Minimally Invasive Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 537-563

  Biasca, Nicola ^a   Schneider, Thomas Oliver ^b   Bungartz, Matthias ^a  

^a Clinics of Orthopedic Surgery Sports Medicine and Trauma Surgery   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Orthopaedics   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer assisted navigated surgery; Malalignment; Malrotation; Minimally invasive surgery; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTHROTOMY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE RESECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMORAL NERVE; HUMAN; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NERVE BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SCIATIC NERVE; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND CLOSURE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349169191     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.06.007     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Callaghan J.J., O'Rourke M.R., Iossi M.F., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A concise follow-up at a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1995-1998
2. Gill G.S., and Joshi A.B. Long-term results of kinematic condylar knee replacement: an analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 335-358
3. Pavone V., Boettner F., Fickert S., et al. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 (2001) 18-25
4. Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Meding J.B., et al. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 (2001) 51-57
5. Rodrigues J.A., Bhende H., and Ranawat C.S. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 (2001) 10-17
6. Insall J.N., Binazzi R., Soudry M., et al. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192 (1985) 13-22
7. Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., et al. Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403 (2002) 143-152
8. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 (2001) 46-55
9. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 830-835
10. Miller M.C., Berger R.A., Petrella A.J., et al. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 (2001) 38-45
11. Nagamine R., White S.E., McCarthy D.S., et al. Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10 (1995) 265-270
12. Romero J., Duronio J.F., Sohrabi A., et al. Varus and valgus flexion laxity of total knee alignment methods in loaded cadaveric knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394 (2002) 243-253
13. Figgie H.E., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., et al. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68 (1986) 1035-1040
14. Piazza S.J., Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., et al. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 16 (1998) 264-270
15. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299 (1994) 153-156
16. Catani F., Leardini A., Ensini A., et al. The stability of cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 19 6 (2004) 775-782
17. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., and Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 (1991) 709-714
18. Rand J.A., and Coventry M.B. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232 (1988) 168-173
19. Matziolis G., Krocher D., Weiss U., et al. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 236-243
20. Lotke P.A., and Ecker M.L. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59 (1977) 77-79
21. Nabeyama R., Matsuda S., Miura H., et al. The accuracy of image-guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 366-371
22. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., et al. Insall Award paper: why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 (2002) 7-13
23. Stulberg S., Loan P., and Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 (2002) 90-98
24. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 3 (2004) 372-377
25. Stöckl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., et al. Navigation improved accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 (2004) 180-186
26. Bäthis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 682-687
27. Martin A., Wohlgenannt O., Prenn M., et al. Imageless navigation for TKA increased implant accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460 (2007) 178-184
28. Ensini A., Catani F., Leardini A., et al. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457 (2007) 156-162
29. Mielke R.K., Clemens U., Jens J.H., et al. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation: preliminary experience and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139 (2001) 109-116
30. Jenny J.Y., and Boeri C. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprosthesis: a comparative study with conventional instruments. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139 (2001) 117-119
31. Bonutti P.M., Mont M.A., McMahon M., et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 26-32
32. Repicci J.A. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int 11 (2003) 282-286
33. Dalury D.F., and Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 77-81
34. Insall J.N. Choices and compromises in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226 (1988) 43-48
35. Tria A.J., and Coon T.M. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416 (2003) 185-190
36. Laskin R.S. New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416 (2003) 151-153
37. Bonutti P.M., Neal D.J., and Kestler M.A. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics 26 (2003) 899-903
38. Daubresse F., Vajeu C., and Loquet J. Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 71 (2005) 710-713
39. King J., Stamper D.L., Schaad D.C., et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty: assessment of the learning curve and the post-operative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 1497-1503
40. Laskin R.S. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 54-59
41. Boerger T.O., Aglietti P., Mondanelli N., et al. Mini-subvastus versus parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 82-87
42. Karpman R.R., and Smith H.L. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 24 5 (2008) 681-688
43. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., and Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24 4 (2008) 560-569
44. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24 4 (2008) 570-578
45. Scuderi G.R., Tenholder M., and Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 61-67
46. Hofmann A.A., Plaster R.L., and Murdock L.E. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269 (1991) 70-77
47. Engh G.A., Holt B.T., and Parks N.L. A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for the total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 322-331
48. Seyler T.M., Bonutti P.M., Slif D.U., et al. Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 7 Suppl 3 (2007) 21-26
49. Labat G. Regional anesthesia: Its technique and clinical applications: regional anesthesia. 2nd edition (1924), W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia p. 45-55
50. Winnie A.P., Ramamurthy S., and Durrani Z. The inguinal paravascular technique of lumbar plexus anesthesia: the '3-in-1 block'. Anesth Analg 52 (1973) 989-996
51. Beck G.P. Anterior approach to sciatic nerve block. Anesthesiology 24 (1963) 222-224
52. Pham Dang C. Midfemoral block: a new lateral approach to the sciatic nerve. Anesth Analg 88 (1999) 1426
53. Meier G. Der kontinuierliche anteriore Ischidicuskatheter (KAI). In: Mehrkens HH, Büttner J (Hrsg). Kontinuerliche periphere Leitungsblockade. Acris Verlag, München, 1999:47-8 [in German].
