10.1016/ j.tics.2003.08.004.
29. Tarr MJ, Bülthoff HH (1995) Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21(6): 1494-1505. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1494.
30. Tarr MJ, Cheng YD (2003) Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(1): 23-30. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00010-4.
31. Peissig JJ, Tarr MJ (2007) Visual object recognition: Do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? Annual Review of Psychology 58: 75-96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.102904.190114.
32. Lacey S, Pappas M, Kreps A, Lee K, Sathian K (2009) Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations. Experimental Brain Research 198: 329-337. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1856-8.
33. Jolicoeur P (1987) A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Memory & Cognition 15(6): 531-543.
34. Milliken B, Jolicoeur P (1992) Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory & Cognition 20(1): 83-95.
35. Srinivas K (1996) Size and reflection effects in priming: A test of transfer-appropriate processing. Memory & Cognition 24(4): 441-452.
36. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1992) Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18(1): 121-133. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121.
37. Fiser J, Biederman I (1995) Size invariance in visual object priming of gray-scale images. Perception 24(7): 741-748. doi: 10.1068/p240741.
38. Uttl B, Graf P, Siegenthaler AL (2007) Influence of object size on baseline identification, priming, and explicit memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 48: 281-288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00571.x.
39. Reed CL, Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1990) Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 44(4): 522-545.
40. Lederman SJ, Summers C, Klatzky RL (1996) Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception 25(8): 983-998. doi: 10.1068/p250983.
41. Wijntjes MA, van Lienen T, Verstijnen IM, Kappers AML (2008) The influence of picture size on recognition and exploratory behaviour in raised-line drawings. Perception 37(4): 602-614. doi: 10.1068/p5714.
42. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19(3): 342-368. doi: 10.1016/ 0010-0285(87)90008-9.
43. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1990) Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration. Cognitive Psychology 22(4): 421-459. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90009-S.
44. Helbig H, Graf M, Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 174(2): 221-228. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5.
45. Desmarais G, Dixon MJ, Roy EA (2007) A role for action knowledge in visual object identification. Memory & Cognition 35(7): 1712-1723.
46. Borghi AM, Bonfiglioli C, Lugli L, Ricciardelli P, Rubichi S, et al. (2007) Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters 411(1): 17-21. doi: 10.1016/ j.neulet.2006.10.003.
47. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1991) Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20: 167-177.
48. Loftus GR, Masson MEJ (1994) Using confidence-intervals in within-subject designs. Perception & Psychophysics 1(4): 476-490. Milliken, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 83-95.
49. Jarmasz J, Hollands G (2009) Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(2): 124-138. doi: 10.1037/a0014164.