Citizen demand for interactive e-government: The case of Georgia Consumer Services

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 288-300

  Streib, Gregory ^a   Navarro, Ignacio ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer protection; e government; Government service delivery; Public administration; Public management

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746671851     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074005283371     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bimber, B. (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, 17 (3). 329-333.
2. Clift, S. (2002). The future of e-democracy: The 50-year plan. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from http://www.publicus.net/articles/future.html
3. Council for Excellence in Government. (2001). E-government: The next American revolution. Retrieved October 2, 2005. Available from www.excelgov.org
4. Eggers, W. D. (2004). Adoption dilemma. Public CIO Magazine. Retrieved October 2, 2005. Available from http://www.public-cio.com/
5. Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. New York: Times Books.
6. Harlin, K. (2004, March 14). Despite advances, the basics are still banks'bottom line: Customers have embraced some services, such as Internet banking, but technology isn't everything. The Times Union, p. 40-40.
7. Holden, S. H., Norris D. F., & Fletcher P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26 (4). 325-344.
8. Koprowski, G. (1995, November 9). The new digital democracy. Washington Technology, p. 1-1.
9. Markle Foundation. (2001). Toward a framework for Internet accountability. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from http://www.markle.org/news/AccountabilityForewordExecutive&Intro.pdf
10. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62 (4). 424-433.
11. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/anationonline2.pdf
12. Norris, D. F., & Demeter, L. (1999). Information technology and city government. The Municipal Yearbook. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
13. Potts, C. E. (2003). Why small banks have failed to reap full benefits of Web. American Banker, 168 (210). 10-10.
14. Raney, R. (2000, May 11). Study finds Internet of social benefit to users. The New York Times p. 7-7.
15. Stanford, D. D. (2004, January 1). Budget cuts bring long lines back to license centers. The Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. 1-1.
16. Stowers, G. (1999). Becoming cyberactive: State and local governments on the World Wide Web. Government Information, 16 (2). 111-127.
17. Taft, D. K. (2001). Raising the e-government banner. Computer Reseller News, 937, 32-32. Retrieved October 2, 2005. Available from http://www.crn.com/
18. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13 (1). 83-102.
19. Tillett, S. L. (2000). E-governments on the rise: In more municipalities, citizens go online instead of standing in line. Internet Week, 818, 24-24.
20. Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Trust, civic engagement, and the Internet. Political Communication, 21 (2). 223-242.
21. Verton, D. (2000). Electronic government. Computerworld, 34, 50-50.
22. Weare, C., Musso, J. A., & Hale, M. (1999). Electronic democracy and the diffusion of municipal web pages in California. Administration & Society, 31, 3-27.
23. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64 (1). 15-27.