Analysis of diversity of natural populations and commercial lines of Echinacea using AFLP

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 461-484

  Mechanda, Subbaiah M ^a   Baum, Bernard R ^a   Johnson, Douglas A ^b   Arnason, John T ^b  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

AFLP band homologies; Echinacea; Multivariate analysis; Population genetic analysis

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CLONING; ECOSYSTEMS; GENE TRANSFER; MUTAGENESIS;

SEQUENCE SIMILARITY; TAXONOMIC REVISION;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

BIODIVERSITY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

ECHINACEA ATRORUBENS; ECHINACEA LAEVIGATA; ECHINACEA PALLIDA; ECHINACEA PURPUREA; EMBRYOPHYTA; UNIDENTIFIED PLANT;

EID: 3042785079     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b04-006     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Anderson, T.W. 1984. An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
3. Backeljau, T., de Bruyn, L., de Wolf, H., Jordaens, K., van Dongen, S., Verhagen, R., and Winnepenninckx, B. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and parsimony methods. Cladistics, 11: 119-130.
4. Badr, A., El Shazly, H., El Rabey, H., and Watson, L.E. 2002. Systematic relationships in Lathyrus sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data. Can. J. Bot. 80: 962-969.
5. Baum, B.R., Mechanda, S.M., Livesey, J.F., Binns, S. E., and Arnason, J.T. 2001. Predicting quantitative phytochemical markers in single Echinacea plants or clones from their DNA fingerprints. Phytochemistry (Oxf.), 56: 543-549.
6. Binns, S.E., Baum, B.R., and Arnason, J.T. 2002. A taxonomic revision of the genus Echinacea. (Heliatheae: Asteraceae). Syst. Bot. 27: 610-632.
7. Blumenthal, M. 1992. Conserving wild medicines. Whole Foods, June 1992: 20-21.
8. Bonnema, G., van den Berg, P., and Lindhout, P. 2002. AFLPs mark different genomic regions compared with RFLPs: a case study in tomato. Genome, 45: 217-221.
9. Borchers, A.T., Keen, C.L., Stern, J.S., and Gershwin, M.E. 2000. Inflammation and native American medicine: the role of botanicals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72: 339-47.
10. Brevoort, T. 1996. US botanical market, an overview. HerbalGram, 36: 49-57.
11. Buntjer, J.B., Otsen, M., Nijman, I.J., Kuiper, M.T., and Lenstra, J.A. 2002. Phlogeny of the bovine species based on AFLP fingerprinting. Heredity, 88: 46-51.
12. Breyne, P., Rombaut, D., Van, A., Van, M., and Gerats, T. 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261: 627-634.
13. Clark, A.G., and Lanigan, C.M.S. 1993. Prospects for estimating nucleotide divergence with RAPDs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1096-1111.
14. Coart, E., Lamote, V., De Loose, M., Van Bockstaele, E., Lootens, P., and Roldan-Ruiz, I. 2002. AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species (Quercus robus L., and Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl.) in Finnish populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1-8.
15. Cochrane, W.G., and Hopkins, C.E. 1961. Some classification problems with multivariate qualitative data. Biometrics, 17: 10-32.
16. Cover, T.M., and Hart, P.E. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 13: 21-27.
17. Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology, 26: 297-302.
18. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
19. Droogenbroeck, B.V., Breyne, P., Goetghebeur, P., Romeijn-Peeters, E., Kyndt, T., and Gheysen, G. 2002. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among papaya and its wild relatives (Caricaceae) from Ecuador. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 1-8.
20. El-Rabey, H.A., Badr, A., Schear-Pregl, R., Martin, W., and Salamini, F. 2002. Speciation and species separation in Hordeum L. (Poaceae) resolved by discontinuous molecular markers. Plant Biol. 4: 1-9.
21. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E., and Quattro, J.M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131: 479-491.
22. Foster, S. 1991. Echinacea: nature's immune enhancer. Healing Arts Press, Rochester, Vt.
23. Ganter, P.F., and de Barros Lopes, M. 2000. The use of anonymous DNA markers in assessing worldwide relatedness in yeast species Pichia kluyveri Bedford and Kudrjavzev. Can. J. Microbiol. 46: 967-980.
24. Giannasi, N., Thorpe, R.S., and Malhotra, A. 2001. The use of amplified fragment length polymorphism in determining species trees at fine taxonomic levels: analysis of medically important snake, Trimeresurus albolabris. Mol. Ecol. 10: 419-426.
25. Gilbert, E.S. 1968. On discrimination using qualitative variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63: 1399-1412.
26. Gobert, V., Moja, S., Colson, M., and Tabarlet, P. 2002. Hybridization in the section Mentha (Lamiaceae) inferred from AFLP markers. Am. J. Bot. 89: 2017-2023.
27. Guan, S., Xu, R., Chen, S., Odumeru, J., and Gyles, C. 2002. Development of a procedure for discriminating among E. coli isolates from animal and human sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 2690-2698.
28. Hedren, M., Fay, M.F., and Chase, M.W. 2001. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1868-1880.
