Genetic variation in Echinacea angustifolia along a climatic gradient

Annals of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 467-477

  Still, D W ^a   Kim, D H ^a   Aoyama, N ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AFLP; Climatic gradient; Echinacea angustifolia; Isolation by distance; Population differentiation; Selection pressure; Widespread species

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; GENETIC VARIATION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CLIMATE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECHINACEA; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CLIMATE; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA, PLANT; ECHINACEA; GENES, PLANT; PHYLOGENY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

GREAT PLAINS; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ECHINACEA ANGUSTIFOLIA;

EID: 23944501088     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci199     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Allard RW. 1988. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. Journal of Heredity 79: 225-238.
2. Allard RW. 1996. Genetic basis of evolution of adaptedness in plants. Euphytica 92: 1-11.
3. Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters A, Koornneef M, Lister C, Dean C, van den Bosch N, et al. 1998. Development of an AFLP based linkage map of Ler, Col and Cvi Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and construction of a Ler/Cvi recombinant inbred line population. The Plant Journal 14: 259-271.
4. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
5. Baskauf CJ, McCauley DE, Eickmeier WG. 1994. Genetic analysis of a rare and a widespread species of Echinacea (Asteraceae). Evolution 48: 180-188.
6. Becker B, Vos P, Kuiper M, Salamini F, Heun M. 1995. Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLP markers in barley. Molecular and General Genetics 249: 65-73.
7. Cervera M-T, Storme V, Ivens B, Gusamo J, Liu BH, Hostyn V, et al. 2001. Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Genetics 158: 787-809.
8. Despres L, Loriot S, Gaudeul M. 2002. Geographic pattern of genetic variation in the European globeflower Trollius europaeus L. (Ranunculaceae) inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 2337-2347.
9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin of the Botanical Society of America 19: 11-15.
10. Dyer RJ, Sork VL. 2001. Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Molecular Ecology 10: 859-866.
11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
12. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distance among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
13. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 13: 783-791.
14. Francisco-Ortega J, Crawford DJ, Santos-Suerra A, Sa-Fontinha S. 1995. Genetic divergence among Mediterranean and Macronesian genera of the subtribe Chrysantheminae (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1321-1328.
15. Futuyma DJ. 1998. Evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
16. Gitzendanner M, Soltis P. 2000. Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany 87: 783-792.
17. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296: 92-100.
18. Gower JC. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338.
19. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20. 2 populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 254-271.
21. Hansen M, Kraft T, Christiansson M, Nilsson N-O. 1999. Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 845-852.
22. Holman J, Hughes J, Fensham R. 2003. A morphological cline in Eucalyptus: a genetic perspective. Molecular Ecology 12: 3013-3025.
23. Hoopen TR, Robbins TP, Fransz PF, Montijn BM, Oud O, Gerats A, Nanninga N. 1996. Localization of T-DNA insertions in Petunia by fluorescence in situ hybridization: physical evidence for suppression of recombination. Plant Cell 8: 823-830.
24. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, van de Wiel C, et al. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding 3: 381-390.
25. Kapteyn J, Goldsbrough PB, Simon JE. 2002. Genetic relationships and diversity of commercially relevant Echinacea species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 369-376.
26. Keim P, Schupp J, Travis S, Clayton K, Webb DM. 1997. A high-density soybean genetic map based on AFLP markers. Crop Science 37: 537-543.
27. Kim D-H, Heber D, Still DW. 2004. Genetic diversity of Echinacea species based upon amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Genome 47: 102-111.
28. Kindscher K. 1989. Ethnobotany of purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia, Asteraceae) and other Echinacea species. Economic Botany 43: 498-507.
29. Legendre P, Fortin M-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
30. Levin D. 2003. Ecological speciation: lessons from invasive species. Systematic Botany 26: 643-650.
