The comparison of 2-dimensional with 3-dimensional hepatic visualization in the clinical hepatic anatomy education

Medicina

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 428-438

  Jurgaitis, Jonas ^a   Paškonis, Marius ^a   Pivoriunas, Jonas ^a   Martinaityte, Ieva ^a   Juška, Agnius ^a   Jurgaitiene, Ruta ^b   Samuilis, Arturas ^a   Volf, Ivo ^c   Schöbinger, Maks ^c   Schemmer, Peter ^d   Kraus, Thomas W ^e   Strupas, Kestutis ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Lithuania)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e General Visceral and Minimal Invasive Surgery Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 dimensional visualization; Clinical hepatic anatomy; Computed tomography; Hepatic resection planning; Surgical education

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIVER; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IOHEXOL; LIVER; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SURGERY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 54749099246     PISSN: 1010660X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/medicina44060056     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rutkauskas S, Gedrimas V, Pundzius J, Barauskas G, Basevičius A. Clinical and anatomical basis for the classification of the structural parts of liver. Medicina (Kaunas) 2006;42(2):98-106.
2. Azelis V, Vaicekauskas V, Jurgaitiene R. Širdies ir kraujagysliu, vidaus organu ir nervu sistemu anatomijos modulis. (The anatomic model of cardiovascular, visceral and nervous systems). Kaunas; 2007.
3. Couinaud C. Le Foie: Etudes Anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris, France: Mason; 1957.
4. Marks SC Jr. Recovering the significance of 3-dimensional data in medical education and clinical practice. Clin Anat 2001;14(1):90-1.
5. Lamadé W, Glombitza G, Demiris AM, Cardenas C, Meinzer HP, Richter G, et al. Virtual operation planning in liver surgery. Chirurg 1999;70:239-45.
6. Glombitza G, Lamadé W, Demiris AM, Göpfert MR, Mayer A, Bahner ML, et al. Virtual planning of liver resections: Image processing, visualization and volumetric evaluation. Int J Med Inf.1999;53:225-37.
7. Meinzer HP, Thorn M, Vetter M, Hassenpflug P, Hastenteufel M, Wolf I. Medical imagining: Examples of clinical applications. IDPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 2002;56(5):311-25.
8. Meinzer HP, Thorn M, Cárdenas CE. Computerized planning of liver surgery - an overview. Comput Graph 2002;26:569-576.
9. Lamadé W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, Chiu P, Cárdenas CE, Thorn M, et al. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 2000;135: 1256-61.
10. Jurgaitis J, Paskonis M, Samuilis A, Volf I, Schobinger M, Brimas G, et al. Trimatės kompiuterinės vizualizacijos taikymas kepenu chirurgijoje. (Three-dimensional visualization: Applications in liver surgery.) Lithuanian Surgery 2006;4(4):283-91.
11. Wald C, Bourquain H. Role of new three-dimensional image analysis techniques in planning of live donor liver transplantation, liver resection and intervention. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(2):161-5.
12. Jurgaitis J, Paskonis M, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Gragert S, Hinz U, et al. Controlled-surgical education in clinical liver transplantation is not associated with increased patient risk. Clin Transplant 2006;20(Suppl 17):69-74.
13. Meinzer HP, Schemmer P, Schobinger M, Nolden M, Heiman T, Yelcin B, et al. Computer based surgery planning for living liver donation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 34, Part 30. 2004. p. 291-295.
14. Terminology committee of the IHPBA. Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 2000;2(3):333-9.
15. Lunevičius R. Terminai kepenu anatomijai ir rezekcijoms apibūdinti: Brisbane 2000 metu sistema būtina naudotis ir Lietuvoje. (Terminology for definition of liver anatomy and resections: it is essential to use Brisbane 2000 system in Lithuania.) Lithuanian Surgery 2007;5(2):108-18.
16. Healey JE Jr, Schroy PC. Anatomy of the biliary ducts within the human liver. Analysis of the prevailing pattern of branchings and the major variations of the biliary ducts. Arch Surg 1953;66:599-616.
17. Fischer L. Thorn M, Neumann JO, Schobinger M, Heimann T, Grenacher L, et al. The segments of the hepatic veins - is there a spatial correlation to the Couinaud liver segments? Eur J Radiol 2005;53(2):245-55.
18. Marescaux J, Clement J-M, Tassetti V, Mutter D, Cotin S, Ayache N. Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: The next revolution. Ann Surg 1998;228(5):627-37.
19. Van Leeuwn MS, Fernandez MA, van Es HW, Stokking R, Dillon EH, Feldberg MA. Variations in venous and segmental anatomy of the liver: Two- and three-dimensional MR imagining in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:1337-45.
20. Silverstein JC, Dech F, Edison M, Jurek P, Hleton WS, Espat NJ. Virtual reality: Immersive hepatic surgery educational environment. Surgery 2002;132:274-7.
21. Hemming AR, Reed A, Lanhgam MR, Fujita S, Willem J, Howard RJ. Hepatic vein reconstruction for resection of hepatic tumors. Ann Surg 2002;235(6):850-8.
22. Schlusselberg DS, Smith WK, Woodward DJ, Parkey RW. Use of computed tomography for a 3-dimensional treatment planning system. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1998;12:25-32.
23. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Bliss DF, Woodhouse CE, Fishman EK. Surgical segmental anatomy of the liver: Demonstration with spiral CT during arterial portography and multiplanar reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:99-103.
24. Schiano TD, Bodian C, Schwartz ME, Glajchen N, Min AD. Accuracy and significance of computed tomographic scan assessment of hepatic volume in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Transplantation 2000;69:545-50.
25. Lang H, Radtke A, Liu C, Frhauf NR, Peitgen HO, Brolsch ChE. Extended left hepatectomy - modified operation planning based on three-dimensional visualization of liver anatomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:306-10.
26. Hermoey L, Laamari-Azjal I, Cao Z, Annet L, Lerut J, Dawant BM, et al. Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: Comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods. Radiology 2005;234:171-8.
27. Neumann JO, Thorn M, Fischer L, Schobinger M, Heimann T, Radeleff B, et al. Branching patterns and drainage territories of the middle hepatic vein in computer-simulated right living-donor hepatectomies. Am J Transplant 2006;6: 1407-15.
28. Frericks BB, Caldarone FC, Nashan B, Savellano DH, Stamm G, Kirchhoff TD, et al. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 2004;14:326-33.
29. Vernon T, Peckham D. The benefits of 3D modelling and animation in medical teaching. J Audiov Media Med 2002; 25(4):142-8.
30. Bogetti JD, Herts RB, Sands MJ, Carroll JF, Vogt DP, Henderson M. Accuracy and utility of 3-dimensional computed tomography in evaluation of donors for adult related liver transplants. Liver Transpl 2001;7(8):687-92.
31. de Barros N, Rodrigues CJ, Rodrigues AJ JR, de Negri Germano MA, Cerri GG. The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 2001; 14(1):36-41.
32. Laeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Bachalier P, Lemarque P, Weber JC, Nakano H, et al. Hepatic metastases of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Safe hepatic surgery. World J Surg 2004;25:689-92.