Does Cognitive Science Need Kernels?

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 381-388

  Jäkel, Frank ^a   Schölkopf, Bernhard ^b   Wichmann, Felix A ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL DATA; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LEVEL; DATA ANALYSIS; KERNEL METHODS; MACHINE-LEARNING; THEORETICAL RESULT;

PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS;

MACHINE TOOLS;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CALCULATION; COGNITION; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KERNEL METHOD; LEARNING ALGORITHM; PERCEPTRON; PSYCHOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; PERCEPTION;

EID: 69949111927     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Sutton R.S., and Barto A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998), MIT Press
2. Bishop C.M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (1995), Oxford University Press
3. Hinton G.E., et al. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18 (2006) 1527-1554
4. In: Schölkopf B., et al. (Ed). Kernel Methods in Computational Biology (2004), MIT Press
5. Marlin, B. (2004) Collaborative filtering: A machine learning perspective. Master's thesis, University of Toronto
6. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65 (1958) 386-408
7. In: Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Parallel Distributed Processing (1986), MIT Press
8. Marr D. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information (1982), W. H. Freeman
9. Lee M.D. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15 (2008) 1-15
10. Chater N., et al. Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 287-291
11. Jäkel F., et al. A tutorial on kernel methods for categorization. J. Math. Psychol. 51 (2007) 343-358
12. Hofmann T., et al. Kernel methods in machine learning. Ann. Stat. 36 (2008) 1171-1220
13. Schölkopf B., and Smola A. Learning with Kernels (2002), MIT Press
14. Medin D.L., and Schaffer M.M. Context theory of classification learning. Psychol. Rev. 85 (1978) 207-238
15. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115 (1986) 39-57
16. Nilsson N.J. Learning Machines (1965), McGraw-Hill
17. Minsky, M. and Papert, S. (1967) Linearly unrecognizable patterns. A. I. Memo No. 140, MIT
18. Kruschke J.K. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychol. Rev. 99 (1992) 22-44
19. Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition. In: Ashby F.G. (Ed). Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition (1992), Erlbaum 363-393
20. Jäkel F., et al. Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: Insights from machine learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15 (2008) 256-271
21. Jäkel F., et al. Similarity, kernels and the triangle inequality. J. Math. Psychol. 52 (2008) 297-303
22. Love B.C., et al. SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. Psychol. Rev. 111 (2004) 309-332
23. Poggio T., and Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343 (1990) 263-266
24. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 60-64
25. Poggio, T. and Girosi, F. (1989) A theory of networks for approximation and learning. A. I. Memo No. 1140, MIT
26. Poggio, T. (1990) A theory of how the brain might work. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. LV:899-910
27. Poggio T., and Bizzi E. Generalization in vision and motor control. Nature 431 (2004) 768-774
28. Schyns P.G., et al. The development of features in object concepts. Behav. Brain Sci. 21 (1998) 1-17
29. Wichmann F.A., et al. Machine learning applied to perception: decision-images for gender classification. In: Saul L.K., et al. (Ed). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17 (2005), MIT Press 1489-1496
30. Kienzle W., et al. A nonparametric approach to bottom-up visual saliency. In: Schölkopf B., et al. (Ed). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (2007), MIT Press 689-696
31. Kienzle, W. et al.. Center-surround patterns emerge as optimal predictors for human saccade targets. J. Vis., 9, 1-15
32. Yovel Y., et al. Plant classification from bat-like echolocation signals. PLoS Comput. Biol (2008) doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000032
33. Gosselin F., and Schyns P.G. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vis. Res 41 (2001) 2261-2271
34. Dupuis-Roy N., et al. Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. J. Vision 9 (2009) 1-8
35. Ahumada A.J., and Lovell J. Stimulus features in signal detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 (1971) 1751-1756
36. Abbey C.K., and Eckstein M.P. Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer. J. Vision 6 (2006) 335-355
37. Marmarelis P.Z., and Marmarelis V.Z. Analysis of physiological systems: The white-noise approach (1978), Plenum Press
38. Neri P., and Levi D.M. Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint. Vision Res. 46 (2006) 2465-2474
39. Gigerenzer G. From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychol. Rev. 98 (1991) 254-267
