Chromosome cohesion and the spindle checkpoint

Cell Cycle

Volumn 8, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 2733-2740

  Díaz Martínez, Laura A ^a   Clarke, Duncan J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

cdc20; Cohesin; Mcd1; Mitosis; Rad21; Scc1; Spindle checkpoint

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; COHESIN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; PROTEIN MAD2; SECURIN; UVOMORULIN;

ANAPHASE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPINDLE CHECKPOINT;

EID: 69749083046     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.17.9403     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:658-667
2. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. Aneuploidy: instigator and inhibitor of tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2007; 67:10103-10105
3. Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW. Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8699-8704
4. Mazumdar M, Lee JH, Sengupta K, Ried T, Rane S, Misteli T. Tumor formation via loss of a molecular motor protein. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1559-1564 (Pubitemid 44142981)
5. Maiato H, Sunkel CE. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division. Chromosome Res 2004; 12:585-597
6. Burke DJ, Stukenberg PT. Linking kinetochore-microtubule binding to the spindle checkpoint. Dev Cell 2008; 14:474-479
7. Kotwaliwale C, Biggins S. Microtubule capture: a concerted effort. Cell 2006; 127:1105-1108
8. Tanaka TU, Desai A. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:53-63.
9. Kline-Smith SL, Sandall S, Desai A. Kinetochore-spindle microtubule interactions during mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17:35-46.
10. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:5461-5477
11. Cimini D. Detection and correction of merotelic kinetochore orientation by Aurora B and its partners. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1558-1564 (Pubitemid 47327940)
12. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions "in check" by Bub1, Bub3 and BubR1: The dual task of attaching and signalling. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:1763-1768
13. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:1301-1310 (Pubitemid 24362564)
14. Rieder CL, Palazzo RE. Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:387-392
15. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol 1979; 80:674-691 (Pubitemid 9136041)
16. Sluder G, Begg DA. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol 1983; 97:877-886
17. Sluder G, Miller FJ, Thompson EA, Wolf DE. Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol 1994; 126:189-198 (Pubitemid 24214939)
18. Zirkle RE. Ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of newt-cell cytoplasm: spindle destruction, false anaphase, and delay of true anaphase. Radiat Res 1970; 41:516-537
19. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 1991; 66:507-517
20. Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 1991; 66:519-531 (Pubitemid 121001388)
21. Rudner AD, Murray AW. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996; 8:773-780
22. Bharadwaj R, Qi W, Yu H. Identification of two novel components of the human NDC80 kinetochore complex. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:13076-13085 (Pubitemid 38445885)
23. Luo X, Yu H. Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure 2008; 16:1616-1625
24. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-393
25. Shah JV, Botvinick E, Bonday Z, Furnari F, Berns M, Cleveland DW. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr Biol 2004; 14:942-952 (Pubitemid 38722608)
26. Clarke DJ, Bachant J. Kinetochore structure and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Biosci 2008; 13:6787-6819
27. Zachos G, Gillespie DA. Exercising restraints: role of Chk1 in regulating the onset and progression of unperturbed mitosis in vertebrate cells. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:810-813 (Pubitemid 46572620)
28. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20 and MAD2. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:925-936 (Pubitemid 34286173)
29. Hardwick KG, Johnston RC, Smith DL, Murray AW. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p and Mad2p. J Cell Biol 2000; 148:871-882
30. Tang Z, Sun Y, Harley SE, Zou H, Yu H. Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through Shugoshin during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:18012-18017 (Pubitemid 40054066)
31. Yu H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002; 14:706-714
