Interpreting three-dimensional structures from two-dimensional images: A web-based interactive 3D teaching model of surgical liver anatomy

HPB

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 523-528

  Crossingham, Jodi L ^a   Jenkinson, Jodie ^b   Woolridge, Nick ^b   Gallinger, Steven ^a   Tait, Gordon A ^a   Moulton, Carol Anne ^a  

^a TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D liver model; Hepatic anatomy; Surgical anatomy; Web based learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HEPATIC ARTERY; HEPATIC VEIN; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERNET; LIVER STRUCTURE; PORTAL VEIN; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 70349527843     PISSN: 1365182X     EISSN: 14772574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00097.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jurgaitis J, Paškonis M, Pivoriunas J, Martinaityte I, Juška A, Jurgitiene R et al. (2008) The comparison of 2-dimensional with 3-dimensional hepatic visualization in the clinical hepatic anatomy education. Medicina 44:428-438.
2. Heylings DJ. (2002) Anatomy 1999-2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ 36:702-710.
3. Marks SC Jr. (2001) Recovering the significance of 3-dimensional data in medical education and clinical practice. Clin Anat 14:90-91.
4. Cook DA. (2007) Where are we with web-based learning in medical education? Med Teach 28:594-598.
5. Granger NA, Calleson DC, Henson OW, Juliano E, Wineski L, McDaniel MD et al. (2006) Use of web-based materials to enhance anatomy instruction in the health sciences. Anat Rec 2898:121-127.
6. Hopkins MA, Nachbar M, Kalet A. (2004) Educational imperatives drive technological advancement in surgery clerkship. Med Educ 38:1186-1187.
7. Yeazel MW, Center BA. (2004) Demonstration of the effectiveness and acceptability of self-study module use in residency education. Med Teach 26:57-62.
8. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. (2006) The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81:207-212.
9. Vernon T, Peckham D. (2002) The benefits of 3D modelling and animation in medical teaching. J Audiov Media Med 25:142-148.
10. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. (2006) Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 244:400-409.
11. Grunwald T, Corsbie-Massay C. (2006) Guidelines for cognitively efficient multimedia learning tools: educational strategies, cognitive load, and interface design. Acad Med 81:213-223.
12. Huang C. (2005) Designing high-quality interactive multimedia learning modules. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29:223-233.
13. Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Payer AF. (2005) Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. Anat Rec 286B:15-20.
14. Goldberg HR, Haase E, Shoukas A, Schramm L. (2006) Redefining classroom instruction. Adv Physiol Educ 30:124-127.
15. Guttmann GD. (2000) Animating functional anatomy for the web. Anat Rec 261:57-63.
16. Adobe.com [Flash Player Penetration]. (2009) San Jose: Adobe Systems, Inc. http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/. [Accessed 10 March 2009.]
17. Sweller J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12:257-285.