31. Li TSC. 1998. Echinacea: cultivation and medicinal value. HortTechnology 8: 122-129.
32. Liu B, Brubaker C, Mergeai G, Cronn R, Wendel J. 2001. Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes. Genome 44: 321-330.
33. Loveless M, Hamrick J. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 65-95.
34. McGregor RL. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48: 113-142.
35. Mechanda S, Baum B, Johnson D, Arnason J. 2004. Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP bands in Echinacea - implications for comparative biological studies. Genome 47: 15-25.
36. Mignouna H, Mank R, Ellis T, Van Den Bosch N, Asiedu R, Abang M, et al. 2002. A genetic linkage map of water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) based on AFLP markers and QTL analysis for anthracnose resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 726-735.
37. Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 5269-5273.
38. NOAA. 1988. Climatography of the United States. No. 20. Freeze/frost data. Asheville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.
39. NOAA. 2002. Climatography of the United States No. 85. Divisional normals and standard deviations of temperature, precipitation, and heating and cooling degree days 1971-2000 (and previous normals periods). Asheville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.
40. Percival SS. 2000. Use of Echinacea in medicine. Biochemical Pharmacology 60: 155-158.
41. Perez de la Vega M, Saenz-de-Miera LE, Allard RW. 1994. Ecogeographical distribution and differential adaptedness of multilocus allelic associations in Spanish oat Avena sativa L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 56-64.
42. Peters JL, Constandt H, Neyt P, Cnops G, Zethof J, Zabeau M, et al. 2001. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 127: 1579-1589.
43. Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, et al. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding 2: 225-238.
44. Powell W, Thomas WTB, Baird E, Lawrence P, Booth A. 1997. Analysis of quantitative traits in barley by the use of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Heredity 79: 48-59.
45. Quagliaro G, Vischi M, Tyrka M, Olivieri A. 2001. Identification of wild and cultivated sunflower for breeding purposes by AFLP markers. Genetics 92: 38-42.
46. Richards EJ, Dawe RK. 1998. Plant centromeres: structure and control. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 130-135.
47. Roseman CC. 2004. Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 12824-12829.
48. Rieseberg LH, Widmer A, Arntz AM, Burke JM. 2002. Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 12242-12245.
49. Rohlf FJ. 2002. NTSYSpc, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.
50. Rokas A, Williams B, King N, Carroll S. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
51. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4: 406-425.
52. Schnable P, Hsia A, Nikolau B. 1998. Genetic recombination in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 123-129.
53. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. 2000. Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis. Ver. 2.000. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Geneva.
54. Schultz J, Soltis P. 2001. Geographic divergence in Leptodactylon californicum (Polemoniaceae): insights from morphology, enzyme electrophoresis, and restriction site analysis of rDNA. Systematic Botany 26: 75-91.
55. Sharbel TF, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2000. Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe. Molecular Ecology 9: 2109-2118.
56. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 35: 627-632.
57. Spooner DM, Peralta IE, Knapp S. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.] Taxon 54: 43-61.
58. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Beta Version 10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
59. Travis SE, Maschinski J, Keim P. 1996. An analysis of genetic variation in Astragalus cremnophylax var. cremnophylax, a critically endangered plant, using AFLP markers. Molecular Ecology 5: 735-745.
60. van Eck HJ, Van der Voort JR, Draaistra J, Van Zandvoort E, Van Enckevort H. 1995. The inheritance and chromosomal localization of AFLP markers in a non-inbred potato offspring. Molecular Breeding 1: 397-410.
61. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
62. Vuylsteke M, Mank R, Brugmans B, Stam P, Kuiper M. 2000. Further characterization of AFLP data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Molecular Breeding 6: 265-276.
63. Weaver JE, Fitzpatrick TJ. 1934. The prairie. Ecological Monographs 4: 109-295.
64. Wright S. 1946. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31: 39-59.
65. Zhang L-B, Comes HP, Kadereit JW. 2001. Phylogeny and quaternary history of the European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. American Journal of Botany 88: 2331-2345.