54. Meier G. Der distale Ischiadicuskatheter (DIK). In: Mehrkens HH, Büttner J (Hrsg). Kontinuerliche periphere Leitungsblockade. Acris Verlag, München, 1999:43-6 [in German].
55. Dalury D.F. Observations of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 389 (2001) 150-155
56. Eckhoff D.G., Metzger R.G., and Vandewalle M.V. Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 3211 (1995) 28-31
57. Biasca N., Wirth S., and Bungartz M. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MISTKA). Knee 16 1 (2009) 22-29
58. Ranawat C.S., Insall J., and Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120 (1976) 76-82
59. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 13-14
60. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 618-626
61. Ewald F.C. The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 9-12
62. Yoo J.H., Chang C.B., Shin K.S., et al. Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty 23 4 (2008) 586-592
63. Berger R.A., Rubash H.E., Seel M.J., et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286 (1993) 40-47
64. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 261-269
65. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22 8 (2007) 1097-1106
66. Jenny J.Y., Clemens U., Kohler S., et al. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system. J Arthroplasty 20 7 (2005) 832-839
67. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., et al. Computer-assisted navigation increased precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 (2005) 152-159
68. Molfetta L., and Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15 (2008) 75-79
69. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20 3 (2005) 282-288
70. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., and Yoon S.H. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 4 (2007) 471-476
71. Malik M.H., Wadia F., and Porter M.L. Preliminary radiological evaluation of the Vector Vision CT-free knee module for implantation of the LCS knee prosthesis. Knee 14 1 (2007) 19-21
72. Siston R.A., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., et al. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 2276-2280
73. Catani F., Biasca N., Ensini A., et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008) 765-771
74. Hart R., Janecek M., Chaker A., et al. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27 (2003) 366-369
75. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Wurstlin S., et al. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional versus navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Unfallchirurg 106 (2003) 941-948
76. Olcott C.W., and Scott R.D. The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 (1999) 39-42
77. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative ct assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 818-823
78. Siston R.A., Giori N.J., Goodman S.B., et al. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. J Biomech 40 (2007) 728-735
79. Catani F., Biasca N., Ensini A., et al. Tibial and femoral joint line restoration after navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) [in review]
80. Van Damme G., Defoort K., Ducoulombier Y., et al. What should the surgeon aim for when performing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 Suppl 2 (2005) 52-58
81. Tokuhara Y., Kadoya Y., Nakagawa S., et al. The flexion gap in normal knees: an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 1133-1136
82. Todo S., Kadoya Y., Moilanen T., et al. Anteroposterior and rotational movement of the femur during knee flexion. Clin Orthop 362 (1999) 162-170
83. Hill P.F., Vedi V., Williams A., et al. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 1196-1198
84. Iwaki H., Pinskerova V., and Freeman M.A.R. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movement of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 1189-1195
85. Nakagawa S., Kadoya Y., Todo S., et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 1199-1200
86. Moore T.H., and Meyer M.H. Apparatus to position knees for varus-valgus stress roentgenograms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59 (1977) 984
87. Takahashi T., Wada Y., and Yamamoto H. Soft tissue balancing with pressure distribution during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 235-239
88. Stahelin T., Kessler O., Pfirmann C., et al. Fluoroscopy assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 513-515
89. Oliver J.H., and Coughlin L.P. Objective knee evaluation using the Genucum knee analysis system: clinical implications. Am J Sports Med 15 (1987) 571-578
90. Wirth S, Biasca N. Joint laxity in navigated total knee arthroplasty. Presented at the 2006 Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 5th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Helsinki, Finland, June 19-22, 2005.
91. Stulberg S.D., Yafffe M.A., and Koo S.S. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 4 Supp (2006) 47-54
92. Haas S.B., Cook S., and Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 68-73
93. Haas S.B., Manitta M.A., and Burdick P. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452 (2006) 112-116
94. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright R.J., et al. Validity and responsiveness of the knee society clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 12 (2001) 1856-1864