Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: A computer simulation study

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 264-270

  Piazza, S J ^a   Delp, S L ^a   Stulberg, S D ^a   Stern, S H ^a  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINTS (ANATOMY);

POSTERIOR CRUCIATE RETAINING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; POSTERIOR TILTING; TIBIAL COMPONENT;

SURGERY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT STABILITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA;

EID: 0032029572     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160214     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1 Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR: The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten‐year‐minimum follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77: 1713–1720, 1995
2. 2 Delp SL, Kocmond JH, Stern SH: Tradeoffs between motion and stability in posterior substituting knee arthroplasty design. J Biomech 28: 1155–1166, 1995
3. 3 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM: In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop 331. 107–117, 1996
4. 4 Dorr LD, Boiardo RA: Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205: 5–11, 1986
5. 5 Draganich LF, Andriacchi TP, Andersson GBJ: Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism. J Orthop Res 5: 539–547, 1987
6. 6 Farin GE: Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design: A Practical Guide. Boston, Academic Press, 1988
7. 7 Garg A, Walker PS: Prediction of total knee motion using a three‐dimensional computer‐graphics model. J Biomech 23: 45–58. 1990
8. 8 Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RWB: Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269: 63–69, 1991
9. 9 Krackow KA: Surgical principles in total knee arthroplasty: alignment, deformity, approaches, and bone cuts. In: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction, pp 269–276. Ed by JJ Callaghan, DA Dennis, WG Paprosky, and AG Rosenberg. Rosemont, Illinois, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995
10. 10 Laskin RS, Rieger MA: The surgical technique for performing a total knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 20: 31–48, 1989
11. 11 Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT: Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, pp 379–392. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988
12. 12 Rand JA: Modularity in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 62 (Suppl 1): 180–186, 1996
13. 13 Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr.: Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 321: 106–110, 1995
14. 14 Townley CD: The anatomic total knee: instrumentation and alignment technique. In: The Knee: Papers of the First Scientific Meeting of the Knee Society, pp 39–54. Ed by LD Dorr Baltimore, University Park Press, 1985
15. 15 Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosnberg AG: Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299: 31–43, 1994
16. 16 Whiteside LA, Amador DD: The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoctotal knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 3 (Suppl): S51–S57, 1988