Rule-based extrapolation: A continuing challenge for exemplar models

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 780-786

  Denton, Stephen E ^a   Kruschke, John K ^a   Erickson, Michael A ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 50949127230     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.780     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ASHBY, F. G., ALFONSO-REESE, L. A., TURKEN, A. U., & WALDRON, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
2. ERICKSON, M. A. (1999). Rule and exemplar representation in category learning (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 2377B.
3. ERICKSON, M. A. (2008). Executive attention and task switching in category learning: Evidence for stimulus-dependent representation. Memory & Cognition, 36, 749-761.
4. ERICKSON, M. A., & KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
5. ERICKSON, M. A., & KRUSCHKE, J. K. (2002). Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 160-168.
6. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
7. LEWANDOWSKY, S., KALISH, M., & GRIFFITHS, T. L. (2000). Competing strategies in categorization: Expediency and resistance to knowledge restructuring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1666-1684.
8. MEDIN, D. L., & SCHAFFER, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
9. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
10. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & JOHANSEN, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375-402.
11. RODRIGUES, P. M., & MURRE, J. M. J. (2007). Rules-plus-exception tasks: A problem for exemplar models? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 640-646.
12. WEBB, M. R., & LEE, M. D. (2004). Modeling individual differences in category learning. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1440-1445). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. YANG, L.-X., & LEWANDOWSKY, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 663-679.