29. Hill, M., Witsenboer, H., Zabeau, M., Vos, P., Kesseli, R., and Michelmore, R. 1996. PCR based fingerprinting using AFLP as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1202-1210.
30. Hobbs, C. 1994. Echinacea. A literature review. HerbalGram, 30: 33-48.
31. Hodkinson, T.R., Chase, M.W., and Renvoize, S.A. 2002. Characterization of a genetic resource collection for Miscanthus (Sacharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 89: 627-636.
32. Huff, D.R., Peakall, R., and Smouse, P.E. 1993. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloé dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 927-934.
33. Ipek, M., and Simon, P. 2003. Sequence characterization pf polymorphic AFLP fragments in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Plant & Animal Genome XI. Final abstracts guide: 245. Poster abstract P685.
34. Jones, C.J., Edwards, K.J., Castaglione, S., Winfield, M.O., Sala, F., van de Wiel, C., Bredemeijer, G., Vosman, B., Matthes, M., Daly, A., Brettschneider, R., Bettini, P., Buiatti, M., Maestri, E., Malcevschi, A., Marmiroli, N., Aert, R., Volckaert, G., Rueda, J., Linacero, R., Vasquez, A., and Karp, A. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP, and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol. Breed. 3: 381-390.
35. Kapteyn, J., Goldsbrough, P.B., and Simon, J.E. 2002. Genetic relationships and diversity of commercially relevant Echinacea species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 369-376.
36. Kardolus, J.P., van Eck, H.J., and van den Berg, J. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solatium taxonomy (Solanaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 210: 87-103.
37. Keim, P., Kalif, A., Schupp, J., Hill, K., Travis, S.E., Richmond, K., Adair, M., Jones, M.H., Kuske, C.R., and Jackson, P. 1997. Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. J. Bacteriol. 179: 818-824.
38. Kim, D.H., and Still, D.W. 2003. Genetic diversity and phenetic relationships among Echinacea species. Plant & Animal Genome XI. Final abstracts guide: 132. Poster abstract P229.
39. Koopman, W.J.M. 2000. Identifying lettuce species (Lactuca subsect. Lactuca, Asteraceae): a practical application of flow cytometry. Euphytica, 116: 151-159.
40. Koopman, W.J.M., and De Jong, D.H. 1996. A numerical analysis of karyotypes and DNA amounts in lettuce cultivars and species (Lactuca subsect. Lactuca, Compositae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 211-222.
41. Koopman, W.J.M., Zevenbergen, M.J., and van den Berg, R.G. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca S.L. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprinting. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1881-1887.
42. Krzanowski, W.J. 1975. Discrimination and classification using both binary and continuous variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70: 782-790.
43. Kshirsagar, A.M. 1972. Multivariate analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York.
44. Lachenbruch, P.A., and Mickey, M.A. 1968. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics, 10: 1-10.
45. Lombard, V., Baril, C.P., Dubreuil, P., Blouet, D., and Zhang, G. 2000. Genetic relationships and fingerprinting of rapeseed cultivars by AFLP: consequences for varietal registration. Crop Sci. 40: 1417-1425.
46. Mace, E.S., Lester, R.N., and Gebhardt, C.G. 1999a. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant Solarium melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 626-633.
47. Mace, E.S., Lester, R.N., and Gebhardt, C.G. 1999b. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 634-641.
48. Mechanda, S.M., Baum, B.R., Johnson, D.A., and Arnason, J.T. 2004. Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP® bands in Echinacea - implications for comparative studies. Genome, 47: 15-25.
49. Miller, M.P. 1997. Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA). Version 1.3. A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data [computer program]. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA. Available from http://bioweb.usu.edu/mpmbio/ index.htm [accessed 2002].
50. Mueller, U.G., and Wolfenbarger, L.L. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 389-394.
51. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
52. McGregor, R.L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 48: 113-142.
53. Mengistu, L.W., Mueller-Warrant, G.W., and Barker, R.E. 2000. Genetic diversity of Poa annua in western Oregon grass seed crops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 70-79.
54. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
55. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3321-3323.
56. Nicholas, K.B., and Nicholas, H.B., Jr. 1997. Genedoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments [computer program]. Multiple sequence alignment and shading utility, Version 2.6.002. Available from http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc [updated 2001].
57. Nilsson, N.O., Hansen, M., Panagopoulos, A.H., Tuvesson, S., Ehlde, M., Christiansson, I.M., Rading, M.R., and Kraft, T. 1999. QTL analysis of Cercospora leaf spot resistance in sugar beet. Plant Breed. 118: 327-334.
