Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: A discrete choice conjoint experiment

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 929-943

  Cunningham, Charles E ^a,d,f   Vaillancourt, Tracy ^a,b,e   Rimas, Heather ^a   Deal, Ken ^a,d   Cunningham, Lesley ^c   Short, Kathy ^c   Chen, Yvonne ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c Hamilton Wentworth District School Board   (Canada)

^d Hamilton Wentworth District School Board ^*

^e School of Psychology

^f MCMASTER CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bullying; Conjoint analysis; Preferences; Prevention; School

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; BULLYING; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PREVENTION; SCHOOL; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STAFF; STUDENT ATTITUDE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEACHER; TRAINING;

AGGRESSION; ATTITUDE; BAYES THEOREM; CHILD; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FACULTY; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOLS;

EID: 69549121762     PISSN: 00910627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-009-9324-2     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. GM Allenby N Arora JL Gintner 1995 Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies JMR, Journal of Marketing Research 32 152 162 10.2307/3152044
2. CJ Armitage M Conner 2001 Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review The British Journal of Social Psychology 40 4 471 499 10.1348/014466601164939 (Pubitemid 33597358)
3. L Arseneault E Walsh K Trzesniewski R Newcombe A Caspi TE Moffitt 2006 Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: a nationally representative cohort study Pediatrics 118 1 130 138 10.1542/peds.2005-2388 (Pubitemid 46071156)
4. RS Barbour 1999 The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 4 1 39 43
5. EM Caruso DA Rahnev MR Banaji 2009 Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices Social Cognition 27 1 128 137 10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.128
6. J Coast 1999 The appropriate uses of qualitative methods in health economics Health Economics 8 4 345 353 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199906)8: 4<345::AID-HEC432>3.0.CO;2-Q (Pubitemid 29346926)
7. WM Craig D Pepler R Atlas 2000 Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom School Psychology International 21 1 22 36 10.1177/0143034300211002
8. CE Cunningham K Deal H Rimas DH Buchanan M Gold K Sdao-Jarvie, et al. 2008 Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 7 36 1128 1138
9. Cunningham, C. E., Vaillancourt, T., Cunningham, L. J., & Short, K. (2009). The bullying prevention attitudes scale. Unpublished manuscript.
10. CE Cunningham LJ Cunningham V Martorelli A Tran J Young R Zacharias 1998 The effects of primary division, student-mediated conflict resolution programs on playground aggression Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 39 5 653 662 10.1017/S0021963098002558 (Pubitemid 28339598)
11. CE Cunningham CA Woodward HS Shannon J [tmp] MacIntosh B Lendrum D Rosenbloom, et al. 2002 Readiness for organizational change: a longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75 4 377 392 10.1348/ 096317902321119637 (Pubitemid 37239665)
12. WS DeSarbo V Ramaswamy SH Cohen 1995 Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis Marketing Letters 6 2 137 147 10.1007/BF00994929
13. MJ Elias JE Zins PA Graczyk RP Weissberg 2003 Implementation, sustainability, and scaling up of social-emotional and academic innovations in public schools School Psychology Review 32 3 303 320
14. AA Fagan S Mihalic 2003 Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: lessons learned from the blueprints for violence prevention replications of the life skills training program Journal of Community Psychology 31 3 235 253 10.1002/jcop.10045 (Pubitemid 36507951)
15. M Fekkes FI Pijpers SP Verloove-Vanhorick 2006 Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 160 6 638 644 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.638 (Pubitemid 43854407)
16. KS Frey MK Hirschstein JL Snell LV Edstrom EP [tmp] MacKenzie CJ Broderick 2005 Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the steps to respect program Developmental Psychology 41 3 479 490 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479 (Pubitemid 40831065)
17. J Gamage S Weerahandi 1998 Size performance of some tests in one-way anova Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation 27 3 625 640 10.1080/03610919808813500
18. MT Greenberg 2004 Current and future challenges in school-based prevention: the researcher perspective Prevention Science 5 1 5 13 10.1023/B:PREV.0000013976.84939.55 (Pubitemid 39023959)
19. MT Greenberg RP Weissberg MU O'Brien JE Zins L Fredericks H Resnik, et al. 2003 Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning The American Psychologist 58 6-7 466 474 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466 (Pubitemid 37177540)
20. T Greenhalgh G Robert F Macfarlane P Bate O Kyriakidou 2004 Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations The Milbank Quarterly 82 4 581 629 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x (Pubitemid 40143100)
21. A Gregory DB Henry ME Schoeny 2007 School climate and implementation of a preventive intervention American Journal of Community Psychology 40 3-4 250 260 10.1007/s10464-007-9142-z
22. Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2007). Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement (pp. 3-34). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis A primer. New York-U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.
24. K Hoagwood J Johnson 2003 School psychology: a public health framework I. From evidence-based practices to evidence-based policies Journal of School Psychology 41 1 3 21 10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00141-3 (Pubitemid 36188679)
