Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 652-664

  Gatesy, John ^a   Matthee, Conrad ^b   DeSalle, Rob ^c   Hayashi, Cheryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIODACTYLA; CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; ARTIODACTYLA; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALIA; ARTIODACTYLA;

EID: 0036698966     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102311     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Arnason, U., A. Gullberg, S. Gretarsdottir, B. Ursing, and A. Janke. 2000. The mitochondrial genome of the sperm whale and a new molecular reference for estimating eutherian divergence dates. J. Mol. Evol. 50:569-578.
2. Barrett, M., M. J. Donoghue, and E. Sober. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
3. Baum, B. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
4. Beintema, J., C. Schuller, M. Irie, and A. Carsana. 1988. Molecular evolution of the ribonuclease super-family. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 51:165-192.
5. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and H. Bryant. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst. Biol. 47:497-508.
6. Bininda-Emonds, O., J. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: A complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol. Rev. 74:143-175.
7. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction. Syst. Biol. 50:565-579.
8. Blackburn, T., K. Gaston, R. Quinn, H. Arnold, and R. Gregory. 1997. Of mice and wrens: The relation between abundance and geographic range size in British mammals and birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352:419-427.
9. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
10. Czelusniak, J., M. Goodman, B. Koop, D. Tagle, J. Shoshani, G. Braunitzer, T. Kleinschmidt, W. DeJong, and G. Matsuda. 1990. Perspectives from amino acid sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria. Curr. Mammal. 2:545-572.
11. DeJong, W. 1998. Molecules remodel the mammalian tree. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:270-275.
12. Farris, J. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in cladistics, Volume 2 (N. Platnick and V. Funk, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
14. Fitch, W., and J. Beintema. 1990. Correcting parsimonious trees for unseen nucleotide substitutions: The effect of dense branching as exemplified by ribonuclease. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:438-443.
15. Gatesy, J. 1997. More DNA support for a Cetacea/Hippopotamidae clade: The blood-clotting protein gene gamma-fibrinogen. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:537-543.
16. Gatesy, J. 1998. Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea. Pages 63-111 in The emergence of whales (J. Thewissen, ed.). Plenum, New York.
17. Gatesy, J., C. Hayashi, M. Cronin, and P. Arctander. 1996. Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:954-963.
18. Gatesy, J., M. Milinkovitch, V. Waddell, and M. Stanhope. 1999. Stability of cladistic relationships between Cetacea and higher-level artiodactyl taxa. Syst. Biol. 48:6-20.
19. Gaudin, T., J. Wible, J. Hopson, and W. Turnbull. 1996. Reexamination of the morphological evidence for the cohort Epitheria (Mammalia, Eutheria). J. Mammal. Evol. 3:31-79.
20. Geisler, J. 2001. New morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae. Am. Mus. Novit. 3344:1-53.
21. Gittleman, J., and A. Purvis. 1998. Body size and species richness in carnivores and primates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:113-119.
22. Goodman, M., A. Romero-Herrera, H. Dene, J. Czelusniak, and R. Tashian. 1982. Amino acid sequence evidence on the phylogeny of primates and other eutherians. Pages 115-191 in Macromolecular sequences in systematic and evolutionary biology (M. Goodman, ed.). Plenum, New York.
23. Graur, D., and D. Higgins. 1994. Molecular evidence for the inclusion of cetaceans within the order Artiodactyla. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:357-364.
24. Halanych, K. M. 1998. Lagomorphs misplaced by more characters and fewer taxa. Syst. Biol. 47:138-146.
25. Hillis, D. 1999. SINEs of the perfect character. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9979-9981.
26. Janis, C. 1988. New ideas in ungulate phylogeny and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:291-297.
27. Jones, K., A. Purvis, A. Maclarnon, O. Bininda-Emonds, and N. Simmons. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biol. Rev. 77:223-259.
28. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
29. Langer, P. 2001. Evidence from the digestive tract on phylogenetic relationships in ungulates and whales. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 39:77-90.
30. Lioupis, A., O. Wallis, and M. Wallis. 1997. Cloning and characterisation of the gene encoding red deer (Cervus elaphus) growth hormone: Implications for the molecular evolution of growth hormone in artiodactyls. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 19:259-266.
31. Liu, F., M. Miyamoto, N. Freire, P. Ong, M. Tennant, T. Young, and K. Gugel. 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291:1786-1789.
32. Luckett, W., and N. Hong. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships between the orders Artiodactyla and Cetacea: A combined assessment of morphological and molecular evidence. J. Mammal. Evol. 5:127-182.
33. Lynch, M. 1997. Mutation accumulation in nuclear, organelle, and prokaryotic transfer RNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:914-925.
34. Madsen, O., M. Scally, C. Douady, D. Kao, R. Debry, R. Adkins, H. Amrine, M. Stanhope, W. DeJong, and M. Springer. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409:610-614.
35. Matthee, C. A., J. D. Burzlaff, J. F. Taylor, and S. K. Davis. 2001. Mining the mammalian genome for artiodactyl systematics. Syst. Biol. 50:367-390.
36. McKenna, M. 1975. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia. Pages 21-46 in Phylogeny of the primates (W. Luckett and F. Szalay, eds.). Plenum, New York.
