Identifying commercially relevant Echinacea species by AFLP molecular markers

Genome

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 912-918

  Russi, Luigi ^a   Moretti, Chiaraluce ^a   Raggi, Lorenzo ^a   Albertini, Emidio ^a   Falistocco, Egizia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

AFLP; Commercial frauds; E. angustifolia; E. purpurea; Echinacea pallida; Species identification

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHINACEA; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MEDICINAL PLANT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; ECHINACEA; GENETIC VARIATION; PLANTS, MEDICINAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ECHINACEA ANGUSTIFOLIA; ECHINACEA PALLIDA; ECHINACEA PURPUREA;

EID: 70350655781     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G09-066     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adinolfi, B., Chicca, A., Martinotti, E., Breschi, M.C., and Nieri, P. 2007. Sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) analysis on DNA from the three medicinal Echinacea species. Fitoterapia, 78(1): 43-45.
2. Aiello, N. 1998. Echinacee, guida al riconoscimento. Erboristeria Domani, 2: 53-57.
3. Aziz, A.N., and Sauve, R.J. 2008. Genetic mapping of Echinacea purpurea via individual pollen DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Breed. 21(2): 227-232.
4. Barrett, B. 2003. Medicinal properties of Echinacea: a critical review. Phytomedicine, 10(1): 66-86.
5. Baum, B.R., Mechanda, S., Livesey, J.F., Binns, S.E., and Arnason, J.T. 2001. Predicting quantitative phytochemical markers in single Echinacea plants or clones from their DNA fingerprints. Phytochemistry, 56(6): 543-549.
6. Binns, S.E., Baum, B.R., and Arnason, J.T. 2002. A taxonomic revision of Echinacea (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Syst. Bot. 27: 610-632.
7. Cervera, M.T., Storme, V., Ivens, B., Gusmão, J., Liu, B.H., Hostyn, V., et al. 2001. Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Genetics, 158(2): 787-809.
8. Cnops, G., den Boer, B., Gerats, A., Van Montagu, M., and Van Lijsebettens, M. 1996. Chromosome landing at the Arabidopsis TORNADO1 locus using an AFLP-based strategy. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253: 31-41.
9. Dellaporta, S.L., Wood, J., and Hicks, J.B. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1(4): 19-21.
10. Gilmore, M.R. 1919. Uses of plants by the Indians of the Missouri River Region. In Thirty-third annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. pp.145-154.
11. Gower, J.C. 1966. Some distant properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53: 325-338.
12. Jaccard, P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270.
13. Joliffe, I.T. 1986. Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
14. Jones, C.J., Edwards, K.J., Castaglione, S., Winfield, M.O., Sala, F., van de Wiel, C., et al. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breed. 3(5): 381-390.
15. Kapteyn, J., Goldsbrough, B., and Simon, E. 2002. Genetic relationships and diversity of commercially relevant Echinacea species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105(2-3): 369-376.
16. Kim, D.H., Heber, D., and Still, D.W. 2004. Genetic diversity of Echinacea species based upon amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Genome, 47(1): 102-111.
17. Mantel, N.A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27(2): 209-220.
18. McGregor, R.L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 48: 113-142.
19. McKeown, K.A. 1999. A review of the taxonomy of the genus Echinacea. In Perspectives of new crops and new uses. Edited by J. Janick. ASHS Press, Alexandria, Va. pp.482-489.
20. Mechanda, S.M., Baum, B.R., Johnson, D.A., and Arnason, J.T. 2004a. Analysis of diversity of natural populations and commercial lines of Echinacea using AFLP. Can. J. Bot. 82(4): 461-484.
21. TM bands in Echinacea - implications for comparative biological studies. Genome, 47(1): 15-25.
22. Nieri, P., Adinolfi, B., Morelli, I., Breschi, M.C., Simoni, G., and Martinotti, E. 2003. Genetic characterization of the three medicinal Echinacea species using RAPD analysis. Planta Med. 69(7): 685-686.
23. Oomah, B.D., Dumon, D., Cardador-Martinez, A., and Godfrey, D.V. 2006. Characteristics of Echinacea seed oil. Food Chem. 96(2): 304-312.
24. Percival, S.S. 2000. Use of Echinacea in medicine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60(2): 155-158.
25. Peters, J.L., Constandt, H., Neyt, P., Cnops, G., Zethof, J., Zabeau, M., and Gerats, T. 2001. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127(4): 1579-1589.
26. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S., and Rafalski, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2(3): 225-238.
27. Qu, L., Wang, X., Hood, E., Wang, M., and Scalzo, R. 2004. Chromosome karyotypes of Echinacea angustifolia var. angustifolia and E.purpurea. HortScience, 39(2): 368-370.
28. Rohlf, F.J. 1993. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.8. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York.
29. Rokas, A., Williams, B.L., King, N., and Carroll, S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature, 425(6960): 798-804.
30. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
31. Sneath, P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.
32. Speroni, E., Govoni, P., Guizzardi, S., Renzulli, C., and Guerra, M.C. 2002. Anti-inflammatory and cicatrizing activity of Echinacea pallida Nutt. root extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 79(2): 265-272.
33. Still, D.W., Kim, D.H., and Aoyama, N. 2005. Genetic variation in Echinacea angustifolia along a climatic gradient. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 96(3): 467-477.
34. Tyler, V.E. 1997. The herbal remedies market. Chemtech, 27: 52-57.
35. Urbatsch, L.E., Baldwin, B.G., and Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed sequences (ITS) and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Syst. Bot. 25(3): 539-565.
36. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. 2007. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) [online database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Md. Available from http://www.ars-grin.gov/ [accessed 4 September 2007].
37. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23(21): 4407-4414.
38. Wolf, H.T., Zündorf, I., Winckler, T., Bauer, R., and Dingermann, T. 1999. Characterization of Echinacea species and detection of possible adulterations by RAPD analysis. Planta Med. 65(8): 773-774.