Thirty Categorization Results in Search of a Model

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-27

  Smith, J David ^a,b   Minda, John Paul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; REVIEW;

CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 0033628234     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 33-53.
2. Hartley, J., & Homa, D. (1981). Abstraction of stylistic concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 7, 33-46.
3. Homa, D. (1984). On the nature of categories. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 18, 49-94.
4. Homa, D., & Chambliss, D. (1975). The relative contributions of common and distinctive information on the abstraction from ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 351-359.
5. Homa, D., Rhoads, D., & Chambliss, D. (1979). Evolution of conceptual structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 11-23.
6. Homa, D., Sterling, S., & Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 418-439.
7. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
8. Lamberts, K. (1994). Flexible tuning of similarity in exemplar-based categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1003-1021.
9. Lamberts, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161-180.
10. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
11. McKinley, S. C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 128-148.
12. McKinley, S. C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1996). Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 294-317.
13. Medin, D. L. (1975). A theory of context in discrimination learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 269-315). New York: Academic Press.
14. Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 333-352.
15. Medin, D. L., Dewey, G. I., & Murphy, T. D. (1983). Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 607-625.
16. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
17. Medin, D. L., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1981). Linear separability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355-368.
18. Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241-253.
19. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-115.
20. Minda, J. P., & Smith, J. D. (1999). Prototypes in category learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104-114.
22. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
23. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87-108.
24. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54-65.
25. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
26. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 149-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., & McKinley, S. C. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 211-233.
28. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. K. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
29. Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 548-568.
30. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
31. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
32. Reed, S. K. (1978). Category vs. item learning: Implications for categorization models. Memory & Cognition, 6, 612-621.
33. Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111-144). New York: Academic Press.
34. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 192-238.
35. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
36. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1411-1430.
37. Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J., & Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 659-680.