Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty: Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1497-1503

  King, Jason ^a   Stamper, Daniel L ^a   Schaad, Douglas C ^a   Leopold, Seth S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DEVICE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING;

EID: 34447279028     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00867     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963-74.
2. Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:831-40.
3. Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):71-3.
4. Walton NP, Jahromi I, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Lewis PL, Campbell DG. Arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement; does therapeutic warfarin make a difference? Knee. 2005;12:103-6.
5. Berger RA, Sanders S, Gerlinger T, Della Valle C, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):33-8.
6. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86 Suppl 2:26-32.
7. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:68-73.
8. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:54-9.
9. Stulberg SD. Minimally invasive navigated knee surgery: an American perspective. Orthopedics. 2005;28(10 Suppl):s1241-6.
10. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:185-90.
11. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77-81.
12. Tanavalee A, Thiengwittayaporn S, Itiravivong P. Results of the 136 consecutive minimally invasive total knee arthroplasties. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88 Suppl 4:S74-8.
13. Benjamin J, Chilvers M. Correcting lateral patellar tilt at the time of total knee arthroplasty can result in overuse of lateral release. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21 (6 Suppl 2):121-6.
14. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:106-11.
15. Holt G, Wheelan K, Gregori A. The ethical implications of recent innovations in knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:226-9.
16. Barrack RL, Wolfe MW. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:75-82.
17. Kocher MS, Zurakowski D. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:607-20.
18. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Evidence-based medicine for orthopedic surgeons. J Knee Surg. 2005;18:57-63.
19. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Dunn W, Matthews CE, Harrell FE Jr, Dittus RS. Reading and reviewing the orthopaedic literature: a systematic, evidence-based medicine approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:220-9.