32. Yu H. Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol Cell 2007; 27:3-16. (Pubitemid 46991390)
33. Peters JM. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol Cell 2002; 9:931-943 (Pubitemid 34626665)
34. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644-656
35. Crasta K, Lim HH, Zhang T, Nirantar S, Surana U. Consorting kinases, end of destruction and birth of a spindle. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:2960-2966
36. Kulukian A, Han JS, Cleveland DW. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev Cell 2009; 16:105-117
37. Fang G, Yu H, Kirschner MW. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1871-1883 (Pubitemid 28304339)
38. Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, Hwang ES, et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 1998; 279:1041-1044 (Pubitemid 28113307)
39. Kallio M, Weinstein J, Daum JR, Burke DJ, Gorbsky GJ. Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J Cell Biol 1998; 141:1393-1406 (Pubitemid 28289914)
40. Schott EJ, Hoyt MA. Dominant alleles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC20 reveal its role in promoting anaphase. Genetics 1998; 148:599-610.
41. Wassmann K, Benezra R. Mad2 transiently associates with an APC/p55Cdc complex during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:11193-11198 (Pubitemid 28450104)
42. King EM, van der Sar SJ, Hardwick KG. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:342.
43. Pan J, Chen RH. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1439-1451
44. Nilsson J, Yekezare M, Minshull J, Pines J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1411-1420
45. Ge S, Skaar JR, Pagano M. APC/C- and Mad2-mediated degradation of Cdc20 during spindle checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:167-171
46. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H. Mad2-independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 2001; 1:227-237 (Pubitemid 33653058)
47. Millband DN, Hardwick KG. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p- and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:2728-2742
48. Malureanu LA, Jeganathan KB, Hamada M, Wasilewski L, Davenport J, van Deursen JM. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev Cell 2009; 16:118-131
49. Reddy SK, Rape M, Margansky WA, Kirschner MW. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 2007; 446:921-925 (Pubitemid 46633168)
50. Stegmeier F, Rape M, Draviam VM, Nalepa G, Sowa ME, Ang XL, et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 2007; 446:876-881 (Pubitemid 46763072)
51. Listovsky T, Oren YS, Yudkovsky Y, Mahbubani HM, Weiss AM, Lebendiker M, et al. Mammalian Cdh1/Fzr mediates its own degradation. EMBO J 2004; 23:1619-1626 (Pubitemid 38579522)
52. Li M, York JP, Zhang P. Loss of Cdc20 causes a securin-dependent metaphase arrest in two-cell mouse embryos. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:3481-3488 (Pubitemid 46685222)
53. Meraldi P, Sorger PK. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J 2005; 24:1621-1633 (Pubitemid 40646451)
54. Baumgarten AJ, Felthaus J, Wasch R. Strong inducible knockdown of APC/C(Cdc20) does not cause mitotic arrest in human somatic cells. Cell Cycle 2009; 8.
55. Kim HS, Jeon YK, Ha GH, Park HY, Kim YJ, Shin HJ, et al. Functional interaction between BubR1 and securin in an anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosomeCdc20-independent manner. Cancer Res 2009; 69:27-36.
56. Gimenez-Abian JF, Diaz-Martinez LA, Wirth KG, Andrews CA, Gimenez-Martin G, Clarke DJ. Regulated separation of sister centromeres depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint but not on the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1561-1575 (Pubitemid 41609139)
57. Raff JW, Jeffers K, Huang JY. The roles of Fzy/Cdc20 and Fzr/Cdh1 in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in space and time. J Cell Biol 2002; 157:1139-1149 (Pubitemid 34847785)
58. Acquaviva C, Pines J. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome: APC/C. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:2401-2404
59. Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, van Deursen JM. The Rae1-Nup98 complex prevents aneuploidy by inhibiting securin degradation. Nature 2005; 438:1036-1039 (Pubitemid 43093978)
60. Jeganathan KB, Baker DJ, van Deursen JM. Securin associates with APCCdh1 in prometaphase but its destruction is delayed by Rae1 and Nup98 until the metaphase/anaphase transition. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:366-370
