Spreading of a corepressor linked to action of long-range repressor hairy

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2792-2802

  Martinez, Carlos A ^a,b   Arnosti, David N ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; HISTONE H3; HISTONE H4; PROTEIN GROUCHO; PROTEIN HAIRY; PROTEIN KNIRPS; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; ENHANCER REGION; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CHROMATIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); REPRESSOR PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSGENES;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 42149135457     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01203-07     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arnosti, D. N. 2004. Multiple mechanisms of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes, p. 33-67. In M. Gossen, J. Kaufmann, and S. J. Triezenberg (ed.), Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
2. Arnosti, D. N., S. Gray, S. Barolo, J. Zhou, and M. Levine. 1996. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 15:3659-3666.
3. Barolo, S., and M. Levine. 1997. hairy mediates dominant repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 16:2883-2891.
4. Beuchle, D., G. Struhl, and J. Muller. 2001. Polycomb group proteins and heritable silencing of Drosophila Hox genes. Development 128:993-1004.
5. Bianchi-Frias, D., A. Orian, J. J. Delrow, J. Vazquez, A. E. Rosales-Nieves, and S. M. Parkhurst. 2004. Hairy transcriptional repression targets and cofactor recruitment in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2:e178.
6. Carrozza, M. J., S. John, A. K. Sil, J. E. Hopper, and J. L. Workman. 2002. Gal80 confers specificity on HAT complex interactions with activators. J. Biol. Chem. 277:24648-24652.
7. Chen, G., J. Fernandez, S. Mische, and A. J. Courey. 1999. A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor Groucho in Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 13:2218-2230.
8. Chen, G., and A. J. Courey. 2000. Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression. Gene 249:1-16.
9. Courey, A. J., and S. Jia. 2001. Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. Genes Dev. 15:2786-2796.
10. Davie, J. K., D. G. Edmondson, C. B. Coco, and S. Y. Dent. 2003. Tup1-Ssn6 interacts with multiple class I histone deacetylases in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 278:50158-50162.
11. Davie, J. K., R. J. Trumbly, and S. Y. Dent. 2002. Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:693-703.
12. Davis, R. L., and D. L. Turner. 2001. Vertebrate hairy and Enhancer of split related proteins: transcriptional repressors regulating cellular differentiation and embryonic patterning. Oncogene 20:8342-8357.
13. Ducker, C. E., and R. T. Simpson. 2000. The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome. EMBO J. 19:400-409.
14. Flores-Saaib, R. D., and A. J. Courey. 2000. Analysis of Groucho-histone interactions suggests mechanistic similarities between Groucho- and Tup1-mediated repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4189-4196.
15. Gilmour, D. S., and J. T. Lis. 1986. RNA polymerase II interacts with the promoter region of the noninduced hsp70 gene in Drosophila melanogaster cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3984-3989.
16. Gray, S., P. Szymanski, and M. Levine. 1994. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8:1829-1838.
17. Green, S. R., and A. D. Johnson. 2005. Genome-wide analysis of the functions of a conserved surface on the corepressor Tup1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:2605-2613.
18. Gyuris J., E. Golemis, H. Chertkov, and R. Brent. 1993. Cdi1, a human G1 and S phase protein phosphatase that associates with Cdk2. Cell 75:791-803.
19. Hallberg, M., G. Z. Hu, S. Tronnersjo, Z. Shaikhibrahim, D. Balciunas, S. Bjorklund, and H. Ronne. 2006. Functional and physical interactions within the middle domain of the yeast mediator. Mol. Genet. Genomics 276:197-210.
20. Hewitt, G. F., B. S. Strunk, C. Margulies, T. Priputin, X. D. Wang, R. Amey, B. A. Pabst, D. Kosman, J. Reinitz, and D. N. Arnosti. 1999. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126:1201-1210.
21. Huang, L., W. Zhang, and S. Y. Roth. 1997. Amino termini of histones H3 and H4 are required for α1-α2 repression in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6555-6562.
22. Ingham, P., K. R. Howard, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1985. Transcription pattern of the Drosophila segmentation gene hairy. Nature 318:439-445.
23. Jennings, B. H., S. M. Wainwright, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 23 November 2007, posting date. Differential in vivo requirements for oligomerization during Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO Rep. 9:76-83. [Epub ahead of print.]
24. Jiang, J., H. Cai, Q. Zhou, and M. Levine. 1993. Conversion of a dorsal-dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. EMBO J. 12:3201-3209.
25. King, I. F. G., N. J. Francis, and R. E. Kingston. 2002. Native and recombinant polycomb group complexes establish a selective block to template accessibility to repress transcription in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7919-7928.
26. Kulkarni, M. M., and D. N. Arnosti. 2003. Information display by transcriptional enhancers. Development 130:6569-6575.
27. Kulkarni, M. M., and D. N. Arnosti. 2005. cis-regulatory logic of short-range transcriptional repression in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3411-3420.
28. Kurdistani, S. K., and M. Grunstein. 2003. In vivo protein-protein and protein-DNA crosslinking for genomewide binding microarray. Methods 31:90-95.
