The relation of learners' motivation with the process of collaborative scientific discovery learning

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 205-222

  Saab, Nadira ^a   van Joolingen, Wouter R ^b   van Hout Wolters, B H A M ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative scientific discovery learning; CSCL; Motivation; On line measures; Simulations

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449426818     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054980802649360     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Mediapsychology 3: 265-99.
3. Blatchford, P., P. Kutnick, E. Baines, and M. Galton. 2003. Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research 39: 153-72.
4. Bruinsma, M. 2004. Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction 14: 549-68.
5. Chan, C., J. Burtis, and C. Bereiter. 1997. Knowledge-building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction 15: 1-40.
6. Choi, N. 2005. Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students' academic performance. Psychology in the Schools 42: 197-204.
7. Covington, M.V. 2000. Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 171-200.
8. De Jong, T., and W.R. van Joolingen. 1998. Discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68: 179-201.
9. Eccles, J.S., and A. Wigfield. 2002. Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 53: 109-32.
10. Elliot, A.J. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist 34: 169-89.
11. Greene, B.A., and R.B. Miller. 1996. Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21: 181-92.
12. Greene, B.A., R.B. Miller, H.M. Crowson, B.L. Duke, and K.L. Akey. 2004. Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 462-82.
13. Johnson, D.W., and R.T. Johnson. 2003. Student motivation in co-operative groups. Social interdependence theory. In Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups, ed. R.M. Gillies and A.F. Ashman, 136-76. London/New York: Rout- ledgeFalmer.
14. Jones, A., and K. Issroff. 2005. Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 44: 395-408.
15. Lebie, L., J.A. Rhoades, and J.E. McGrath. 1996. Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4: 127-52.
16. Linnenbrink, E.A., and P.R. Pintrich. 2002. Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review 31: 313-27.
17. Njoo, M.K.H., and T. De Jong. 1993. Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instruction support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 821-44.
18. Pekrun, R., T. Goetz, W. Titz, and R.P. Perry. 2002. Academic emotions in students' selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37: 91-105.
19. Pintrich, P.R. 2000. An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 92-104.
20. Pintrich, P.R., and E.V. De Groot. 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 33-40.
21. Pintrich, P.R., D.A.F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W.J. McKeachie. 1993. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 801-13.
22. Richardson, J.T.E. 2004. Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review 16: 347-58.
23. Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68-78.
24. Saab, N. 2005. Chat and explore. The role of support and motivation in collaborative scientific discovery learning. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
25. Saab, N., W.R. van Joolingen, and B.H.A.M. van Hout-Wolters. 2005. Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 603-21.
26. Saab, N., W.R. van Joolingen, and B.H.A.M. van Hout-Wolters. 2007. Supporting communication in a collaborative discovery learning environment: The effect of instruction. Instructional Science 35: 73-98.
27. Schunk, D.H., and B.J. Zimmerman. 1997. Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist 32: 195-208.
28. Sins, P.H.M., van Joolingen, W.R., Savelsbergh, E.R., and B.H.A.M. van Hout-Wolters. 2008. Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students' achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33: 58-77.
29. Stahl, G. 2005. Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21: 79-90.
30. van Boxtel, C. 2000. Collaborative concept learning: Collaborative learning tasks, student interaction, and the learning of physics concepts. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
31. van der Linden, J., G. Erkens, H. Schmidt, and P. Renshaw. 2000. Collaborative Learning. In New Learning, ed. P.R.J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, and T. Duffy, 37-55. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. van Joolingen, W.R., and T. De Jong. 2003. SimQuest, authoring educational simulations. In Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments: Toward cost-effective adaptive, interactive, and intelligent educational software, ed. T. Murray, S. Blessing, and S. Ainsworth, 1-31. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. van Joolingen, W.R., De Jong, T., and A. Dimitrakopoulou. 2007. Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23: 111-9.
34. van Joolingen, W.R., T. De Jong, A.W. Lazonder, E.R. Savelsbergh, and S. Manlove. 2005. Co-lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior 21: 671-88.
35. Wegerif, R. 1996. Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum. Computers & Education 26: 51-60.
36. Wegerif, R., and N. Mercer. 1997. Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education 11: 271-86.
37. Wigfield, A., and J.S. Eccles. 2000. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 68-81.
38. Zimmerman, B.J. 1998. Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self- regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist 33: 73-86.
39. Zimmerman, B.J. 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 82-91.
40. Zusho, A., P.R. Pintrich, and B. Coppola. 2003. Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education 25: 1081-94.