Linking local e-government development stages to collaboration strategy

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 36-56

  Kim, Hyun Joon ^a   Lee, Jooho ^b   Kim, Soonhee ^c,d  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Campbell Institute of Public Affairs

Author keywords

Collaborative work; Electronic government; Stage theory

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT; COLLABORATIVE WORK; DEVELOPMENT STAGES; DISTRICT GOVERNMENT; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; LOCAL E GOVERNMENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS; RESOURCE DEPENDENCES;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 47649116675     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2008070103     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen, B., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2005). E-government as collaborative governance: Structural, accountability and cultural reform. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Practicing e-government: A global perspective (pp. 1-15). New York: Idea Group Publishing.
2. Anderson, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236-248.
3. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (2001). Powering up: How public managers can take control of information technology. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
5. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386.
6. Bugler, D. T., & Bretschneider, S. (1993). Technology push or program pull: Interest in new information technologies within public organizations. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public management: The state of the art (pp. 275-293). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Charih, M., & Robert, J. (2004). Government on-line in the federal government of Canada: The organizational issues. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 373-384.
8. Chen, Y.-C., & Perry, J. L. (2003). IT outsourcing: A primer for public managers. Washington, D.C: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
9. Craig, A., & Schriar, S. (2001.). The find-it! Illinois controlled vocabulary: Improving access to government information through the Jessica subject tree. Government Information Quarterly, 18(3), 195-208.
10. Center for Technology in Government. (2004). New models of collaboration: An overview. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/new_models_exec/ new_models_exec.pdf
11. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
12. GSA. (2002). Government without boundaries: A management approach to inter-governmental programs. Washington, D.C: Office of Intergovernmental Solutions.
13. Hiller, J., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government: The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
14. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-441.
15. Holden, S. H., Norris, D., & Fletcher, P. (2003). Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 325-344.
16. Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Governments at work: Best practice and model programs. London: Sage.
17. Holzer, M., & Kim, S.T. (2005). Digital governance in municipalities worldwide (2005): UN/ASPA.
18. Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage Publications, Inc.
19. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159-1166.
20. IdeA, & Socitm. (2002). Local e-government now: A worldwide view. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.locregis.net/aaa/LEGNUK.PDF
21. Intelligence Community Forum. (2006). The top seven intelligent communities of 2006. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http://www.intelligent-community. org/associations/5315/files/ TopSevenIC-2006.pdf
22. Kraemer, K. L., King, J. L., Dunkle, D. E., & Lane., J. P. (1989). Managing information systems: Change and control in organizational computing (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
23. Landsbergen, D., & Wolken, G. (1998). Eliminating legal and policy barriers to interoperable government systems.
24. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: Afour stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122-136.
25. Linden, R. M. (2002). Working across boundaries: Making collaboration work in government and non-profit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Mattessich, P. W., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. R. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work (2 ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
27. McDaniel, E.A. (2003). Facilitating cross-boundary leadership in emerging e-government leaders. Paper presented at the Informing Science + IT Education Conference, Fori, Finland.
28. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
29. NASCIO. (2005). Connectingthe silos: Using governance models to achieve data integration. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from www.nscio.org
30. Norris, D., Holden, S. H., & Fletcher, P. D. (2001). E-government: Web sites and web access. Washington, D.C: International City/County Management Association.
31. Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003). Checklist for e-government leaders. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.oecd.org/publicationsiPol_brief
32. Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. Cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51-64.
33. Reddick, C. G., & Frank, H. A. (2006). The perceived impacts of e-government on U.S. Cities: A survey of Florida and Texas city managers. Government Information Quarterly, Corrected Proof 23(2), 249-266.
34. Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Develop long-term competitiveness through it assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31-43.
35. Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. Boston, M.A: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Special Committee for E-government. (2003). Korea's e-government: Completion of e-government framework: Special Committee for E-government, Republic of Korea.
37. Stake, R. E. (2000). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. United Nations and American Society for Public Administration (2002), Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective, UN/ASPA, New York, NY.
39. Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic planning for information systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
40. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.
41. Wood, D., & Gray., B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 139-162.