Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-42

  Newell, Fiona N ^a,c   Ernst, Marc O ^b   Tjan, Bosco S ^d   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; COGNITION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035236656     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00307     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
3. Easton, R.D., Green, A.J., & Srinivas, K. (1997). Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 403-410.
4. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3-D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385.
5. Gibson, J.J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-490.
6. Goodale, M.A., Meenan, J.P., Bülthoff, H.H., Nicolle, D.A., Murphy, K.J., & Racicot, C.I. (1994). Separate neural pathway for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604-610.
7. Goodale, M.A., Milner, D.A., Jakobson, L.S., & Carey, D.P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
8. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
9. Kennedy, J.M. (1993). Drawing and the blind: Pictures to touch. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Klatzky, R., Lederman, S.J., & Reed, C. (1987). There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 356-369.
11. Lederman, S.J., & Klatzky, R.L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342-368.
12. Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L., Chataway, C., & Summers, C.D. (1990). Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two dimensional pictures of common objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 54-64.
13. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H.H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition in monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
14. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
15. Millar, S. (1997). Reading by touch. London: Routledge.
16. Newell, F.N., & Findlay, J.M. (1997). Effects of depth rotation on object identification. Perception, 26, 1231-1257.
17. Palmer, S.E., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Reales, J.M., & Ballesteros, S. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 644-663.
19. Rock, I., & DiVita, J. (1987). A case of view-centred object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
20. Shimojo, S., Sasaki, M., Parsons, L.M., & Torii, S. (1989). Mirror reversal by blind subjects in cutaneous perception and motor production of letters and numbers. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 145-152.
21. Tarr, M.J., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views: Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.