An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description

Attention and Performance

Volumn 16, Issue , 1996, Pages 92-121

  Hummel, John E ^a   Stankiewicz, Brian J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349099943     PISSN: 10470387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bergevin, R., and Levine, M. D. (1993). Generic object recognition: Building and matching course descriptions from line drawings. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 19-36.
2. Biederman, I. (1967). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., and Cooper, E. E. (1991a). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 595-593.
4. Biederman, I., and Cooper, E. E. (1991b). Priming contour deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
5. Biederman, I., and Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
6. Biederman, I., and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for 3-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
7. Bulthoff, H. H., and Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
8. Carlson-Radvanski, L., and Irwin, D. E. (1994). Memory for structural descriptions across eye movements. Submitted.
9. Clowes, M. B. (1967). Perception, picture processing and computers. In N. L. Collins & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence, vol. 1, 181-197. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
10. Cooper, E. E. (1994). Does global shape play a role in visual object priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Submitted.
11. Dickinson, S. J., Pentland, A. P., and Rosenfeld, A. (1992). 3-D shape recovery using distributed aspect matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14, 174-198.
12. Eckhom, R., Bauer, R., Jordan W., Brish, M., Kruse, W., Munk, M., and Reitboeck, H. J. (1988). Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Multiple electrode and correlation analysis in the cat. Biological Cybernetics. 60, 121-130.
13. Eckhom, R., Reitboeck, H., Arndt, M., and Dicke, P. (1990). Feature linking via synchronization among distributed assemblies: Simulations of results from cat visual cortex. Neural Computation, 2, 293-307.
14. Ellis, R., and Allport, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioral study. In A. G. Cohen and J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its applications, 245-257. New York: Wiley.
15. Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., and Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 775-796.
16. Enns, J. T. (1992). Sensitivity of early human vision to 3-D orientation in line-drawings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 143-169.
17. Farah, M. (1992). Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain-specificity in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 164-169.
18. Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel A. E., and Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit intercolumn synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature, 338, 334-337.
19. Gray, C. M., and Singer, W. (1989). Stimulus specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 86, 1698-1702.
20. Hoffman, D. D., and Richards, W. A. (1985). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
21. Hummel, J. E. (1994). Segmenting images at matched concavities with synchrony for binding. Technical report 94-1. Shape Perception Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles.
22. Hummel, J. E., and Biederman, I. (1990). Dynamic binding: A basis for the representation of shape by neural networks. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 614-621.
23. Hummel, J. E., and Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
24. Hummel, J. E., and Holyoak, K. J. (1993). Distributing structure over time. Review of L. Shastri and V. Ajjenegadde, From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 464.
25. Hummel J. E., and Stankiewicz, B, J. (1995). Representing spatial relations in object memory. Cognitive Psychology. Submitted.
26. Ichikawa, S. (1985). Quantitative and structural factors in the judgment of pattern complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 101-109.
27. Intraub, H. (1981). Identification and processing of briefly glimpsed visual scenes. In D. Fisher, R. A. Monty, and J. W. Sender (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception, 181-190. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Irwin, D. E. (1992). Perceiving an integrated visual world. In D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience - A silver jubilee, 121-142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 13, 289-303.
30. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual systems theory. Mind and Language, 5, 387-410.
31. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 2438.
32. Logan, G. D. (1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. In press.
33. Lowe, D. G. (1987). The viewpoint consistency constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 57-72.
34. Marr, D., and Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes. Proceeding of the Royal Society, London, B200, 269-294.
35. Marshall, J. A. (1990). A self-organizing scale-sensitive neural network. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, June, vol. 3, 649-654.
36. McClelland J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
37. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
38. Olshausen, B. A., Anderson, C. H., and Van Essen, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4700-4719.
39. Oram, M. W., Perrett, D. I. (1992). Journal of Neurophysiology, 68, 70-84.
40. Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
41. Paquet, L. (1992). Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 512-529.
42. Poggio, T., and Edelman, S. (1990). A neural network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 317, 314-319.
43. Poggio, T., and Vetter, T. (1992). Recognition and structure and from one 2-D model view: observations on prototypes, object classes, and symmetries. MIT AI memo 1347, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
44. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522.
45. Quintan, P. T. (1991). Differing approaches to two-dimensional shape recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 224-241.
46. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
47. Sanocki, T. (1993). Time course of object recognition: Evidence for a global-to-local contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 878-898.
48. Siebert, M., and Waxman, A. M. (1992). Learning and recognizing 3-D objects from multiple views in a neural system. In H. Wechsler (Ed.), Neural networks for perception. Vol. I, Human and machine perception, 427-444. New York: Academic Press.
49. Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159-216.
50. Stankiewicz, B. J., Hummel, J. E., and Cooper, E. E. (1995). The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images. In preparation.
51. Sutherland, N. S. (1968). Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B171, 95-103.
52. Tarr, M. J., and Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-283.
53. Tarr, M. J., and Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1(4), 253-256.
54. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
55. Tovee, M. J., Rolls, E. T., Treves, A., and Bellis, R. P. (1992). Information encoding and the responses of single neurons in the primate inferior temporal cortex. Preprint.
56. Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent, 5-35. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
57. Treisman, A., and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
58. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictoral descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
59. Ullman, S., and Basri, R. (1991). Recognition by liner combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1006.
60. von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. Internal report 81-2. Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry. Göttingen, Germany.
61. von der Malsburg, C., and Buhmann, J. (1992). Sensory segmentation with coupled neural oscillators. Biological Cybernetics, 67, 233-242.
62. Winston, P. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P. Winston, The psychology of computer vision, 157-209. New York: McGraw-Hill.