25. Huber, J., Orme, B., & Miller, R. (2007). Dealing with product similarity in conjoint simulations. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement: methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 347-362). New York: Springer.
26. JH Kallestad 2003 Predicting teachers' and schools' implementation of the olweus bullying prevention program: a multilevel study Prevention & Treatment 6 3 21
27. YS Kim BL Leventhal YJ Koh A Hubbard WT Boyce 2006 School bullying and youth violence: causes or consequences of psychopathologic behavior? Archives of General Psychiatry 63 9 1035 1041 10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.1035 (Pubitemid 44330463)
28. PJ Lenk WS DeSarbo PE Green MR Young 1996 Hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs Marketing Science 15 2 173 192 10.1287/mksc.15.2.173
29. JE Lochman 2003 Commentary: school contextual influences on the dissemination of interventions School Psychology Review 32 2 174 178
30. Louviere, J., Hensher, D., & Swait, J. (2007). Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement-methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 167-197). New York: Springer.
31. RD Luce JW Tukey 1964 Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 1 1 27 10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
32. KW Merrell DM Isava 2008 How effective are school bullying intervention programs? School Psychology Quarterly 23 1 26 42 10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
33. UV Midthassel 2008 Is the sustainability of reduction in bullying related to follow-up procedures? Educational Psychology 28 1 1 13 10.1080/ 01443410701449278
34. Mytton, J., DiGuiseppi, C., Gough, D., Taylor, R., & Logan, S. (2006). School-based secondary prevention programmes for preventing violence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), 3. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD004606.pub2.
35. D Olweus 1994 Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 35 7 1171 1190 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x
36. Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison: Research Publishers.
37. Patterson, M., & Chrzan, K. (2004). Partial profile discrete choice: what's the optimal number of attributes? (pp. 173-185). San Antonio, TX: 2003 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings.
38. AA Payne DC Gottfredson GD Gottfredson 2006 School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: results from a national study Prevention Science 7 2 225 237 10.1007/s11121-006-0029-2 (Pubitemid 43978907)
39. MB Perkins PS Jensen J Jaccard P Gollwitzer G Oettingen E Pappadopulos, et al. 2007 Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians' behavior: what do we know? Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) 58 3 342 348 10.1176/appi.ps.58.3.342 (Pubitemid 46480050)
40. KA Phillips FR Johnson T Maddala 2002 Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys Health Services Research 37 6 1659 1679 10.1111/1475-6773.01116 (Pubitemid 36070259)
41. Ramaswamy, V., & Cohen, S. H. (2007). Latent class models for conjoint analysis. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmanm & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 295-320). Heidelberg: Springer.
42. H Ringeisen K Henderson K Hoagwood 2003 Context matters: schools and the "research to practice gap" in children's mental health School Psychology Review 32 2 153 169
43. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free.
44. M Rones K Hoagwood 2000 School-based mental health services: a research review Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 3 4 223 241 10.1023/A:1026425104386
45. Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2007). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Netherlands: Springer.
46. M Ryan DA Scott C Reeves A Bate ER van Teijlingen EM Russell, et al. 2001 Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques Health Technology Assessment 5 5 1 186
47. Sawtooth Software Inc. (2004a). The CBC/HB system for hierarchical bayes estimation version 4.0 technical paper. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbtech. pdf
48. Sawtooth Software Inc. (2004b). The CBC latent class technical paper (version 3). Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/lctech.pdf
49. SK Schoenwald K Hoagwood 2001 Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: what matters when? Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) 52 9 1190 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1190 (Pubitemid 32823190)
50. AK Shah DM Oppenheimer 2008 Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework Psychological Bulletin 134 2 207 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
51. Shapiro, D., & Brett, J. (2005). What is the role of control in organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 155-178). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. M Shinn 2003 Understanding implementation of programs in multilevel systems Prevention & Treatment 6 1 22 10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.622c
53. R Spoth M Greenberg K Bierman C Redmond 2004 PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention Prevention Science 5 1 31 39 10.1023/B:PREV.0000013979.52796.8b (Pubitemid 39023962)
54. R Spoth C Redmond 1993 Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample American Journal of Health Promotion 8 2 124 133
55. RC Vreeman AE Carroll 2007 A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 161 1 78 88 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.78 (Pubitemid 46045467)
56. M Vriens M Wedel T Wilms 1996 Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison JMR, Journal of Marketing Research 33 1 73 85 10.2307/3152014