The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 168-173

  Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto ^a  

^a MENICON CO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Corneal staining; Multipurpose solutions; Polyhexamethylene biguanide; Polyquad; Silicone hydrogels

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MICROSCOPY; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAINING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 33847189977     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00449.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amos, C. (2004) Performance of a new multipurpose solution used with silicone hydrogels. Optician 227, 18-22.
2. Bailey, I. L., Bullimore, M. A., Raasch, T. W. and Taylor, H. R. (1991) Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 422-432.
3. Burgalassi, S., Chetoni, P., Monti, D. and Saettone, M. F. (2001) Cytotoxicity of potential permeation enhancers evaluated on rabbit and human corneal epithelial cell lines. Toxicol. Lett. 122, 1-8.
4. Debbasch, C., DeLa Salle, S. B., Brignole, F., Rat, P., Warnet, J. M. and Baudouin, C. (2002) Cytoprotective effects of hyaluronic acid and carbomer 934P in ocular surface epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 3409-3415.
5. Du Toit, R., Pritchard, N., Heffernan, S., Simpson, T. and Fonn, D. (2002) A comparison of three different scales for rating contact lens handling. Optom. Vis. Sci. 79, 313-320.
6. Efron, N. (2004) Efron grading scales for contact lens complications. In: Contact Lens Complications (ed. N. Efron), Butterworth-Heinnemann, Oxford, pp. 239-243.
7. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F. and Buchner, A. (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 28, 1-11.
8. Garofalo, R. J., Dassanayake, N., Carey, C., Stein, J., Stone, R. and David, R. (2005) Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 31, 166-174.
9. Grant, W. M. (1986) Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd edn. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
10. Harvitt, D. and Bonnano, J. (1999) Reevaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal anoxia. Optom. Vis. Sci. 76, 712-719.
11. Holden, B. A. (1989) The ocular response to contact lens wear. Optom. Vis. Sci. 66, 717-733.
12. Holden, B. A. and Mertz, G. W. (1984) Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25, 1161-1167.
13. Holden, B. A., Stephenson, A., Stretton, S., Sankaridurg, P. R., O'Hare, N., Jalbert, I. and Sweeney, D. F. (2001) Superior arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom. Vis. Sci. 78, 9-12.
14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14155-1). (2003) Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Part 1: General requirements.
15. International Organization for Standardization: (ISO 14155-2). (2003) Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Part 2: Clinical investigation plans.
16. Jones, L., MacDougall, N. and Sorbara, L. G. (2002) Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom. Vis. Sci. 79, 753-761.
17. Lebow, K. A. and Schachet, J. L. (2003) Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with the use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 29, 213-220.
18. Maldonado-Codina, C., Morgan, P. B., Schnider, C. M. and Efron, N. (2004) Short-term physiological response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom. Vis. Sci. 81, 911-921.
19. McLaughlin, R. (2001) Rub vs. no rub: looking at MPS care solutions. Cont. Lens Spectr. 16, 40-45.
20. Morgan, P. B., Efron, N., Woods, C. A., Jones, D., Pesinova, A., Grein, H.-J., Tranoudis, I., Chandrinos, A., Itoi, M., Van Der Worp, E., Phillips, G., Belousov, V., Hellend, M., Thunholm-Henriksson, I. -L., Ong, A., Hung, L. K. and Barr, J. T. (2006) International contact lens prescribing in 2005. Cont. Lens Spectr. 21, 35-39.
21. Muller, G. and Kramer, A. (2000) In vivo action of a combination of selected antimicrobial agents and chondroitin sulphate. Chem. Biol. Interact. 124, 77-85.
22. Osborn, K. and Veys, J. (2005) A new silicone hydrogel lens for contact lens-related dryness. Part 1 - Material properties. Optician 229, 39-41.
23. Pritchard, N., Young, G., Coleman, S. and Hunt, C. (2003) Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 26, 3-9.
24. Ray, W. and O'Day, D. (1985) Statistical analysis of multieye data in ophthalmic research. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26, 1186-1188.
25. Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Mori, O. and Kawaminami, S. (2006) Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multi-purpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 26, 393.
26. Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Wolffsohn, J. S. and Gilmartin, B. (2006c) Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Optom. Vis. Sci. 83, 73-81.
27. Schwallie, J. D., McKenney, C. D., Long, W. D. and McNeil, A. (1997) Corneal staining patterns in normal non-contact lens wearers. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74, 92-98.
28. Sentell, K. and Beaullieu, E. (2004) Comparison of preservative uptake and release profiles of PHMB from soft contact lens care products by silicone hydrogels contact lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45 (ARVO E-abstract 1573).
29. Sivak, J. G., Herbert, K. L. and Segal, L. (1994) Ocular lens organ culture as a measure of ocular irritancy: the effects of surfactants. Toxicol. Methods 4, 56-65.
30. Soni, P. A., Horner, D. G. and Ross, J. (1996) Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft contact lens wearers. Optom. Vis. Sci. 73, 70-86.
31. Steffen, R. and Schnider, C. (2004) A next-generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1 - Material properties. Optician 227, 23-25.
32. Stiegemeier, M. J., Cedrone, R., Evans, D., Friederichs, G., Holle, D., Jenkins, W., Lutzi, D., Roberson, R., Schenker, H., White, E. and Zigler, L. (2004) Clinical performance of 'no rub' multi-purpose solutions. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 27, 65-74.
33. Tighe, B. (2000) Silicone hygrogel materials: how do they work? In: Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses (ed. D. F. Sweeney), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 1-21.
34. Vehige, J. G., Simmons, P. A., Anger, C., Graham, R., Tran, L. and Brandy, N. (2003) Cytoprotective properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) when used prior to wearing contact lenses treated with cationic disinfecting agents. Eye Contact Lens 29, 177-180.