Groucho corepressor functions as a cofactor for the Knirps short-range transcriptional repressor

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 41, 2009, Pages 17314-17319

  Payankaulam, Sandhya ^a   Arnosti, David N ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; C TERMINAL BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN GROUCHO; PROTEIN KNIRP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; GENE REPRESSION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; DNA; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; KINETICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; TISSUE EXTRACTS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 70350465131     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904507106     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gray S, Levine M (1996) Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev 10:700-710. (Pubitemid 26112424)
2. Courey AJ, Jia S (2001) Transcriptional repression: The long and the short of it. Genes Dev 15:2786-2796.
3. Martinez CA, Arnosti DN (2008) Spreading of a corepressor linked to action of long-range repressor Hairy. Mol Cell Biol 8:2792-2802.
4. Nibu Y, Zhang H, Levine M (1998) Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo. Science 280:101-104. (Pubitemid 28169090)
5. Paroush Z, et al. (1994) Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins. Cell 79:805-815. (Pubitemid 24371971)
6. Smith ST, Jaynes JB (1996) A conserved regions of engrailed, shared among all en-, gsc-, Nk1-, Nk2-, and msh-class homeoproteins, mediates active transcriptional repression in vivo. Development 122:3141-3150.
7. Chinnadurai G (2007) Transcriptional regulation by C-terminal binding proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39:1593-1607.
8. Pagan JK, et al. (2007) A novel corepressor, BCoR-L1, represses transcription through an interaction with CtBP. J Biol Chem 282:15248-15257.
9. Nibu Y, et al. (1998) dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 17:7009-7020. (Pubitemid 28550295)
10. Jimenez G, Paroush Z, Ish-Horowicz D (1997) Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed. Genes Dev 11:3072-3082. (Pubitemid 27508516)
11. Tolkunova EN, Fujioka M, Kobayashi M, Deka D, Jaynes JB (1998) Two distinct types of repression domain in Engrailed: One interacts with the Groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes. Mol Cell Biol 18:2804-2814. (Pubitemid 28183449)
12. Flores-Saaib RD, Courey AJ (2000) Analysis of Groucho-histone interactions suggests mechanistic similarities between Groucho- and Tup1-mediated repression. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4189-4196.
13. Chen G, Fernandez J, Mische S, Courey AJ (1999) A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor Groucho in Drosphila development. Genes Dev 13:2218-2230. (Pubitemid 29426727)
14. Cai HN, Arnosti DN, Levine M (1996) Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:9309-9314.
15. Dubnicoff T, et al. (1997) Conversion of Dorsal from an activator to a repressor by the global corepressor Groucho. Genes Dev 11:2952-2957. (Pubitemid 27508507)
16. Strunk B, et al. (2001) Role of CtBP in transcriptional repression by the Drosophila Giant protein. Dev Biol 15:229-240. (Pubitemid 33108836)
17. Keller S, et al. (2000) dCtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of the Drosophila Knirps protein. Mol Cell Biol 20:7247-7258.
18. Hewitt GF, et al. (1999) Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila Giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126:1201-1210.
19. Sutrias-Grau M, Arnosti DN (2004) CtBP contributes quantitatively to Knirps epression activity in an NAD binding-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 24:5953-5966. (Pubitemid 38787978)
20. Kulkarni MM, Arnosti DN (2005) cis-regulatory logic of short-range transcriptional repression in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 25:3411-3420.
21. Ryu JR, Arnosti DN (2003) Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities. Nucleic Acids Res 31:4654-4662.
22. Struffi P, Corado M, Kulkarni M, Arnosti DN (2004) Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps. Development 131:2419-2429. (Pubitemid 38877649)
23. Struffi P, Arnosti DN (2005) Functional interaction between the Drosophila Knirps short-range transcriptional repressor and RPD3 histone deacetylase. J Biol Chem 280:40757-40765. (Pubitemid 41780566)
24. Clyde DE, et al. (2003) A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila. Nature 426:849-853.
25. Delidakis C, Preiss A, Hartley DA, Artavanis-Tsakonas S (1991) Two genetically and molecularly distinct functions involved in early neurogenesis reside within the Enhancer of split locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 129:803-823.
26. Gerwin N, et al. (1994) Functional and conserved domains of the Drosophila transcription factor encoded by the segmentation gene knirps. Mol Cell Biol 14:7899-7908. (Pubitemid 24373539)
27. Poortinga G, Watanabe M, Parkhurst SM (1998) Drosophila CtBP: A Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J 17:2067-2078. (Pubitemid 28154535)
28. Zhang H, Levine M (1999) Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:535-540. (Pubitemid 29061243)
29. Hasson P, Müller B, Basler K, Paroush Z (2001) Brinker requires two corepressors for maximal and versatile repression in Dpp signalling. EMBO J 20:5725-5736. (Pubitemid 33010049)
30. Andrioli LP, Oberstein AL, Corado MS, Yu D, Small S (2004) Groucho-dependent repression by sloppy-paired 1 differentially positions anterior pair-rule stripes in the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol 15:541-551. (Pubitemid 39592412)
31. Sekiya T, Zaret KS (2007) Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg proteins: Genomic site recruitment generates compacted chromatin in vitro and impairs activator binding in vivo. Mol Cell 28:291-303. (Pubitemid 47600002)
32. Song H, Hasson P, Paroush Z, Courey AJ (2004) Groucho oligomerization is required for repression in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 10:4341-4350. (Pubitemid 41071004)
33. Jennings BH, et al. (2006) Molecular recognition of transcriptional repressor motifs by the WD domain of the Groucho/TLE corepressor. Mol Cell 22:645-655.
34. Nibu Y, Zhang H, Levine M (2001) Local action of long-range repressors in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 20:2246-2253. (Pubitemid 32410594)
35. Jennings BH, Wainwright SM, Ish-Horowicz D (2008) Differential in vivo requirements for oligomerization during Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO Rep 9:76-83.
36. Shi Y, et al. (2003) Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature 422: 735-738. (Pubitemid 36514114)
37. Kadonaga JT, Tjian R (1986) Affinity purification of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5889-5893. (Pubitemid 16000619)
38. Orian A, et al. (2007) A Myc-Groucho complex integrates EGF and Notch signaling to regulate neural development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15771-21577 (Pubitemid 350035375)