Interaction analysis of dual-interaction CSCL environments

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-12

  Cakir, Murat Perit ^a   Stahl, Gerry ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

INTERACTION ANALYSIS; INTERACTION ENVIRONMENT; MEANING MAKINGS; SHARED UNDERSTANDING; SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 70350409324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1600053.1600055     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Avouris, N., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 147-167.
2. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31-63). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
3. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193. (Pubitemid 127107956)
4. Çakir, M. P. (2009). How online small groups co-construct mathematical artifacts to do collaborative problem solving. Unpublished Dissertation, Ph.D., College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
5. Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 4(2).
6. Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA.
7. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. Weber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Dual-interaction spaces. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning 2005: The next ten years! (Proceedings of CSCL 2005). Taipei, Taiwan: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). Dodrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer-Springer Verlag.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121-151. (Pubitemid 43242266)
11. Dohn, N. B. (2009). Affordances revisited: Articulating a Merleau-Pontian view. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 4(2).
12. Dwyer, N., & Suthers, D. (2006). Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 481-511. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11412-006-9001-1. (Pubitemid 44916438)
13. Fuks, H., Pimentel, M., & Pereira de Lucena, C. (2006). R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 117-142. Retrieved from . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6845-3. (Pubitemid 44084608)
14. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. Mckinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337-366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
15. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
16. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
17. Hanks, W. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In C. Goodwin & A. Duranti (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19. Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and symbolic reasoning in mathematics: Making connections with computers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 59-84.
20. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
21. Jermann, P. (2002). Task and interaction regulation in controlling a traffic simulation. Paper presented at the Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO. Proceedings pp. 601-602.
22. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Planning congruence in dual spaces. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning 2005: The next ten years! (Proceedings of CSCL 2005). Taipei, Taiwan: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2002). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: Study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 169-188.
24. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community: Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 17-22). Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C. (2003). Reconsidering common ground: Examining clark's contribution theory in the operating room. Paper presented at the European Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW '03), Helsinki, Finland. Proceedings pp. 81-98.
26. Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. J. (2001). Dissecting common ground: Examining an instance of reference repair. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 516-521). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Livingston, E. (2006). Ethnomethodological studies of mediated interaction and mundane expertise. The Sociological Review, 54(3).
29. Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning 2005: The next ten years! (Proceedings of CSCL 2005) (pp. 460-469). Taipei, Taiwan: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
32. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Soller, A. (2004). Understanding knowledge sharing breakdowns: A meeting of quantitative and qualitative minds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 212-223. (Pubitemid 39015862)
35. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2003). A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AI-ED 2003, Sydney, Australia. Proceedings pp. 253-260: Amsterdam: IOS Press.
36. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/mit/.
37. Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer. Computer-supported collaborative learning book series, vol 11 Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/vmt/book.
38. Suchman, L. A. (1990). Representing practice in cognitive science. In M. Lynch, Woolgar, S. (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315-337. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11412-006-9660-y. (Pubitemid 44394679)
40. Suthers, D., Connelly, J., Lesgold, A., Paolucci, M., Toth, E., Toth, J., et al. (2001). Representational and advisory guidance for students learning scientific inquiry. In K. D. Forbus & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology (pp. 7-35). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
41. Suthers, D., Girardeau, L., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). Deictic roles of external representations in face-to-face and online collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments, Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003 (pp. 173-182). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Vygotsky, L. (1934/1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Wittgenstein, L. (1944/1956). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203-228. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11412-006-8994-9. (Pubitemid 44084599)
46. Zemel, A., Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., & Feltovich, F. (2008). "What are we missing?" Usability's indexical ground. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 63-85. (Pubitemid 351185640)