Genetic diversity of Echinacea species based upon amplified fragment length polymorphism markers

Genome

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 102-111

  Kim, D H ^a   Heber, D ^b   Still, D W ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

AFLP; Distance; Echinacea; Genetic; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHINACEA; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECHINACEA; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; GENETIC MARKERS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ECHINACEA PURPUREA; ECHINACEA SANGUINEA; ECHINACEA SIMULATA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 1942520245     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g03-086     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alonso-Blanco, C., Peeters, A.J.M., Koornneef, M., Lister, C., Dean, C., van den Bosch, N., Pot, J., and Kuiper, M.T.R. 1998. Development of an AFLP based linkage map of Ler, Col and Cvi Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and construction of a Ler/Cvi recombinant inbred line population. Plant J. 14: 259-271.
2. Baskauf, C.J., McCauley, D.E., and Eickmeier, W.G. 1994. Genetic analysis of a rare and a widespread species of Echinacea (Asteraceae). Evolution, 48: 180-188.
3. Bentham, G. 1873. Compositae. In Genera plantarum. Edited by G. Bentham and J.D. Hooker. Reeve and Company, London, U.K. pp. 163-553.
4. Binns, S.E., Baum, B.R., and Arnason, J.T. 2001a. Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae:Asteraceae) and its implications for the correct naming of two Echinacea taxa. Taxon, 50: 1169-1175.
5. Binns, S.E., Baum, B.R., and Arnason, J.T. 2001b. Proposal to conserve the name Rudbeckia purpurea (Asteraceae) with a conserved type. Taxon, 50: 1199-1200.
6. Binns, S.E., Baum, B.R., and Arnason, J.T. 2002. A taxonomic revision of Echinacea (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Syst. Bot. 27: 610-632.
7. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics and classification. Timber Press, Portland, Oreg.
8. Cervera, M.-T., Storme, V., Ivens, B., Gusmao, J., Liu, B.H., Hostyn, V., Slycken, J.V., Van Montagu, M., and Boerjan, W. 2001. Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Genetics, 158: 787-809.
9. Cox, P.B., and Urbatsch, L.E. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of the coneflower genera (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Syst. Bot. 15: 394-402.
10. Cronquist, A. 1980. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States. Vol. 1. Asteraceae. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C.
11. Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology, 26: 297-302.
12. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
13. Elder, J.K., and Southern, E.M. 1987. Computer-aided analysis of one-dimensional restriction fragment gels. In Nucleic acid and protein sequence analysis - a practical approach. Edited by M.J. Bishop and J. Rawlings. IRL Press, Oxford, U.K. pp. 165-175.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 13: 783-791.
15. Fernald, M.L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. American Book Co., New York.
16. Fulton, T.M., Van der Hoeven, R., Eannetta, N.T., and Tanksley, S.D. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell, 14: 1457-1467.
17. Gower, J.C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53: 325-338.
18. Gray, A. 1884. Synoptical flora of North America. Vol. 1. Part 2. Ivison, Blademan, Taylor, and Co., New York.
19. Hansen, M., Kraft, T., Christiansson, M., and Nilsson, N.-O. 1999. Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 845-852.
20. Hill, M., Witsenboer, H., Zabeau, M., Vos, P., Kesseli, R., and Michelmore, RW. 1996. AFLP fingerprinting as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1202-1210.
21. Jansen, R.C., Geerlings, H., Van Oeveren, A.J., and Van Schaik, R.C. 2001. A comment on codominant scoring of AFLP markers. Genetics, 158: 925-926.
22. Jones, C.J., Edwards, K.J., Castaglione, S., Winfield, M.O., Sala, F., et al. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breed. 3: 381-390.
23. Kapteyn, J., Goldsbrough, P.B., and Simon, J.E. 2002. Genetic relationships and diversity of commercially relevant Echinacea species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 369-376.
24. Knox, E.B., and Palmer, J.D. 1995. The origin of Dendrosenecio within the Senecioneae (Asteraceae) based on plastid DNA evidence. Am. J. Bot. 82: 1567-1573.
25. Koopman, W.J.M., Zevenbergen, M.J., and Van den Berg, R.G. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca S.L. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1881-1887.
26. Ku, H.M., Vision, T., and Liu, J. 2000. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 9121-9126.
27. Malcomber, S.T. 2002. Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: evidence of a rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution, 56: 42-57.
28. McGregor, R.L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 48: 113-142.
29. Miyashita, N.T., Kawabe, A., and Innan, H. 1999. DNA variation in the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Genetics, 152: 1723-1731.