58. Ogden, R., and Thorpe, R.S. 2002. The usefulness of amplified length polymorphism markers for taxon discrimination across graduated fine evolutionary levels in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Mol. Ecol. 11: 437-45.
59. Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E., and Huff, D.R. 1995. Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioeocious buffalograss Buchloë dactyloides. Mol. Ecol. 4: 135-147.
60. Pimentel, R.A. 1979. Morphometrics. The multivariate analysis of biological data. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque.
61. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S., and Rafalski, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2: 225-238.
62. Quagliaro, G., Vischi, M., Tyrka, M., and Olivieri, M. 2001. Identification of wild and cultivated Sunflower for breeding purposes by AFLP markers. J. Hered. 92: 38-42.
63. Raamsdonk, L.W.D., Vrielink van Ginkel, M., and Kik, C. 2000. Phylogeny reconstruction and hybrid analysis in Allium subgenus Rhizirideum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1000-1009.
64. Rao, C.R. 1952. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. Wiley, N.Y.
65. Reamon-Buttner, S.M., Smidt, T., and Jung, C. 1999. AFLPs represent highly repetitive sequences in Asparagus officinalis L. Chromosome Res. 7: 297-304.
66. Rohlf, F.J. 2000. NTSYSpc. Numerical axonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.02 [computer program]. Exeter software, Setauket, N.Y.
67. Roldán-Ruiz, I., van Euwijk, F.A., Gilliland, T.J., Dubreuil, P., Dillmann, C., Lallemand, J., De Loose, M., and Baril, C.P. 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1138-1150.
68. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press., Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
69. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT® user's guide, Version 8.2 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
70. Schneider, S., Roessli, D., and Excofier, L. 2001. Arlequin©: a software for population genetics data analysis, Version 2.001 [computer program]. Genetics and Biometry Lab, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
71. Semagn, K., Bjornstad, A., Stedje, B., and Bekele, E. 2000. Comparison of multivariate methods for the analysis of genetic resources and adaptation in Phytolacca dodecandra using RAPD. Theor Appl. Genet. 101: 1145-1154.
72. Snow, R. 1963. Alcoholic hydrochloric acid-carmine as a stain for chromosomes in root tip squash preparations. Stain Technol. 38: 9-13.
73. Sokal, R.R., and Michener, C.D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38: 1409-1438.
74. Soleimani, V.D., Baum, B.R., and Johnson, D.A. 2002. Identification of Canadian durum wheat [Triticum turgidum L. subsp. Durum (Desf.) Husn.] cultivars using AFLP and their STS markers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82: 35-41.
75. Steiger, B.L., Nagai, C., Moore, P.H., Morden, C.W., Osgood, R.V., and Ming, R. 2002. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and among Coffea arabica cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 209-215.
76. Swofford, D.L. 1999. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and other methods, Version 4 [computer program]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
77. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibbons, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighing, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
78. Tomkins, J.P., Wood, T.C., Barnes, L.S., Westman, A., and Wing, R.A. 2001. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 489-496.
79. Tyler, V.E. 1993. Phytomedicines in Western Europe. Potential impact on herbal medicine in the United States. In Human medicinal agents from plants. Edited by A.D. Klinghorn and M.F. Balandrin. ACS Symposium Series No. 534. pp. 25-37.
80. Urbatsch, L.E., and Jansen, R.K. 1995. Phylogenetic affinities among and within the cone flower genera (Asteracea, Heliantheae): a chloroplast DNA analysis. Syst. Bot. 20: 28-39.
81. Urbatsch, L.E, Baldwin, B.G., and Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Helaitheae: Asteracea) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Syst. Bot. 25: 539-565.
82. van den Berg, R.G., Bryan, G.J., Del Rio, A., and Spooner, D.M. 2002. Reduction of species in the wild potato Solatium section Petota series Longipedicellata: AFLP, RAPD and chloroplast SSR data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 1109-1114.
83. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Freijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 4407-4414.
84. Wong, A., Forbes, M.R., and Smith, M.L. 2001. Characterization of AFLP markers in damselflies: prevalence of co-dominant markers and implication for population genetic applications. Genome, 44: 677-684.
85. Yeh, F.C., and Boyle, T. 1997. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg. J. Bot. 129: 157-163.
86. Zande, L., and van de Bijlsma, R. 1995. Limitations of the RAPD technique in phylogeny reconstruction in Drosophila, J. Evol. Biol. 8: 645-656.