The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 910-923

  Craddock, Matt ^a   Lawson, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650138987     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.4.910     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amedi, A., Jacobson, G., Hendler, T., Malach, R., & Zohary, E. (2002). Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1202-1212. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202
2. Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S., & Zohary, E. (2001). Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 324-330. doi:10.1038/85201
3. Amedi, A., von Kriegstein, K., van Atteveldt, N. M., Beauchamp, M. S., & Naumer, M. J. (2005). Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 559-571. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2396-5
4. Barac-Cikoja, D., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). Does perceived size depend on perceived distance? An argument from extended haptic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 216-224.
5. Bennett, D. J., & Warren, W. (2002). Size scaling: Retinal or environmental frame of reference? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 462-477.
6. Berryman, L. J., Yau, J. M., & Hsiao, S. S. (2006). Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 27-39. doi:10.1152/jn.01190.2005
7. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 121-133. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121
8. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
9. Cooke, T., Jäkel, F., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia, 45, 484-495. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009
10. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 43-57. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.43
11. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2008). Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1350-1365. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1350
12. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (in press). Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects? Perception.
13. Deibert, E., Kraut, M., Kremen, S., & Hart, J., Jr. (1999). Neural pathways in tactile object recognition. Neurology, 52, 1413-1417.
14. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. doi:10.1038/415429a
15. Fiser, J., & Biederman, I. (1995). Size invariance in visual object priming of gray-scale images. Perception, 24, 741-748. doi:10.1068/p240741
16. Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00133-7
17. Goldfarb, L., & Tzelgov, J. (2005). Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 751-754.
18. Haber, R. N., & Levin, C. A. (2001). The independence of size perception and distance perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1140-1152.
19. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron, 35, 793-801. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00803-6
20. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Servos, P., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1706-1714. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00017-9
21. James, T. W., Kim, S., & Fisher, J. S. (2007). The neural basis of haptic object processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 219-229. doi:10.1037/cjep2007023
22. Jolicoeur, P. (1987). A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Memory & Cognition, 15, 531-543.
23. Kiphart, M. J., Hughes, J. L., Simmons, J. P., & Cross, H. A. (1992). Short-term haptic memory for complex objects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 212-214.
24. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Reed, C. (1987). There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 356-369. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.4.356
25. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Lederman, S. J., Wake, H., & Fujita, N. (1993). Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 170-178.
26. Lacey, S., Peters, A., & Sathian, K. (2007). Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent. PLoS ONE, 2, e890. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000890
27. Lawson, R. (2008). Haptic object recognition: Effects of removing depth cues and restricting exploration. Manuscript in preparation.
28. Lawson, R. (in press). A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic 3D object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
29. Lawson, R., & Bertamini, M. (2006). Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors. Perception, 35, 1265-1288. doi:10.1068/p5498
30. Lawson, R., Bertamini, M., & Liu, D. (2007). Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1027-1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1027
31. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342-368. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9
32. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 421-459. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90009-S
33. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2004). Multisensory texture perception. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 107-122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Lederman, S. J., Summers, C., & Klatzky, R. L. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception, 25, 983-998.
35. Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., & Jones, B. (1986). Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 169-180.
36. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
37. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1991). Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception, 20, 167-177.
38. Milliken, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory & Cognition, 20, 83-95.
39. Miquée, A., Xerri, C., Rainville, C., Anton, J. L., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., & Zennou-Azogui, Y. (2008). Neuronal substrates of haptic shape encoding and matching: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience, 152, 29-39. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.021
40. Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429-434. doi:10.1038/nn1641
41. Newell, F. N., Ernst, M. O., Tjan, B. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 37-42. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00307
42. Norman, J. F., Clayton, A. M., Norman, H. F., & Crabtree, C. E. (2008). Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch. Perception, 37, 185-196. doi:10.1068/p5679
43. Reed, C. L., Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 522-545.
44. Rock, I., & Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594-596. doi:10.1126/science.143.3606.594
45. Sathian, K., & Lacey, S. (2007). Journeying beyond classical somatosensory cortex. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 254-264. doi:10.1037/cjep2007026
46. Srinivas, K., Greene, A. J., & Easton, R. D. (1997). Visual and tactile memory for 2-D patterns: Effects of changes in size and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 535-540.
47. Taylor-Clarke, M., Jacobsen, P., & Haggard, P. (2004). Keeping the world a constant size: Object constancy in human touch. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 219-220. doi:10.1038/nn1199
48. Uttl, B., Graf, P., & Siegenthaler, A. L. (2007). Influence of object size on baseline identification, priming, and explicit memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 281-288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00571.x
49. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 491-499. doi:10.1038/nn839
50. Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 253-259. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1599-x
51. Zhang, M., Weisser, V. D., Stilla, R., Prather, S. C., & Sathian, K. (2004). Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 251-259.
52. Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2003). Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 320-330. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1365-5.