Demonstrating professional vision: The work of critique in architectural education

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-171

  Lymer, Gustav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350375364     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749030802590580     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anthony, K. H. (1987). Private reactions to public criticism: Students, faculty, and practicing architects state their views on design juries in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 40, 2-11
2. Büscher, M. (2006). Vision in motion. Environment and Planning, 38, 281-299
3. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633
4. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 15-73
5. Grasseni, C. (2004). Skilled vision: An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics. Social Anthropology, 12, 41-55
6. Greiffenhagen, C. (2008). Video analysis of mathematical practice? Different attempts to "open up" mathematics for sociological investigation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9, Art. 32. Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803323
7. Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855-1878
8. Kawatoko, Y. (2000). Organizing multiple vision. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 37-58
9. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Elsevier Architectural Press
10. Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2008). The dark matter of labwork: Illuminating the negotiation of disciplined perception in mechanics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 180-224
11. Lynch, M. (2006). Cognitive activities without cognition? Ethnomethodological investigations of selected "cognitive" topics. Discourse Studies, 8, 95-104
12. Lynch, M., & Jordan, K. (2000). Patents, promotions, and protocols: Mapping and claiming scientific territory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 124-146
13. Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (1988). Introduction: Sociological orientations to representational practice in science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
14. Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11, 267-278
15. Nemirovsky, R., Cornelia, T., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 119-172
16. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down I'm in the domain state: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physics. In E. Ochs & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 328-369). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
17. Phillabaum, S. (2005). Calibrating photographic vision through multiple semiotic resources. Semiotica, 156, 147-175
18. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., & Aijmer, K. (2002). The expectation marker of course in a cross-linguistic perspective. Languages in Contrast, 4, 13-43
19. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
20. Wilkin, M. (2000). Reviewing the review: An account of a research investigation of the "crit". In D. Nicol & S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism (pp. 100-107). London: Spon Press
21. Zemel, A., Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., & Feltovich, P. (2008). "What are we missing?" Usability's indexical ground. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 63-85