37. McKenna, M. 1987. Molecular and morphological analysis of high-level mammalian interrelationships. Pages 55-93 in Molecules and morphology in evolution: Conflict or compromise? (C. Patterson, ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
38. Messenger, S. L., and J. A. McGuire. 1998. Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Syst. Biol. 47:90-124.
39. Milinkovitch, M., and J. Thewissen. 1997. Even-toed fingerprints on whale ancestry. Nature 388:622-624.
40. Miyamoto, M. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1:186-189.
41. Miyamoto, M. M., and M. Goodman. 1986. Biomolecular systematics of eutherian mammals: Phylogenetic patterns and classification. Syst. Zool. 35:230-240.
42. Montgelard, C., F. Catzeflis, and F. Douzery. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of artiodactyls and cetaceans as deduced from the comparison of cytochrome b and 12S rRNA mt sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:550-559.
43. Murphy, W., E. Eizrik, W. Johnson, Y. Zhang, O. Ryder, and S. O'Brien. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409:614-618.
44. Nikaido, M., F. Matsuno, H. Hamilton, R. Brownell, Y. Cao, W. Ding, Z. Zuoyan, A. Shedlock, R. Fordyce, M. Hasegawa, and N. Okada. 2001. Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: The monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:7384-7389.
45. Nikaido, M., A. Rooney, and N. Okada. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: Hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10261-10266.
46. Nixon, K., and J. Carpenter. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221-241.
47. Novacek, M. 1992. Mammalian phylogeny: Shaking the tree. Nature 356:121-125.
48. Novacek, M. 1994. Morphological and molecular in-roads to phylogeny. Pages 85-131 in Interpreting the hierarchy of nature (L. Grande and O. Rieppel, eds.). Academic Press, New York.
49. O'Leary, M. 2001. The phylogenetic position of cetaceans: Further combined data analyses, comparisons with the stratigraphic record, and a discussion of character optimization. Am. Zool. 41:487-506.
50. O'Leary, M., and J. Geisler. 1999. The position of Cetacea within Mammalia: Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data from extinct and extant taxa. Syst. Biol. 48:455-490.
51. Pisani, D., and M. Wilkinson. 2002. Matrix representation with parsimony, taxonomic congruence, and total evidence. Syst. Biol. 51:151-155.
52. Prothero, D. 1993. Ungulate phylogeny: Molecular vs. morphological evidence. Pages 173-181 in Mammal phylogeny. Placentals (F. Szalay, M. Novacek, and M. McKenna, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
53. Prothero, D., E. Manning, and M. Fischer. 1988. The phylogeny of the ungulates. Pages 201-234 in The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Volume 2 (M. Benton, ed.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
54. Purvis, A. 1995a. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 348:405-421.
55. Purvis, A. 1995b. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-255.
56. Purvis, A., and L. Bromham. 1997. Estimating the transition/transversion ratio from independent pair-wise comparisons with an assumed phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 44:112-119.
57. Purvis, A., S. Nee, and P. Harvey. 1995. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260:329-333.
58. Ragan, M. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
59. Reynolds, P. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of surface areas of mammals. J. Mammal. 78:859-868.
60. Ronquist, F. 1996. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting. Syst. Biol. 45:247-253.
61. Sanderson, M., A. Purvis, and C. Henze. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:105-109.
62. Schaeffer, B. 1947. Notes on the origin and function of the artiodactyl tarsus. Am. Mus. Novit. 1356:1-24.
63. Shimamura, M., H. Yasue, K. Ohahima, H. Abe, H. Kato, T. Kishiro, M. Goto, I. Munechika, and N. Okada. 1997. Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature 388:666-670.
64. Shoshani, J. 1986. Mammalian phylogeny: Comparison of morphological and molecular results. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:222-242.
65. Shoshani, J. 1992. Cuvier vis-aÌ-vis Huxley on the relationship of Hyracoidea and an update on an old controversy. Pages 103-112 in Ongules/ungulates 91 (F. Spitz, ed.). Societe Francaise pour d'Etude Protection deles Mammales, Paris.
66. Shoshani, J. 1993. Hyracoidea-Tethytheria affinity based on myological data. Pages 235-256 in Mammal phylogeny. Placentals (F. Szalay, M. Novacek, and M. McKenna, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
67. Shoshani, J., and M. McKenna. 1998. Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:572-584.
68. Springer, M., and W. DeJong. 2001. Which mammalian supertree to bark up? Science 291:1709-1711.
69. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), Version 4.0b8. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
70. Templeton, A. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
71. Thewissen, J. 1994. Phylogenetic aspects of cetacean origins: A morphological perspective. J. Mammal. Evol. 2:157-184.
72. Thewissen, J., and S. Madar. 1999. Ankle morphology of the earliest cetaceans and its implications for the phylogenetic relations among ungulates. Syst. Biol. 48:21-30.
73. Thewissen, J., E. Williams, L. Roe, and S. Hussain. 2001. Skeletons of terrestrial cetaceans and the relationship of whales to artiodactyls. Science 413:277-281.
74. Wible, J. 1987. The eutherian stapedial artery: Character analysis and implications for superordinal relationships. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91:107-136.
75. Woodroffe, R., and J. Ginsberg. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126-2128.
76. Wyss, A., M. Novacek, and M. McKenna. 1987. Amino acid sequence versus morphological data and the interordinal relationships of mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:99-116.