SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 332, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 832-847

  Ropiquet, Anne ^a,b   Li, Blaise ^a   Hassanin, Alexandre ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Branch support; Phylogeny; Reliability; Reproducibility; Supermatrix; Supertree; Topological conflicts

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BOOTSTRAPPING; DATA SET; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOINFORMATICS; BOOTSTRAPPING; BOVIDS; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTROGRESSION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DECISION TREES; DNA; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MITOCHONDRIA; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

BOVIDAE; MAMMALIA; RUMINANTIA;

EID: 69949086572     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Murphy W.J., Eizirik E., O'Brien S.J., Madsen O., Scally M., Douady C.J., Teeling E., Ryder O.A., Stanhope M.J., de Jong W.W., and Springer M.S. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294 (2001) 2348-2351
2. Murphy W.J., Elzirik E., Johnson W.E., Zhang Y.P., Ryder O.A., and O'Brien S.J. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409 (2001) 614-618
3. Driskell A.C., Ané C., Burleigh J.G., McMahon M., O'meara B.C., and Sanderson M.J. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306 (2004) 1172-1174
4. Rannala B., Huelsenbeck J.P., Yang Z., and Nielsen R. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 702-710
5. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., and Carroll S.B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425 (2003) 798-804
6. de Queiroz A., and Gatesy J. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 (2007) 34-41
7. Bininda-Emond O.R.P. Trees versus characters and the supertree/supermatrix "paradox". Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 356-359
8. Pisani D., and Wilkinson M. Matrix representation with parsimony, taxonomic congruence, and total evidence. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 151-155
9. Philip G.K., Creevey C.J., and McInerney J.O. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1175-1184
10. Wilkinson M., Pisani D., Cotton J.A., and Corfe I. Measuring support and finding unsupported relationships in supertrees. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 823-831
11. Burleigh J.G., Driskell A.C., and Sanderson M.J. Supertree bootstrapping methods for assessing phylogenetic variation among genes in genome-scale data sets. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 426-440
12. Baum B.R. Combining trees as a way of combining datasets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41 (1992) 3-10
13. Ragan M.A. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1 (1992) 53-58
14. Ronquist F. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting. Syst. Biol. 45 (1996) 247-253
15. Moore B.R., Smith S.A., and Donoghue M.J. Increasing data transparency and estimating phylogenetic uncertainty in supertrees: Approaches using nonparametric bootstrapping. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 662-676
16. In: Wilson D.E., and Reeder D.M. (Eds). Mammal Species of the World (2005), Johns Hopkins University Press
17. Rambaut A. Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor (1996). http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk
18. D.L. Swofford, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1, Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, 1993
19. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F. MrBayes inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
20. J.A.A. Nylander, MrModeltest 2.2 (Program distributed by the author), Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 2004
21. Guindon S., and Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 696-704
22. Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4 (2003), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
23. Hassanin A., Lecointre G., and Tillier S. The 'evolutionary signal' of homoplasy in protein-coding gene sequences and its phylogenetic consequences for weighting in phylogeny. C. R. Acad. Sci. III, Sci. Vie 321 (1998) 611-620
24. Hassanin A., Pasquet E., and Vigne J.D. Molecular systematics of the subfamily Caprinae (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) as determined from cytochrome b sequences. J. Mammal. Evol. 5 (1998) 217-236
25. Douady C.J., Delsuc F., Boucher Y., Doolittle W.F., and Douzery E.J.P. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 248-254
26. Erixon P., Svennblad B., Britton T., and Oxelman B. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 665-673
27. Gatesy J., Matthee C., DeSalle R., and Hayashi C. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 652-664
28. Springer M.S., and de Jong W.W. Which mammalian supertree to bark up?. Science 291 (2001) 1709-1711
29. Ropiquet A., and Hassanin A. Hybrid origin of the Pliocene ancestor of wild goats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41 (2006) 395-404
30. Hassanin A., and Ropiquet A. Resolving a zoological mystery: the kouprey is a real species. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274 (2007) 2849-2855
31. Miyamoto M.M., and Fitch W.M. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (1995) 503-513
32. Chen W., Bonillo C., and Lecointre G. Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26 (2003) 262-288
33. Lecointre G., and Deleporte P. Total evidence requires exclusion of phylogenetically misleading data. Zool. Scr. 34 (2005) 101-117
34. Gatesy J., O'Grady P., and Baker R.H. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15 (1999) 271-313
35. Burger G., Gray M.W., and Lang B. Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes. Trends Genet. 19 (2003) 709-716
36. Parr R.L., Maki J., Reguly B., Dakubo G.D., Aguirre A., Wittock R., Robinson K., Jakupciak J.P., and Thayer R.E. The pseudo-mitochondrial genome influences mistakes in heteroplasmy interpretation. BMC Genomics 7 (2006) 185
37. Hassanin A., Léger N., and Deutsch J. Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic inferences. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 277-298
38. Hassanin A. Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38 (2006) 100-116
39. Pupko T., Huchon D., Cao Y., Okada N., and Hasegawa M. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: which models are the best?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (2002) 2294-2307
40. Nylander J.A.A., Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P., and Nieves-Aldrey J.L. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 47-67
41. Seo T., Kishino H., and Thorne J.L. Incorporating gene-specific variation when inferring and evaluating optimal evolutionary tree topologies from multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 4436-4441
42. Lee M.S.Y., and Hugall A.F. Model type, implicit data weighting, and model averaging in phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38 (2006) 848-857
43. Castoe T.C., Doan T.M., and Parkinson C.L. Data partitions and complex models in Bayesian analysis: the phylogeny of gymnophthalmid lizards. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 448-469
44. Brandley M.C., Schmitz A., and Reeder T.W. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 373-390
45. Castoe T.C., and Parkinson C.L. Bayesian mixed models and the phylogeny of pitvipers (Viperidae: Serpentes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39 (2006) 91-110
46. Verkaar E.L., Nijman I.J., Beeke M., Hanekamp E., and Lenstra J.A. Maternal and paternal lineages in cross-breeding bovine species. Has wisent a hybrid origin?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 1165-1170
47. Waddell P.J., and Shelley S. Evaluating placental inter-ordinal phylogenies with novel sequences including RAG1, gamma-fibrinogen, ND6, and mt-tRNA, plus MCMC-driven nucleotide, amino acid, and codon models. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28 (2003) 197-224
48. Hassanin A., and Douzery E.J.P. The tribal radiation of the family Bovidae (Artiodactyla) and the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13 (1999) 227-243
49. Ropiquet A., and Hassanin A. Molecular phylogeny of caprines (Bovidae, Antilopinae): the question of their origin and diversification during the Miocene. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 43 (2005) 49-60