61. Zur A, Brandeis M. Securin degradation is mediated by fzy and fzr, and is required for complete chromatid separation but not for cytokinesis. EMBO J 2001; 20:792-801. (Pubitemid 32167643)
62. Shirayama M, Toth A, Galova M, Nasmyth K. APC(Cdc20) promotes exit from mitosis by destroying the anaphase inhibitor Pds1 and cyclin Clb5. Nature 1999; 402:203-207
63. Holloway SL, Glotzer M, King RW, Murray AW. Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor. Cell 1993; 73:1393-1402 (Pubitemid 23201151)
64. King RW, Peters JM, Tugendreich S, Rolfe M, Hieter P, Kirschner MW. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 1995; 81:279-288
65. Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 1996; 10:3081-3093
66. Yamamoto A, Guacci V, Koshland D. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J Cell Biol 1996; 133:99-110. (Pubitemid 26107099)
67. Zou H, McGarry TJ, Bernal T, Kirschner MW. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 1999; 285:418-422 (Pubitemid 29343966)
68. Feine O, Zur A, Mahbubani H, Brandeis M. Human Kid is degraded by the APC/C(Cdh1) but not by the APC/C(Cdc20). Cell Cycle 2007; 6:2516-2523
69. Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 2000; 103:399-410.
70. Gimenez-Abian JF, Diaz-Martinez LA, Waizenegger IC, Gimenez-Martin G, Clarke DJ. Separase is required at multiple pre-anaphase cell cycle stages in human cells. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1576-1584 (Pubitemid 41609140)
71. Papi M, Berdougo E, Randall CL, Ganguly S, Jallepalli PV. Multiple roles for separase auto-cleavage during the G2/M transition. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:1029-1035 (Pubitemid 41486278)
72. Nakajima M, Kumada K, Hatakeyama K, Noda T, Peters JM, Hirota T. The complete removal of cohesin from chromosome arms depends on separase. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:4188-4196
73. Godinho S, Tavares AA. A role for Drosophila Polo protein in chromosome resolution and segregation during mitosis. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:2529-2534
74. Diaz-Martinez LA, Gimenez-Abian JF, Clarke DJ. Cohesin is dispensable for centromere cohesion in human cells. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:318.
75. Yuan K, Li N, Huo Y, Yan F, Yang Y, Ward T, et al. Recruitment of separase to mitotic chromosomes is regulated by Aurora B. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1433-1443
76. Leng M, Bessuso D, Jung SY, Wang Y, Qin J. Targeting Plk1 to chromosome arms and regulating chromosome compaction by the PICH ATPase. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:1480-1489 (Pubitemid 351872588)
77. Stegmeier F, Visintin R, Amon A. Separase, polo kinase, the kinetochore protein Slk19, and Spo12 function in a network that controls Cdc14 localization during early anaphase. Cell 2002; 108:207-220 (Pubitemid 34161141)
78. Berdougo E, Nachury MV, Jackson PK, Jallepalli PV. The nucleolar phosphatase Cdc14B is dispensable for chromosome segregation and mitotic exit in human cells. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:1184-1190 (Pubitemid 351749271)
79. Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Birnby D, Orr-Weaver TL. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 1992; 130:827-841
80. Moore DP, Page AW, Tang TT, Kerrebrock AW, Orr-Weaver TL. The cohesion protein MEI-S332 localizes to condensed meiotic and mitotic centromeres until sister chromatids separate. J Cell Biol 1998; 140:1003-1012
81. Tang TT, Bickel SE, Young LM, Orr-Weaver TL. Maintenance of sister-chromatid cohesion at the centromere by the Drosophila MEI-S332 protein. Genes Dev 1998; 12:3843-3856
82. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 2004; 427:510-517 (Pubitemid 38209104)
83. Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 2004; 118:567-578 (Pubitemid 39179710)
84. Macy B, Wang M, Yu HG. The many faces of shugoshin, the "guardian spirit," in chromosome segregation. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:35-37
85. Sakuno T, Tada K, Watanabe Y. Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere. Nature 2009; 458:852-858
86. Clift D, Bizzari F, Marston AL. Shugoshin prevents cohesin cleavage by PP2A(Cdc55)-dependent inhibition of separase. Genes Dev 2009; 23:766-780
87. Kitajima TS, Sakuno T, Ishiguro K, Iemura S, Natsume T, Kawashima SA, et al. Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature 2006; 441:46-52. (Pubitemid 43827947)
88. Tang Z, Shu H, Qi W, Mahmood NA, Mumby MC, Yu H. PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation. Dev Cell 2006; 10:575-585
