Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 361-376

  Lacey, Simon ^a   Campbell, Christine ^a  

^a SOUTHAMPTON SOLENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33645055119     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500173232     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andrade, J., Kemps, E., Werniers, Y., May, J., & Szmalec, A. (2002). Insensitivity of visual shortterm memory to irrelevant visual information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(3), 753-774.
2. Baddeley, A. D., Grant, S., Wight, E., & Thomson, M. (1975). Imagery and visual working memory. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention & performance (Vol. V). London: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Lieberman, K. (1980). Spatial working memory. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention & performance (Vol. VIII). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Bushnell, E. W. (1986). The basis of infant visualtactual functioning-amodal compounds or multimodal dimensions? In L. P. Lipsitt & C. Rovee-Collier (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 4, pp. 182-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
5. Bushnell, E. W., & Baxt, C. (1999). Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1867-1881.
6. Cairns, E., &Coll, P. (1977). The role of visual imagery in visual, tactual and cross-modal matching. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 213-214.
7. Chartered Institute of Taxation. (1998). Annotated copy of the Finance Act 1998. London: Butterworths.
8. Dean, G. M., Dewhurst, S. A., Morris, P. E., & Whittaker, A. (in press). Selective interference with the use of visual images in the symbolic distance paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
9. Dean, G. M., & Morris, P. E. (2003). The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 245-273.
10. Easton, R. D., Greene, A. J., & Srinivas, K. (1997a). Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(3), 403-410.
11. Easton, R. D., Srinivas, K., & Greene, A. J. (1997b). Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 153-163.
12. Freides, D. (1974). Human information processing and sensory modality: Cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory and deficit. Psychological Bulletin, 81(5), 284-310.
13. Garvill, J., & Molander, B. (1973). Effects of standard modality, comparison modality and retention interval on matching of form. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14, 203-206.
14. Garvill, J., &. Molander, B. (1977). A note on the relation between cross-modal transfer of learning and cross-modal matching. Umea Psychological Reports, No 126. University of Umea, Sweden.
15. Johnson, C. L., Paivio, A. U., & Clark, J. M. (1989). Spatial and verbal abilities in children's cross-modal recognition: A dual-coding approach. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43(3), 397-412.
16. Jones, B. (1981). The developmental significance of cross-modal matching. In R. D. Walk & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory integration (pp. 108-136). New York: Plenum Press.
17. Jones, B., &. Connolly, K. (1970). Memory effects in crossmodal matching. British Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 267-270.
18. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J.,&Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An "expert system". Perception andPsychophysics, 37(4), 299-302.
19. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Reed, C. (1987). There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(4), 356-369.
20. Lederman, S.J., Summers, C., & Klatzky, R. L. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object p roperties: Role of modality encoding bias. Perception, 25, 983-998.
21. Lewkowicz, D. J. (1994). Development of intersensory perception in human infants. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of inter-sensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 165-203). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
22. Marcell, M. M., & Allen, T. W. (1978). Memory effects and sensory integration: An examination of sensory modality translation models of intersensory functioning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 133(2), 171-182.
23. McConnell, J., & Quinn, J. G. (2000). Interference in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(1), 53-67.
24. Millar, S. (1972). Effects of interpolated tasks on latency and accuracy of intermodal and cross-modal shape recognition by children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96(1), 170-175.
25. Newell, F. N., Ernst, M. O., Tjan, B. S., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12(1), 37-42.
26. Newell, K. M., Shapiro, D. C., & Carlton, M. J. (1979). Coordinating visual and kinaesthetic memory codes. British Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 87-96.
27. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt Rhinehart & Winston.
28. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30. Pick, H. L., Jr. (1986). Reflections on the data and theory of cross-modal infancy research. In L. P. Lipsitt & C. Rovee-Collier (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 4, pp. 230-239). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
31. Quinn, J. G., & McConnell, J. (1996a). Indications of the functional distinction between the components of visual working memory. Psychologische Beitrage, 53, 355-367.
32. Quinn, J. G., & McConnell, J. (1996b). Irrelevant pictures in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1}, 200-215.
33. Quinn, J. G., & McConnell J. (1999). Manipulation of interference in the passive visual store. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 373-389.
34. Rose, S. A. (1994). From hand to eye: Findings and issues in infant cross-modal transfer. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 265-284). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
35. Sathian, K., Zangaladze, A., Huffman, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (1997). Feeling with the mind's eye. Neuroreport, 8, 3877-3881.
36. Stoltz-Loike, M., &Bornstein, M. H. (1987). The roles of imagery, language and metamemory in crossmodal transfer in children. Psychological Research, 49, 63-68.
37. Streri, A., & Molina, M. (1994). Constraints on intermodal transfer between touch and vision in infancy. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 285-307). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
38. Wagner, S. H., & Sakovits, L. J. (1986). A process analysis of infant visual and cross-modal recognition memory: Implications for an amodal code. In L. P. Lipsitt & C. Rovee-Collier (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 4, pp. 195-217). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
39. Walker-Andrews, A. S. (1994). Taxonomy for intermodal relations. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 39-56). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
40. Woods, A. T., O'Modhrain, S., & Neweé, F. N. (2004). The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on crossmodal object recognition. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioural Neuroscience, 4(2), 260-269. 296-311