29. Larschan, E., and F. Winston. 2001. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15:1946-1956.
30. Lee, M., S. Chatterjee, and K. Struhl. 2000. Genetic analysis of the role of Pol II holoenzyme components in repression by the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor in yeast. Genetics 155:1535-1542.
31. Moazed, D., A. D. Rudner, J. Huang, G. J. Hoppe, and J. C. Tanny. 2004. A model for step-wise assembly of heterochromatin in yeast. Novartis Found. Symp. 259:48-62.
32. Muller, J., and J. A. Kassis. 2006. Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16:476-484.
33. Nalley, K., S. A. Johnston, and T. Kodadek. 2006. Proteolytic turnover of the Gal4 transcription factor is not required for function in vivo. Nature 442:1054-1057.
34. Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, E. Bajor, S. Barolo, S. Small, and M. Levine. 1998. dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 17:7009-7020.
35. Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, and M. Levine. 2001. Local action of long-range repressors in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 20:2246-2253.
36. Ohsako, S., J. Hyer, G. Panganiban, I. Oliver, and M. Caudy. 1994. Hairy function as a DNA-binding helix-loop-helix repressor of Drosophila sensory organ formation. Genes Dev. 8:2743-2755.
37. Paroush, Z., R. L. Finley, Jr., T. Kidd, S. M. Wainwright, P. W. Ingham, R. Brent, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1994. Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation, and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins. Cell 79:805-815.
38. Pirrotta, V. 1988. Vectors for P-mediated transformation in Drosophila. Biotechnology 10:437-456.
39. Poortinga, G., M. Watanabe, and S. M. Parkhurst. 1998. Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 17:2067-2078.
40. Rosenberg, M. I., and S. M. Parkhurst. 2002. Drosophila Sir2 is required for heterochromatic silencing and by euchromatic Hairy/E(Spl) bHLH repressors in segmentation and sex determination. Cell 109:447-458.
41. Rushlow, C. A., A. Hogan, S. M. Pinchin, K. M. Howe, M. Lardelli, and D. Ish-Horowicz. 1989. The Drosophila hairy protein acts in both segmentation and bristle patterning and shows homology to N-myc. EMBO J. 8:3095-3103.
42. Schwartz, Y. B., and V. Pirrotta. 2007. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:9-22.
43. Sekinger, E. A., and D. S. Gross. 1999. SIR repression of a yeast heat shock gene: UAS and TATA footprints persist within heterochromatin. EMBO J. 18:7041-7055.
44. Sekiya, T., and K. S. Zaret. 2007. Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg proteins: genomic site recruitment generates compacted chromatin in vitro and impairs activator binding in vivo. Mol. Cell 28:291-303.
45. Small, S., D. N. Arnosti, and M. Levine. 1993. Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119:762-772.
46. Small, S., A. Blair, and M. Levine. 1992. Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 11:4047-4057.
47. Song, H., P. Hasson, Z. Paroush, and A. J. Courey. 2004. Groucho oligomerization is required for repression in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4341-4350.
48. Stebbins, J. L., and S. J. Triezenberg. 2004. Identification, mutational analysis, and coactivator requirements of two distinct transcriptional activation domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hap4 protein. Eukaryot. Cell 3:339-347.
49. Takebayashi, K., Y. Sasai, Y. Sakai, T. Watanabe, S. Nakanishi, and R. Kageyama. 1994. Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5150-5156.
50. Tripic, T., D. G. Edmondson, J. K. Davie, B. D. Strahl, and S. Y. Dent. 2006. The Set2 methyltransferase associates with Ssn6 yet Tup1-Ssn6 repression is independent of histone methylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 339:905-914.
51. Van Doren, M., A. M. Bailey, J. Esnayra, K. Ede, and J. W. Posakony. 1994. Negative regulation of proneural gene activity: hairy is a direct transcriptional repressor of achaete. Genes Dev. 8:2729-2742.
52. Wang, X., C. Lee, D. S. Gilmour, and J. P. Gergen. 2007. Transcription elongation controls cell fate specification in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21:1031-1036.
53. Watson, A. D., D. G. Edmondson, J. R. Bone, Y. Mukai, Y. Yu, W. Du, D. J. Stillman, and S. Y. Roth. 2000. Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737-2744.
54. Wharton, K. A. J., and S. T. Crews. 1993. CNS midline enhancers of the Drosophila slit and Toll genes. Mech. Dev. 40:141-154.
55. Wu, J., N. Suka, M. Carlson, and M. Grunstein. 2001. TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol. Cell 7:117-126.
56. Zeitlinger, J., R. P. Zinzen, A. Stark, M. Kellis, H. Zhang, R. A. Young, and M. Levine. 2007. Whole-genome ChIP-chip analysis of Dorsal, Twist, and Snail suggests integration of diverse patterning processes in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21:385-390.
57. Zeng, P. Y., C. R. Vakoc, Z. C. Chen, G. A. Blobel, and S. L. Berger. 2006. In vivo dual cross-linking for identification of indirect DNA-associated proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BioTechniques 41:694-698.
58. Zhang, H., and M. Levine. 1999. Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:535-540.