30. Nei, M., and Li, W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 5269-5273.
31. Paterson, A.H., Bowers, J.E., Burow, M.D., Draye, X., Elsik, C.G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C.S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., and Wright, R.J. 2000. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell, 12: 1523-1539.
32. Pelser, P.B., Gravendeel, B., and Van der Meijden, R. 2002. Tackling speciose genera: species composition and phylogenetic position of Senecio Sect. Jacobaea (Asteraceae) based on plastid and nrDNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 89: 929-939.
33. Percival, S.S. 2000. Use of Echinacea in medicine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60: 155-158.
34. Perdue, R.E. 1959. The somatic chromosomes of Rudbeckia and related genera of the Compositae. Contrib. Gray Herb. Harv. Univ. 185: 129-162.
35. Peters, J.L., Constandt, H., Neyt, P., Cnops, G., Zethof, J., Zabeau, M., and Gerats, T. 2001. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127: 1579-1589.
36. Piepho, H.-P., and Koch, G. 2000. Codominant analysis of banding data from a dominant marker system by normal mixtures. Genetics, 155: 1459-1468.
37. Polanco, C., and Ruiz, M.L. 2002. AFLP analysis of somaclonal variation in Arabidopsis thaliana regenerated plants. Plant Sci. 162: 817-824.
38. Remington, D.L., Whetten, R.W., Liu, B.-H., and O'Malley, D.M. 1999. Construction of an AFLP genetic map with nearly complete genome coverage in Pinus taeda. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1279-1292.
39. Robinson, H. 1978. Studies in the Heliantheae (Asteraceae). XIV. Validation of subtribes. Phytologia, 41: 39-44.
40. Robinson, H. 1981. A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits of the Heliantheae (Asteraceae). Smithson. Contrib. Bot. 51: 1-102.
41. Robinson, H., Powell, A.M., King, R.M., and Weedin, J.F. 1981. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. XII. Heliantheae. Smithson. Contrib. Bot. 52: 1-28.
42. Rohlf, F.J. 2002. NTSYSpc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system (version 8.00.133). Exeter Software, Setauket, N.Y.
43. Rossberg, M., Theres, K., Acarkan, A., Herrero, R., Schmitt, T., Schumacher, K., Schmitz, G., and Schmidt, R. 2001. Comparative sequence analysis reveals extensive microcolinearity in the Lateral suppressor regions of the tomato, Arabidopsis and Capsella genomes. Plant Cell, 13: 979-988.
44. Rouppe van der Voort, J.N.A.M., Van Zandvoort, P., Van Eck, J.H., Folkertsma, R.T., Hutten, R.C.B., Draaistra, J., Gommers, F.J., Jacobsen, E., Helder, J., and Bakker, J. 1997. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255: 438-447.
45. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
46. Schmidt, K., and Jensen, K. 2000. Genetic structure and AFLP variation of remnant populations in the rare plant Pedicularis palustris (Scrophulariaceae) and its relation to population size and reproductive components. Am. J. Bot. 87: 678-689.
47. Small, R.L., and Wendel, J.F. 2000. Phylogeny, duplication, and intraspecific variation of Adh sequences in new world diploid cottons (Gossypium L., Malvaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16: 73-84.
48. Soleimani, V.D., Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 2002. AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity estimates in modern cultivars of durum wheat [Triticum turgidum L. subsp. Durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 350-357.
49. Stuessy, T.F. 1977. Heliantheae B sytematic review. In The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Edited by V.H. Heywood, J.B. Harborne, and B.L. Turner. Academic Press, London, U.K. pp. 621-671.
50. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Beta version 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
51. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature (London), 408: 796-815.
52. Travis, S.E., Maschinski, J., and Keim, P. 1996. An analysis of genetic variation in Astragalus cremnophylax var. cremnophylax, a critically endangered plant, using AFLP markers. Mol. Ecol. 5: 735-745.
53. Urbatsch, L.E., and Jansen, R.K. 1995. Phylogenetic affinities among and within the coneflower genera (Asteraceae, Heliantheae), a chloroplast DNA analysis. Syst. Bot. 20: 28-39.
54. Urbatsch, L.E., Baldwin, B.G., and Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Syst. Bot. 25: 539-565.
55. Vos, P.R., Hogers, M., Bleeker, M., Van de Lee Rijans, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Kuiper, M., and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
56. Vuylsteke, M., Mank, R., Brugmans, B., Stam, P., and Kuiper, M. 2000. Further characterization of AFLP data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Mol. Breed. 6: 265-276.
57. Wolf, H.T., Zundorf, H., Winkler, T., Hauer, R., and Dinqermann, T.H. 1999. Characterization of Echinacea species and detection of possible adulterations by RAPD analysis. Planta Med. 65: 773-774.
58. Yu, G.-X., and Wise, R.P. 2000. An anchored AFLP- and retrotransposon-based map of diploid Avena. Genome, 43: 736-749.