40. Palmeri T.J., et al. Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 286-290
41. Palmeri T.J., and Gauthier I. Visual object understanding. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 291-303
42. Ashby F.G., and Alfonso-Reese L.A. Categorization as probability density estimation. J. Math. Psychol. 39 (1995) 216-233
43. Palmeri T.J. The time course of perceptual categorization. In: Hahn U., and Ramscar M. (Eds). Similarity and Categorization (2001), Oxford University Press 193-224
44. Murphy G.L. The Big Book of Concepts (2002), MIT Press
45. Heit E. Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20 (1994) 1264-1282
46. Lamberts K. Flexible tuning of similarity in exemplar-based categorization. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 20 (1994) 1003-1021
47. Nosofsky R.M., and Johansen M.K. Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7 (2000) 375-402
48. Rodrigues P.M., and Murre J.M.J. Rules-plus-exception tasks: A problem for exemplar models?. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14 (2007) 640-646
49. Ashby F.G., et al. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 442-481
50. Erickson M.A., and Kruschke J.K. Rules and exemplars in category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127 (1998) 107-140
51. Denton S.E., et al. Rule-based extrapolation: A continuing challenge for exemplar models. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15 (2008) 780-786
52. Smith J.D., and Minda J.P. Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24 (1998) 1411-1436
53. Smith J.D., and Minda J.P. Thirty categorization results in search of a model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26 (2000) 3-27
54. Nosofsky R.M., and Zaki S.R. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28 (2002) 924-940
55. Navarro D.J. On the interaction between exemplar-based concepts and a response scaling process. J. Math. Psychol. 51 (2007) 85-98
56. Edelman S. Representation is representation of similarities. Behav. Brain Sci. 21 (1998) 449-498
57. Rosseel Y. Mixture models of categorization. J. Math. Psychol. 46 (2002) 178-210
58. Vanpaemel W., and Storms G. In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15 (2008) 732-749
59. De Schryver M., et al. How many exemplars are used? Explorations with the Rex Leopold I model. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16 (2009) 337-343
60. Logothetis N.K., et al. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 552-563
61. Sigala N., and Logothetis N.K. Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature 415 (2002) 318-320
62. Op de Beeck H., et al. Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 1244-1252
63. Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (2000), Springer
64. Devroye L., et al. A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition (1996), Springer
65. Briscoe E. and Feldman J., (2006) Conceptual complexity and the bias-variance tradeoff. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Sun R. et al., eds), Earlbaum, 1038-1043
66. Bousquet O., and Elisseeff A. Stability and generalization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2 (2002) 499-526
67. Poggio T., et al. General conditions for predictivity in learning theory. Nature 428 (2004) 419-422
68. Guyon I., and Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (2003) 1157-1182
69. Bousquet O. and Herrmann D., (2003) On the complexity of learning the kernel matrix. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (Becker S. et al., eds), MIT Press, 415-422
70. Lanckriet G.R.G., et al. Learning the kernel matrix with semidefinite programming. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5 (2004) 27-72
71. Weston J., et al. Use of the zero-norm with linear models and kernel methods. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (2003) 1439-1461
72. Hastie T., et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (2009), Springer
73. Candes E.J., and Wakin M.B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 25 (2008) 21-30
74. Franz M.O., and Schölkopf B. A unifying view of Wiener and Volterra theory and polynomial kernel regression. Neural Comput. 18 (2006) 3097-3118
75. Haussler, D. (1999) Convolution kernels on discrete structures. UCSC-CRL-99-10, Department of Computer Science, University of California at Santa Cruz
76. Smale, S. et al. (2008) Mathematics of the neural response. CSAIL Technical Report, MIT, 2008-70
77. In: Chapelle O., et al. (Ed). Semi-Supervised Learning (2006), MIT Press
78. Zhu X., et al. Humans perform semi-supervised classification too. In: Holte R.C., and Howe A. (Eds). Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2007), AAAI Press 864-870
79. Vandist K., et al. Semisupervised category learning: the impact of feedback in learning the information-integration task. Attent., Percept. Psychophys. 71 (2009) 328-341
80. Andrews S., et al. Support vector machines for multiple-instance learning. In: Becker S. (Ed). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (2003), MIT Press 561-568