89. Pouwels J, Kukkonen AM, Lan W, Daum JR, Gorbsky GJ, Stukenberg T, et al. Shugoshin 1 plays a central role in kinetochore assembly and is required for kinetochore targeting of Plk1. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1579-1585 (Pubitemid 47327944)
90. Williams GL, Roberts TM, Gjoerup OV. Bub1: escapades in a cellular world. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1699-1704
91. Adachi Y, Kokubu A, Ebe M, Nagao K, Yanagida M. Cut1/separase-dependent roles of multiple phosphorylation of fission yeast cohesion subunit Rad21 in post-replicative damage repair and mitosis. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:765-776
92. Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:69. (Pubitemid 40605292)
93. Hornig NC, Uhlmann F. Preferential cleavage of chromatin-bound cohesin after targeted phosphorylation by Polo-like kinase. EMBO J 2004; 23:3144-3153 (Pubitemid 39093608)
94. Riedel CG, Katis VL, Katou Y, Mori S, Itoh T, Helmhart W, et al. Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature 2006; 441:53-61. (Pubitemid 43827948)
95. Yin S, Sun XF, Schatten H, Sun QY. Molecular insights into mechanisms regulating faithful chromosome separation in female meiosis. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:2997-3005.
96. Karamysheva Z, Diaz-Martinez LA, Crow SE, Li B, Yu H. Multiple anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome degrons mediate the degradation of human Sgo1. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:1772-1780
97. Gregan J, Rumpf C, Li Z, Cipak L. What makes centromeric cohesion resistant to separase cleavage during meiosis I but not during meiosis II? Cell Cycle 2008; 7:151-153
98. Queralt E, Lehane C, Novak B, Uhlmann F. Downregulation of PP2A(Cdc55) phosphatase by separase initiates mitotic exit in budding yeast. Cell 2006; 125:719-732
99. Holland AJ, Bottger F, Stemmann O, Taylor SS. Protein phosphatase 2A and separase form a complex regulated by separase autocleavage. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:24623-24632 (Pubitemid 47347545)
100. Haering CH, Farcas AM, Arumugam P, Metson J, Nasmyth K. The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature 2008; 454:297-301.
101. Nasmyth K, Schleiffer A. From a single double helix to paired double helices and back. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004; 359:99-108. (Pubitemid 38106453)
102. Zhang N, Pati D. Handcuff for sisters: a new model for sister chromatid cohesion. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:399-402.
103. Huang CE, Milutinovich M, Koshland D. Rings, bracelet or snaps: fashionable alternatives for Smc complexes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:537-542 (Pubitemid 41529651)
104. Skibbens RV. Cell biology of cancer: BRCA1 and sister chromatid pairing reactions? Cell Cycle 2008; 7:449-452
105. Clarke DJ, Vas AC, Andrews CA, Diaz-Martinez LA, Gimenez-Abian JF. Topoisomerase
106. Luo K, Lou Z. Dual roles of topoisomerase II. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:679.
107. Inoue A, Li T, Roby SK, Valentine MB, Inoue M, Boyd K, et al. Loss of ChlR1 helicase in mouse causes lethality due to the accumulation of aneuploid cells generated by cohesion defects and placental malformation. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1646-1654 (Pubitemid 47327952)
108. Kenney RD, Heald R. Essential roles for cohesin in kinetochore and spindle function in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:5057-5066 (Pubitemid 46085185)
109. Ogiwara H, Enomoto T, Seki M. The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex functions in sister chromatid cohesion. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:1090-1095 (Pubitemid 46708582)
110. Diaz-Martinez LA, Gimenez-Abian JF, Clarke DJ. Chromosome cohesion - rings, knots, orcs and fellowship. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:2107-2114
111. Shimada K, Gasser SM. The origin recognition complex functions in sister-chromatid cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2007; 128:85-99.
112. Kato H, Matsunaga F, Miyazaki S, Yin L, D'Urso G, Tanaka K, et al. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Orc5 plays multiple roles in the maintenance of genome stability throughout the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:1085-1096
113. Behlke-Steinert S, Touat-Todeschini L, Skoufias DA, Margolis RL. SMC5 and MMS21 are required for chromosome cohesion and mitotic progression. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1-8.